More Negligence From the Proto-Stazi Department of Homeland Security?

November 29, 2011 A.D.

My last post called for the Department of Homeland Security to declare the president of the United States a threat for fomenting terrorism. This is because of his support for the lawless anarchists called the Occupy Wall Steet thugs who continue to protest around the country demanding other peoples money and so forth. Now we learn the bums are costing local government millions of dollars to protect citizens from their aggression, filth, and loitering.

And if law abiding Ron Paul supporters or people who advocate upholding the Constitution could be considered a threat, then certainly so should the president of the United States and his OWS comrades (one of whom recently threatened to burn down Macy's Department store in New York City).

Now, another influential "educated" Ivy League guy jumps into the fray with Obama on behalf of and in praise of the OWS. This time it's Cornell West. He is a radical Marxist professor I first learned about through Bill Buckley's Firing Line decades ago. The old buzzard (West) is still around spewing his "hatred" of white people and people with money.

This priviledged character now also compliments the OWS movement. He calls the movement "important" for finally solving the problem of economic inequality which the War on Poverty couldn't. I guess you could call it West's final solution.

Since the OWS movement is mostly white people, I take it that they are playthings to West. And since West is a Marxist (of the Socialist ilk), I take it that they must be very useful idiots as well. Read about Cornell West's comments here at Real Clear Politics (Hat Tip Drudge Report). He ups the ante of the OW Steeters by claiming that in order to solve the problems of poverty in America the "fight" has to be taken to "the streets". Oh really? Is that not inflammatory wording that if right-wingers used would nail them to some terrorist cross by a lunatic government official?

And what fight is that? Well, it's the fight for "entitlements".

According to West, Americans are entitled to things. Not just freedom, liberty, and rights before the law, but they are entitled to stuff. Other peoples stuff. Their money in particular. Or their local parks, if you wish to humor the OWS people.

But Mr. West, in his comments, didn't tell us where the Constitution says people have the right to get stuff from other people in the way that West suggests. He has written so many books he ought to know and should tell us when someone is robbed of their money for entitlements, from where the government has the authority to do it. West incites the people to fight for the stuff in the streets and, oops, if it gets real ugly and violent will he sit in his ivory tower and claim his innocense? Of course he didn't mean THAT kind of fighting. He meant like Ghandi. Or sit ins. And the such.

Oh dear reader. Marxists never mean such things. They do their dirty deeds by provoking the rabble and the poor to mayhem and murder. They do not want to dirty their own hands. They do their dirty deeds by provoking the young too.

But Ghandi had the right to his disobedience. The OWS doesn't. There is nothing being denied them that is not being denied me. And I am not demanding to fleece my neighbor. There is nothing denied them that is not being denied by offspring. And my offspring does not demand that the neighbor be fleeced for it. No. The OWS has a choice. A choice to chose between right and wrong even when that choice leaves them wanting and in need.

It's laughable. It really is. It is laughable because it is so utterly stupid. Yes, there are greedy rich people, but there are greedy poor people too. And West is stoking their passions. He is inciting them to rapine. It is not good to engender greed in anyone. West thinks otherwise.

This isn't about a righteous civil disobedience fight for unalieanble rights denied because of racism like in the 50s and 60s; it is about promoting criminal-mindedness among the poor. Perhaps West and Obama are frozen in time because of the well-deserved success of the Civil Rights Movement. And perhaps they think they can do the same thing with entitlements. But that isn't going to happen. Even if they are temporarily successful, they will only be successful in promoting criminal thinking and teaching the poor to behave like criminals. That is nothing to be proud of. It certainly has nothing to do with justice, equal or not.

It is one thing to provoke civil disobediance to obtain that which rightfully belongs you to, and another thing to promote it to obtain what doesn't belong to you. And that is what West is promoting. West thinks he is fighting like Ghandi against the British Imperialists. He isn't. He is fighting against his neighbors--his fellow citizens. Ghandi was fight against foreigners. In other words West is agitating for civil war.

Just because some rich people are getting away with it doesn't mean that poor people should be encouraged to do it as well. But that is what West and the Democrats believe.

No one has the right to take that which another has gotten lawfully. And you cannot just make it up and create a fiction that anyone with lots of money had to get it illegally or you are truly mentally disturbed. You would have to prove it case by case in order to prove you needed to codify taking away the wealth of the wealthy on a permanent basis. And that would be impossible. There is no entitlement to what Democrats think is owed. There is no place place in the Constitution where the people are to be guaranteed health care, pensions, jobs, or education. It just doesn't exist. And if it doesn't exist then to force other people to pay for them is a criminal act.

To do this West and Obama would have to overthrow the Constitution and abolish it and institute a new government so they can pretend that citizens are entitled to the things the OWS claim. Under our current laws that is sedition.

And that is why West and Obama are more a threat to the government of the people, by the people, and for the people than Ron Paul, third party candidates, or Tea Partiers. And if you say that the people have a right to be criminals and institute criminality as a basis of government you have corrupted what it means to be a people and are truly a threat to any nation.

Even if these terrorizers could change the Constitution to reflect their criminally-minded Marxist ideology, it would still be wrong. It would still be criminal-thinking. And that is the core of this issue: the criminal thinking of Obama, Cornell West, the Democratic Party, and Marxism.

It is always wrong to fight for wrong. And it is right to fight for right. The OWS, Obama, and West wish to fight for that which is wrong. The Tea Partiers or right wingers lawfully and peacefull fight for that which is right, and right wingers are practically labeled Nazis by Noam Chomsky (Mediate).

Obama and West provoke fighting in the streets and the Department of Homeland Security is silent.


What good is it for?

It is good only for brutality and evil. And that is why the Founders would abhor it and why they gave the government no power to create it.


http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/11/28/cornel_west_ultimate_fight_for_entitlements_will_be_in_the_streets.html

http://www.mediaite.com/online/oh-boy-noam-chomsky-compares-right-wing-media-to-nazis/