Criminally-Minded Behavior

See Something, Say Something Report: Terrorist In Chief, Occupy Wall Street, and the George Soros Cabal

2012-01-25T04:40:00.000-08:00

January 25, 2012 A.D.

If we see something (suspicious) that might lead to a terrorist act we are supposed to "say something". This according to the prot-Stasi Department of Homeland Security (a terrorist organization itself that will destroy you if you get in its way). The drug war will be ending soon, so if a new boogie-man isn't found fast a lot of Nazi types will be out of a job.

You don't even have to be "sure" about the threat. You can make up any fantasy about anyone you want. You just have to report it. Even if it is nonsense. Don't be ashamed of accusing the innocent of terrorism; the government is ever wise and trustworthy, and it will sort it out.

And please ignore the fact that governments murdered, tortured, and destroyed hundreds of millions of innocent civilians last century. Nothing to see there, move along, and for goodness sake JUST DON'T SAY SO. Don't say that government is the biggest terrorist in the history of mankind. You don't want to be caught telling the truth, do you?

Sorry, I cannot help myself.

I'd like to report that President Obama is a terrorist. And he is involved in a violent terrorist plot.

There. I saw it. So I'm saying it. And I'm just "saying something". Anything, apparently. Anything based on a suspicion. The government will get my report. Doubt it not.

And I've already said so before. President Obama supports the Occupy Wall Streeters. And now, even George Soros, an gazillionaire subversive and demon who does Hell's bidding, confirms it that the OWS are prepared for terror. He has announced that there will be rioting and violence.

Terror, in other words.

You will recall that Soros hides out from the rest of us common folk while he manipulates the whole world on puppet strings into becoming "Open Societies". Don't let his website fool you, you will NOT be apart of his power making structure, you will only be subservient to it. You will not be there with him in Davos. They will throw you out if you try to attend uninvited.

You see, it isn't "open". And Soros travels in spheres of power that are totally "closed" to you, the powerless.

You are shit.
You are crap.

And when he is finished with you, you might be murdered and dead from the chaos he creates. Or your country stolen from you right under your nose. He has plans for you and it doesn't matter what you think. He doesn't care if you love your country. You will have an open society and he tell you what that means.

Back to the terrorist threat noted by Soros. Oh, he didn't use the word "terrorist" per se, but we know how leftist subversives (like our president) think about this matter. To them, the Tea Party people (clean, law-abiding, patriotic, sleepers at home and not in parks, non-poopers on police cars, and so forth) are the real terrorist threat.

They are to be watched closely by the Nazis at the fusion centers. They are "gun clingers". And religion "clingers". It would not have been surprising if the fascists at the fusion centers had called them "bible thumpers". Or "fundies" just to drive home the point and scare them.

While the real terrorist threat (Occupy Wall Streeters who threaten to blow up Macy's and so forth) are inspirational good people, and so much so that they are to be backed by our president.

And of course Soros.

And these "good" people are now going to riot.

Now, cogitate this as you like, but what is probably going on here is not Soros's prediction of terrorism in the streets by the OCW bowel-movement and the barbarians who will follow them into the streets, but it is a signal TO the occupiers telling them to begin the terror.

Just "seeing something" and "saying something". Anything. You guys check it out.

Soros isn't worried about the Stasi totalitarian response to the terrorism he nurtured and supports. As long as the leftists are in charge of it, it is okay. Death or destruction from the left is acceptable. Death or destruction from the right is not. This is how the left thinks.

Oh and please, Soros isn't worried about surviving the ensuing chaos he triggers. He knows he will survive. He is merely outlining what the totalitarian fascists he supports in the White House will do to the useful idiots of the OWS movement while on the road to the real goal: putting the rest of us in chains.

Our liberty and self-determination as a people is not part of the "openess"plan. You could say it makes us guilty of "close-mindedness".

Soros will remain free from the tyranny because he is an orchestrator of it. He is not opposed to tyranny he is just not comfy when others initiate it. He can buy his freedom and safety from the disturbances he stirs up. The rest of us cannot. We will have to live in a closed society because of violence he spawns.

Soros blames "unregulated" competition for the mess. But unregulated manipulation of young people in the streets to get them to trigger terror is okay. Feed them any lies. Goad them into hating the rich (though you are rich yourself). Get them to blame the wrong people and focus on the wrong thing. Make them envious. Engender unrighteousness and bad judgment. Stoke the passion of hatred.

This mess isn't about unregulated competition. There are enough laws to punish corporate crooks. The problem is UNREGULATED GOVERNMENT.

And Soros doesn't want the useful idiots prepped for slaughter to know that because Obama is currently the one in charge of it.

The useful idiots Soros has prepped for pain or slaughter never learned the history lesson about absolute power.

It appears Soros is going to teach them about it real soon.

http://www.soros.org/

http://www.npr.org/2012/01/24/145660069/davos-a-super-bowl-for-smart-rich-people

Terrorists Detain Senator Rand Paul

2012-01-23T09:17:00.000-08:00

January 23, 2012 A.D.

The web is abuzz with news that Senator Rand Paul has been detained by terrorists. The TSA detained the senator at a US airport. (Politico)

The news is still breaking but we learn that daddy Paul has tweeted about the threat to the Senator. That much has been confirmed.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0112/71818.html

God Bless Google

2012-01-21T09:21:00.000-08:00

January 21, 2012 A.D.

Like 'em or not, Google played a key role in protecting freedom of speech and blogging on the internet when it and others conducted a blackout this week in protest against recent bad legislation.

I would like to thank them from the bottom of my heart for their bold courage in opposing SOPA and PIPA. Without them, there wouldn't have been so stunning a rebuke to the criminals in congress who are forever trampling our rights and violating their oaths of office to uphold the Constitution.

Ron Paul's Campaign for Liberty online has a nice post about the matter here. Please remember to follow the story and call your local criminal in congress and tell them they are going to get fired in they don't behave.

http://www.campaignforliberty.org/profile/7786/blog/2012/01/19/day-internet-fought-back

Obamapy Wall Street Protester's And Aggressive Union Thugs Cost American Tax Payers Big Bucks

2012-01-13T07:16:00.001-08:00

January 13, 2012 A.D.

Our low-life communist community-organizer-in-chief, his unions thugs, and the Occupy Wall Street Protesters he incites to do harm across the country (Macy's for example) are now costing the American tax payer beaucoup bucks by sending out a military escort to protect a grain ship from their threats of aggression and terror.

The Daily News Online has the story of the Obama's community organizing terrorist threat here.

The purpose of the military is to protect the nation from attack. Clearly, the president and his terrorist friends hope to cause a ruckus or worse. Why else call out the military?

Is this part of Obama's attempted coup? Who the hell knows what communists and terrorists think.

Is the terrorist in the White House hoping for another Kent State?

http://tdn.com/news/local/protest-planned-for-first-ship-to-dock-at-egt-grain/article_e9b1d6e0-38d7-11e1-aac5-001871e3ce6c.html?oCampaign=hottopics

Proto-Stasi Department of Homeland Security To Monitor Blogs

2012-01-12T07:17:00.000-08:00

January 12, 2012 A.D.

The fascist totalitarians are not comfortable with freedom of speech. And the only people in this case who should be stopped from what they are doing are the criminal types who populate the Department of Homeland Security.

Which means every last one of them. First government lets in the criminal element (Muslims) then it monitors the rest of us because of it. Government is the state sponsor of terrorism and terror. The DHS is a tool of it.

Big Journalism has the update here.

http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2012/01/12/thursday-crib-sheet-dhs-is-monitoring-new-media-editor-during-phone-hacking-scandal-calls-breitbart-evil/

Warren Buffet Still Refuses To "Donate" His Wealth

2012-01-12T05:38:00.000-08:00

January 12, 2012 A.D.

The communist Warren Buffet (communism is theft writ large) has STILL not handed over his vast and unimaginable wealth to the federal government of the United States. Yet he pretends to us all that he wants to hand over more of it than he heretofore already has.

What is stopping him from getting rid of his wealth? Well apparently nothing but that he doesn't want to give it up.

It seems he wants others to do so before he does and has put out a challenge to congress (here). But the rest of us (rational people) don't want to hand our wealth over to the criminals in D.C. especially because none of us has as much as he does.

It is easy for him to bully others about handing over their money to the criminals in DC when he possesses so much. But when Christ told the wealthy man to give his money away he didn't tell him to give it to the criminals and thieves in government.
Christ told him to give it to the poor (not the government). Giving it to the government only enriches the government and leaves the poor poor and dependent on the state.

Which is, apparently, what Buffet continues to want to do. Asking people with less money than you to give theirs up first is not "giving" or benevolence. It is bullying people to do what you refuse to do yourself so that you never have to do it either (because you never wanted to in the first place or else you would have already done so).

Freely give it up Mr. Buffet. All of it (just to prove you are sincere). What? You say I should do it first? No way. I'm not asking others to give more money to the government. They don't deserve one dime more than they already have and no decent person would think otherwise. Yes, I'm saying you are not a decent man. I heard you are a cheap son-of-a-gun who paid your secretary some cheap wage while you rolled in dough.

So you give it up because you are insisting that others do it.

I'm merely challenging your hypocrisy and calling you out for it. My goal is to give less to the crooks in government. That is because I'm not evil like you.

http://swampland.time.com/2012/01/11/warren-buffett-to-mitch-mcconnell-put-up-or-shut-up/

Criminals Are Stupid

2012-01-02T07:20:00.000-08:00

January 2, 2012 A.D.

Many have heard and seen the crazy things dumb criminals do. Well, Naomi Wolf (author) and blogger (here) has got them (congress) at their best.

Please read her excellent article about congress voting for unlawful detention of American citizens (including themselves). Then quickly take a trip over to Oathkeepers online. They are going to do battle with the morons and criminal types who voted for the bill.

http://naomiwolf.org/2011/12/how-congress-is-signing-its-own-arrest-warrants-in-the-ndaa-citizen-arrest-bill/

http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2011/12/25/oath-keepers-launches-national-effort-to-recall-andor-remove-members-of-congress-who-voted-for-ndaa-military-detention-merry-christmas-u-s-congress/

Congress and Obama: Sponsors of Terror

2011-12-15T13:15:00.000-08:00

December 15, 2011 A.D.

The Guardian online is reporting here on new US legislation that proves the US government has gone rogue and is doing its best to finally and completely destroy the US Constitution by denying the right to a lawyer and to prove its case in a court of law. The Guardian only reports the story, but I'm telling you that is a rogue government that it doing this usurping.

There is absolutely no reason for the US government to strip US citizens, not only of their Constitutional rights, but their God-given rights. First, these are unalienable and any government acting in the manner that the rogue US government is doing is lawless. The government may not take away these God-give rights in this manner except by despotism.

This is a criminal act by the government. No law, nor 10,000 similar laws, will ever change the fact that the government is acting criminally.

It is tragic at every level. Both Democrats and Republicans are involved in this act of treachery. And the reason they pretend they have to do this is because they themselves continue to let the groups into this country who are the ones who commit these terrorists act. They let the Muslims into the country in the first place, they let the Chinese who hate us come in, and they let the disloyal Hispanics who don't care about the country come in. The terrorists hide among Hispanics but the government keeps letting them in anyway because they are a people easily bribed for votes by the Democrats.

If government continues to let in visitors and immigrants from groups hostile to our way of life then there will be terrorism. This is how the government itself will have sponsored the terrorists. If it wants to stop terrorism it merely has to shut the doors to terrorists. But it refuses.

The government WANTS the terrorists to come in so it can justify abolishing habeas corpus whenever it likes..

All we need is for the FBI to do what it always does: watch people and catch them in terrorist acts. I'm sorry, but if they don't catch them in time, that is the way it has to be. That is a price for liberty. And that is the price the government and the people have to pay for its negligence in letting these evil people in in the first place. Eventually, those who are terrorists will slip up and get caught and the problem will lesson over time as we put more American Muslims (in particular) in jail.

What about the Jihad Janes of the world? Nothing, if not an outright government hoax, to destroy the Constitution for.

But even then the problem is miniscule. At the most we are talking about a handful or so of American Muslims who wish to do us harm. To destroy the Constitution because a tiny percent of a small number of American Muslims who wish to do evil is to behave like the terrorists: irrationally.

The question at this point is whose side is the FBI and CIA on? Are they on the side of the state sponsors of terrorists--Congress and the President--or are they on the side of the Constitution they swore to uphold?

I challenge all current FBI, CIA, and Secret Service agents to prove their loyalty to the Constitution: do not have anything to do with exercising this criminal power congress and the president wish to exercise. You former service members should join Oath Keepers and prove to us that YOU are not the threat you think your fellow Americans are.

Be brave. Be courageous. Don't attack the Constitution because you are afraid to lose your paycheck or your retirement.

Pledge your sacred honor and your fortune to the American people and our precious freedom as did our Founders who threw off British tyranny and then wrote the Constitution you swore to uphold.

Or stop pretending you are loyal Americans and we are not.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/dec/15/americans-face-guantanamo-detention-obama

More Negligence From the Proto-Stazi Department of Homeland Security?

2011-11-29T01:39:00.000-08:00

November 29, 2011 A.D.

My last post called for the Department of Homeland Security to declare the president of the United States a threat for fomenting terrorism. This is because of his support for the lawless anarchists called the Occupy Wall Steet thugs who continue to protest around the country demanding other peoples money and so forth. Now we learn the bums are costing local government millions of dollars to protect citizens from their aggression, filth, and loitering.

And if law abiding Ron Paul supporters or people who advocate upholding the Constitution could be considered a threat, then certainly so should the president of the United States and his OWS comrades (one of whom recently threatened to burn down Macy's Department store in New York City).

Now, another influential "educated" Ivy League guy jumps into the fray with Obama on behalf of and in praise of the OWS. This time it's Cornell West. He is a radical Marxist professor I first learned about through Bill Buckley's Firing Line decades ago. The old buzzard (West) is still around spewing his "hatred" of white people and people with money.

This priviledged character now also compliments the OWS movement. He calls the movement "important" for finally solving the problem of economic inequality which the War on Poverty couldn't. I guess you could call it West's final solution.

Since the OWS movement is mostly white people, I take it that they are playthings to West. And since West is a Marxist (of the Socialist ilk), I take it that they must be very useful idiots as well. Read about Cornell West's comments here at Real Clear Politics (Hat Tip Drudge Report). He ups the ante of the OW Steeters by claiming that in order to solve the problems of poverty in America the "fight" has to be taken to "the streets". Oh really? Is that not inflammatory wording that if right-wingers used would nail them to some terrorist cross by a lunatic government official?

And what fight is that? Well, it's the fight for "entitlements".

According to West, Americans are entitled to things. Not just freedom, liberty, and rights before the law, but they are entitled to stuff. Other peoples stuff. Their money in particular. Or their local parks, if you wish to humor the OWS people.

But Mr. West, in his comments, didn't tell us where the Constitution says people have the right to get stuff from other people in the way that West suggests. He has written so many books he ought to know and should tell us when someone is robbed of their money for entitlements, from where the government has the authority to do it. West incites the people to fight for the stuff in the streets and, oops, if it gets real ugly and violent will he sit in his ivory tower and claim his innocense? Of course he didn't mean THAT kind of fighting. He meant like Ghandi. Or sit ins. And the such.

Oh dear reader. Marxists never mean such things. They do their dirty deeds by provoking the rabble and the poor to mayhem and murder. They do not want to dirty their own hands. They do their dirty deeds by provoking the young too.

But Ghandi had the right to his disobedience. The OWS doesn't. There is nothing being denied them that is not being denied me. And I am not demanding to fleece my neighbor. There is nothing denied them that is not being denied by offspring. And my offspring does not demand that the neighbor be fleeced for it. No. The OWS has a choice. A choice to chose between right and wrong even when that choice leaves them wanting and in need.

It's laughable. It really is. It is laughable because it is so utterly stupid. Yes, there are greedy rich people, but there are greedy poor people too. And West is stoking their passions. He is inciting them to rapine. It is not good to engender greed in anyone. West thinks otherwise.

This isn't about a righteous civil disobedience fight for unalieanble rights denied because of racism like in the 50s and 60s; it is about promoting criminal-mindedness among the poor. Perhaps West and Obama are frozen in time because of the well-deserved success of the Civil Rights Movement. And perhaps they think they can do the same thing with entitlements. But that isn't going to happen. Even if they are temporarily successful, they will only be successful in promoting criminal thinking and teaching the poor to behave like criminals. That is nothing to be proud of. It certainly has nothing to do with justice, equal or not.

It is one thing to provoke civil disobediance to obtain that which rightfully belongs you to, and another thing to promote it to obtain what doesn't belong to you. And that is what West is promoting. West thinks he is fighting like Ghandi against the British Imperialists. He isn't. He is fighting against his neighbors--his fellow citizens. Ghandi was fight against foreigners. In other words West is agitating for civil war.

Just because some rich people are getting away with it doesn't mean that poor people should be encouraged to do it as well. But that is what West and the Democrats believe.

No one has the right to take that which another has gotten lawfully. And you cannot just make it up and create a fiction that anyone with lots of money had to get it illegally or you are truly mentally disturbed. You would have to prove it case by case in order to prove you needed to codify taking away the wealth of the wealthy on a permanent basis. And that would be impossible. There is no entitlement to what Democrats think is owed. There is no place place in the Constitution where the people are to be guaranteed health care, pensions, jobs, or education. It just doesn't exist. And if it doesn't exist then to force other people to pay for them is a criminal act.

To do this West and Obama would have to overthrow the Constitution and abolish it and institute a new government so they can pretend that citizens are entitled to the things the OWS claim. Under our current laws that is sedition.

And that is why West and Obama are more a threat to the government of the people, by the people, and for the people than Ron Paul, third party candidates, or Tea Partiers. And if you say that the people have a right to be criminals and institute criminality as a basis of government you have corrupted what it means to be a people and are truly a threat to any nation.

Even if these terrorizers could change the Constitution to reflect their criminally-minded Marxist ideology, it would still be wrong. It would still be criminal-thinking. And that is the core of this issue: the criminal thinking of Obama, Cornell West, the Democratic Party, and Marxism.

It is always wrong to fight for wrong. And it is right to fight for right. The OWS, Obama, and West wish to fight for that which is wrong. The Tea Partiers or right wingers lawfully and peacefull fight for that which is right, and right wingers are practically labeled Nazis by Noam Chomsky (Mediate).

Obama and West provoke fighting in the streets and the Department of Homeland Security is silent.

What good is it for?

It is good only for brutality and evil. And that is why the Founders would abhor it and why they gave the government no power to create it.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/11/28/cornel_west_ultimate_fight_for_entitlements_will_be_in_the_streets.html

http://www.mediaite.com/online/oh-boy-noam-chomsky-compares-right-wing-media-to-nazis/

When Will the Department of Homeland Security Issue a Terror Alert About Democratic Party?

2011-11-16T22:35:00.000-08:00

November 17, 2011 A.D.

Not so long ago a Missouri Fusion Center, a proto-Stazi unit of the US government to which no decent nor loyal American works, issued a paper that got leaked to the public. The paper profiled groups in America that might allegedly spawn terrorism. What a joke that is since the most dangerous organization known to mankind throughout history is government and the government is not on the list of potential terrorists.

Anyway.

These allegedly potentially dangerous groups were those who supported third party candidates in elections, are avid supporters of the second amendment, loyal to the United States, and deeply interested in the Constitution. You know the type: they make tyrants and despots nervous.

I know. It's nuts. Because the real threat comes from communist subversives like our president who should at least be arrested for sedition and inciting riots.

The president of the United States has come out early in support of the anarchistic Occupy Wall Street movement. And now, a member of the OWS movement is threatening to burn down businesses in New York City. (New York Daily News).

This comes after weeks of violence, crime, pestilence, and lawlessness promoted from the highest levels in our government.

Clearly, it is the president of the United States who is the promoter of this terrorism. On the other hand, Ron Paul supporters participate in the political process through long held respectable and lawful means.

Obama agitates malcontents and nurtures hatred of others. And now, after having stoked the flames of hatred, envy, and violence, Obama's minions are ready to destroy. And Drudge Report is reporting tonight that one of Obama's proteges has been arrested for threatening to burn businesses in New York City. Thankfully there are still some in government who know what their responsibilities are.

Now will someone go arrest the low-life ring leader of the terrorist-spawning OWS: Barack Hussein Obama?

Why No Rational Person Wants To Travel With Obama's Fellow Negro Citizens On Public Transportation

2011-11-12T02:14:00.001-08:00

November 12, 2011 A.D.

Sorry for the headline. I don't make up the stories, I just write about them. I grew up in Detroit. I know the difference between riding buses with mostly white people and riding buses with blacks.

I don't do either anymore. Mostly because I don't need to. But Barack Hussein Obama and the Democrats would have us (force us) to ride with the thugs in the video linked to below (Hat Tip Drudge Report from the Chicago Tribune). He and they would force us to do this to control us. To herd us about collectively and to keep track of all our comings and goings. Totalitarians, dictators, fascists, and Communists are fond of such things. But the racial twist in this story is what poses the additional threat.

Now blacks themselves are a large victim group of black criminals and the old fella who got slugged by the young black animal was black. But blacks don't pick blacks merely because they prefer to brutalize them, it is because they are conveniently located to them.

Obama and the Democrats see European collectivist trains and transportation and see a functioning system. It functions well (at least for now) because there are mostly white people who travel on them. So public transport works relatively well with mostly white people. Or even with mainly Japanese people (you see?) in Japan. But not with blacks. Sorry. Really, I am. But I know the crime stats for blacks, whites, Hispanics, and Asians in America and I know I don't want to be forced to travel with blacks because of their crime rate.

Washington D.C. mass transit functions relatively well close to the capital and surrounding cities because of mass police. That is the only way it works unless you live in lily-white or rich areas of the country. Even then, if there are large black or even Hispanic communities that can get into the system, you are going to have trouble unless you have a police state thugs swarming all over the system. I don't want that. Good people don't want that. Bad collectivists like Obama do.

This is why mass transit is a bad idea, a waste of money, and mostly promoted by criminal types--those who ride the rails themselves and those who wish to fund them to rob us of the right to travel independently and safely in our locked, 2,000 pound vehicles.

I'm not picking on blacks here. Yes whites do the same things and commit the same crimes, but not at the high rate that blacks do. That makes black males, like the one in the video, especially dangerous.

As for the white lady in the station who stopped to help the man (the only one seen giving a hoot about an unconscious old man splayed out on the concrete landing), she is nuts to travel with blacks on trains in Chicago. Her time is running before she is assaulted and worse. I hope this made the impression on her that it should.

Traveling with Obama's fellow negro citizens is an entirely irrational decision.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/chi-video-shows-man-being-punched-at-red-line-stop-amid-laughs-and-taunts-20111111,0,5079572.story

Treasonous McCain Suggests Third Party in 2012

2011-11-09T06:58:00.000-08:00

November 9, 2011 A.D.

Evil doer and dirt-bag Council on Foreign Relations traitor John McCain says a third party might arise for the 2012 presidential election because of discontent among the American people. Oh gosh, what a genius. Third parties have been around for a long time. Let's all be surprised.

Steve Holland and David Alexander here at Reuters online write

"'The party [Republican], I think, has got to be a lot more responsive to the plight of the people,' said McCain, who lost the presidential race to Barack Obama three years ago this month."

Then the treasonous left-wing dirt-bag goes on to say that maybe the tax code ought to be reformed. Well why wasn't that done in the first place in George Bush 43's first term where there was a GOP congress? The GOP rank and file wanted that done since Ronald Reagan was in office.

I'll tell you why it didn't get done. It was precisely because of CFR traitors like John McCain who didn't care about the American people enough to push for reforming the tax code under Bush. The deranged monster appears to have been looking to pick a fight somewhere across the globe to feed his addiction to war. And when 9-11 happened within a year of GW's presidency, the major threat to the American people, the corrupt economy made the corrupt by congress, was ignored by the GOP and John McCain congress.

If he rots in hell he will surely have deserved it.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/11/08/us-washington-summit-mccain-idUSTRE7A77U820111108

Obama's Newest Totalitarian Police-State Jobs Program for the TSA

2011-10-26T18:29:00.001-07:00

October 26, 2011 A.D.

Glenn Beck's Blaze online is reporting on the recent comments made by presidential hopeful and Texas Congressman Ron Paul about the Transportation and Safety Administration. Paul calls officials running the new TSA checkpoints (0n our public roads) jack boots.

And they are. These people are not interested in our safety, they are only interested in a paycheck and their government pensions. Because if they were interested in our safety they would quit the police-state TSA organization and work to abolish it. No decent or moral man or woman works for it. Anyone who does is a criminally minded person.

The bigger threat to Americans is the TSA and the totalitarian police-state our our dangerous, extremist, and subversive Marxist president is creating.

Obama is the biggest national security threat we have.

There is so little terrorism in the USA the government even has to invent it by running operations and scams in which the government pretends it is going to blow up Americans (they really must get a kick out of it) and then rescues us in the nick of time. That's right, there is so little terrorism in America, except for the terrorism--real or pretended--generated by the US government, the TSA, and the Obama administration, that we'd be as safe as we have always been if it weren't for the government.

The TSA officials are the only terrorists I see hell bent on terrorizing us with their well known sexual molestations of the innocent at our airports and now the threat of getting us raped or our lives ruined as they drag us off the streets to jail for something only the TSA and the US government is guilty of: terrorism against Americans.

To be terrorism, innocent civilians have to be the target. And that is exactly what is going on here. And if you don't think that getting sexually molested by government perverts in the TSA, getting thrown in jail, threatened with rape and humiliation while in jail, financially ruined by court costs (after having lost your job) isn't as bad as getting blown up by some Muslim pervert co-religionist of Obama's dad, you don't think very much and are most likely an imbecile.

Many would rather be blown up by a Muslim pervert who adores an old dead guy that enjoyed sex with a nine year old than to be tortured and terrorized by a Marxist dirt-bag like Obama and his police-state pervert friends at the TSA for the rest of their lives.

You gotta really question the intelligence of Obama when he admires a religion whose founder enjoyed sex with a nine year old. It makes everything else that follows understandable. We understand why Obama promotes the sexual molestation of innocents at our airports when he honors a religion that promotes sex with children and trafficking in women.

Of course, if you are a Democrat, liberal, progressive, or a leftist, you don't know you are a deviant, pervert, and less than pond scum, so you don't know what I'm complaining about.

There is no terrorist threat but the one the government instigates itself through FBI scams, Muslim and Chinese immigration/visas, porous borders, and tampering in Middle East. If the government would stop practicing and promoting its own terrorist schemes actual threats by non-government agencies would remain as they always have in the past: few and rare and not to be addressed by a massive multi-billion dollar, totalitarian, police -state apparatus (think "infrastucture").

But then our terrorist "saviors" in the DHS and the TSA would lose their jobs and their jobs are much more important to them than a free American public enjoying unalieanble rights and the blessings of liberty.

They hate that. They cannot profit financially from a terrorism free America. They NEED terrorism to thrive. So they create it in order to justify their existence.

Obama cannot fully employ his jack boot terrorists at the TSA if the government doesn't insure a steady supply of alleged threats or supply real ones through immigration and negligence at the border.

We don't need the TSA to protect us . We can defend ourselves well enough if the US government would simply stop sponsoring terrorism on our soil against us.

May these days not be the beginning of our darkest hour at the hands of the totalitarian police-state criminals in Washington DC who now attempt to overthrow the American people and their Constitution through state sponsored terrorism by government agencies which profit richly from the wealth and power they seek to acquire.

We need to take names.

And when this is all over, we must never forget who these people are who threatened us with their terrorism.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/ron-paul-calls-tsa-jack-booted-thugs-in-response-to-highway-checkpoints/

Steve Jobs Speaks the Truth to Obama

2011-10-22T00:44:00.000-07:00

October 22, 2011 A.D.

Setting aside rich and powerful men like Donald Trump and Steve Wynn, it often takes a powerful man with one foot in grave and nothing to lose to confront a third world tin-horn despot and seditious tyrant like Barack Hussein (no relation to Saddam) Obama.

Donald Trump told Obama this week that he is basically a welfare queen (my term) for using public funds to campaign(Mediate). It quotes him as saying:

“Why isn’t his campaign paying for this, he argued,..."

Why?

I'll tell you why, because Obama is a criminally-minded low-life thug.

The president and his expensive wife in unseemly fashion blow through a lot of other peoples money. Surely it is not deserved. Surely it is immoral. And it is typical of low-life welfare cheats and tin-horn dictators.

Steve Wynn laid into our Welfare Queen in Chief and the Democrats this week calling Obama's economic plan "totally dishonest" (News Max). Gee. He just now figures out Obama is dishonest? That was discernible before Obama took office when he said he would take public dollars to run his last campaign if his opponent did. McCain did take public dollars to run but our Liar In Chief (to be) didn't.

Maybe Wynn suspected it earlier. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt.

And finally there is the late great Steve Jobs. He told Obama that Obama would likely be a one term president if he kept heading in the same direction (ABC News). Since Obama is still heading in the same direction I can only assume this is because he is stupid, evil, or both.

Most likely both. How stupid is it to ruin America? And how evil?

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/donald-trump-demands-obama-campaign-pay-for-bus-tour-its-a-fundraising-tour/

http://www.newsmax.com/StreetTalk/Wynn-Obama-dishonest-economy/2011/10/21/id/415290

http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/steve-jobs-biography-jobs-warned-obama-hed-term/story?id=14786074

Joseph Biden Constinues To Terrorize Women With Rape

2011-10-20T04:38:00.001-07:00

October 20, 2011 A.D.

It's basically extortion.

If you don't give me (the government) money I will terrorize you with threats of rape and murder.

Don't negotiate with terrorists.

What if the money isn't there? What then? Biden will have put it into the minds of criminals that they get to have a free for all.

Women, arm yourselves and be more cautious in public and when at home. And remember, the cops and the Marxists in the White House pose a more dangerous threat to you than the drug dealer down the street.

My fellow American women remember what last century taught you: the most dangerous people in life are not common criminals, nor even uncommon ones; the most dangerous people in the history of the human race is government.

The most dangerous people in the history of the human race is a government when it has seized absolute power. Washington D.C. has seized more and more absolute power and continues its quest to seize it all under Obama.

The most dangerous government is one which has the absolute power to sexually molest innocent women and children at airports. And has the absolute power to force your children away from the bosom of your home at gunpoint to attend school and learn to be deviants and communists. And has absolute power over what foods you may or may not put in your body. And absolute power over your choices for medical care. And absolute power over all your money, you financial transactions, how you use your own land, how you will purchase your home or not purchase it, how you will illuminate it, how you will heat it and cool it, and what you may or may not say and think.

My fellow American women, do not let Joseph Biden continue to terrorize you with threats of rape and murder.

Be courageous. Be willing to live free or die.

Even when you begin to see hyped stories in the government controlled media about the rapes and murders Biden is stirring up for the future if you don't hand over the money, don't let Biden terrorize you. If Biden was worried about crime he would advocate a moratorium on Hispanic immigration since Hispanics have about three times the violent crime rate of whites, but he is curiously silent about such a moratorium.

Really interested in reducing crime? Ban all Hispanic immigration. If you don't ban it, then you are NOT really interested in reducing crime and are actually promoting it.

A statistical summary of Hispanic criminal activity is found here at AmRen online. Okay, you don't like them. I get it. But who else is reporting about race and crime?

It is to be noted here that the Obama administration has gotten rid of many criminal illegal invaders who are Hispanic. But reducing crime in America means keeping out all bad immigrant groups that have a criminal reputation after they immigrate, for example: the Hispanics, the Hmongs, and Somalis. (Vdare)

Don't be moved that Biden is signaling to the criminals to begin their rampage of rape and murder if you don't hand over the dough. Depend on your own menfolk, depend on your own weapons, and be clever to avoid danger.

Governments are the biggest criminals of all time and threaten you the most.
So don't let them steal every last dime from you because of the threats they make against you by sending their dogs of hell against you.

Cops hate you anyway. They see you as a means to a paycheck. They want a high crime rate because it insures them money. They want you in jail because it is job security for them to have put you there, given you a criminal record, and the need afterward to hound you for the rest of your life because they made you a "criminal".

Don't let Joseph Biden terrorize you. Protect yourselves. Especially from the Marxists in the White House. Because we know that Marxism is responsible for the biggest crimes of the last century and all of history.

http://www.amren.com/features/hispanics/index.html

http://www.vdare.com/posts/somali-immigrants-damaging-to-america

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=46983 (Hat tip Drudge)

Rise in crime is a rise in black criminal activity:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=355449

Biden Warns About Cops (Rape, Murder, Crime, Etc.)

2011-10-12T20:37:00.000-07:00

October 11, 2011 A.D.

It is now being widely reported that Vice President Joseph Biden has put out a warning about the potential for a rise in crime if cities like Flint, Michigan lose more cops because of spending cuts. (The Weekly Standard).

Was that a threat?

Anyway.

So when they are not kept busy writing speeding tickets they find really bad things to do with their free time?

It's interesting that this topic is occurring at the same time that the Supreme Court is hearing a case about cops deviant habit of subjecting citizens to finger rape when they are in jail. Here is a Wall Street Journal story.

The most hilarious (or sick) comment of the year in regard to this case thus far is the comment by Justice Scalia who said about the defenders of sexual humiliation and abuse

""You want us to write an opinion that applies only to squatting and coughing. Is that it?"

It would be some image of Scalia squatting and coughing and perhaps getting finger raped by a deviant cop after being arrested and thrown in the poky for a minor offense. It would do well for the rest of us if these "justices" were treated to the exact same treatment regular folks are subjected to when manhandled by the deranged and depraved individuals who populate our law enforcement departments.

From the article at Find Law blog we learn that, "States, municipalities, and law enforcement interest groups, on the other hand, have filed briefs in favor of the blanket strip-search policy."

That would include searches of citizens for minor offenses (including things like not having a bell on a bicycle). Think of your lovely 15 year old daughter without a bell on her bike and a cop with the right to arrest her for it and strip her naked and finger rape her.

But of course the perverts and deviants in law enforcement and government want the strip searches of harmless individuals for minor offenses. How else will they get their deviant gollies and not get punished for it? If they didn't have a legal way to molest people they'd have to do it off the books and that might get messy and ruin their undue reputations as righteous people in the community.

Speaking of perverts, it seems cops and government might get jealous when other people get do the stripping. Here is another related story (Washington Post) from Detroit about mobile strip trucks. Apparently only the deviants in jail houses are supposed to run that sort of operation.

If cops and law enforcement officials are afraid to do their jobs without becoming evil, deviant, perverts and brutal monsters themselves, it is time for them to find new careers and find a more wholesome way to direct their perverted sexual urges.

I hope the high court rules against the cops, jails, and prisons.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/biden-warns-more-rapes-and-murders-if-jobs-bill-not-passed_595784.html

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204774604576627303439341720.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/detroit-police-impound-suspected-mobile-strip-club-catering-to-lions-football-tailgaters/2011/10/12/gIQAlcdveL_story.html

http://blogs.findlaw.com/supreme_court/2011/09/take-it-all-off-supreme-court-to-hear-prison-strip-search-case.html

Resource:

Here is a summary of the issue at SCOTUS blog:

http://www.scotusblog.com/2011/10/thoughts-on-the-strip-search-case/

Obama Plan Stupid? No. Obama Is Stupid

2011-09-27T19:41:00.000-07:00

September 27, 2011 A.D.

The Telegraph online from England is reporting that Germany thinks Obama's "economic" advice for Europe is "stupid". (Hat tip Drudge).

It isn't just stupid. HE (the president) is stupid. And Timmy the tax cheat commie pinko is stupid. And both of them are profoundly evil.

Which is why they do the stupid evil things they do.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financialcrisis/8793010/Germany-slams-stupid-US-plans-to-boost-EU-rescue-fund.html

Mysterious Aircraft Markings

2011-09-22T05:56:00.000-07:00

September 22, 2011 A.D.

Oh oh. Who dun it?

CBS Los Angeles is reporting about markings found under an airplane. They might be Arabic.

Okay, will the government official, union worker, or TSA employee who did that please fess up so the government doesn't outlaw invisible ink or magic tricks?

http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2011/09/21/knx-1070-exclusive-feds-probe-possible-arabic-type-markings-on-southwest-jets/

Mark Steyn on Hugh Hewitt: Trashing Ron Paul and the Constitution

2011-09-15T04:58:00.001-07:00

September 15, 2011 A.D.

It's one thing to hear Hugh Hewitt (left wing interloper who claims to be a conservative) trash Ron Paul, but a whole other thing to hear Mark Steyn do it. Heretofore, I considered Mark Steyn one of the most intelligent "conservatives" on talk radio.

But he just got kicked down a notch, apparently by himself. Yesterday, on Hewitt's show, Mark dismissed the Constitution. And he did it to trash Ron Paul. It's one thing not to like Paul, it's another thing to diss the Constitution to do it. And Mr. Steyn when you diss my Constitution you make an enemy of yourself to the American people and the Constitution.

Steyn said:

But I don’t think he’s engaged by foreign policy at all, and I think this is, the idea that America can be a 19^th Century isolationist republic is absurd.

The word "isolationist" is a red herring used by evil types to deride those who do not believe in murdering foreigners in unjust wars or wars that are not our business. It's used as a slander of those who disapprove in tampering in the sovereign internal affairs of other countries. Ron Paul is actually in favor of greater relationships with foreign governments. This is about an eternal moral issue and is not one based on any unique contemporary moral standards. What is true outside the technological age is still true during it. It is a requisite nature of moral truths that it be for all time, otherwise it isn't truth. The moral truth we are addressing is the sovereignty of foreign nations, even ones we do not like. We read about this old story in in the Old Testament. God did not use great nations to police the world. He used bad nations to punish evil nations.

This is what Mark Steyn, Hugh Hewitt, and the whole host of alleged conservative media elites would have the US role to be: that of an evil doer nation used as a sword against other evil doer nations. That was not so with the God of our fathers, the seed of Abraham, in the Old Testament except for the founding of the land of Israel. And even in that case, God says that he drove out most of those people before hand.

Will we soon hear Steyn suggest that God's word is obsolete too because it's even older than the 19th century? May God forbid it.

Steyn follows his last foolish comment quoted above up with a mish mash of disconnected thinking which I quote at length only to show how stupid the rationale is. It would be better to say that there is no rationale in his comments as they apply to Paul and the Constitution.

Steyn says:

America has two relatively benign neighbors, and yet 70% of the population of Mexico has moved north across the southern border, and 100% of every single bad Canadian idea has moved south across the northern border. Things that would be uniquely Canadian absurdities forty years ago, like multiculturalism and government health care, are now embedded in American politics. So the idea that Ron Paul’s view of the Constitution can hold the planet at bay, I think, is the biggest defect in his whole pitch.

The idea, if I'm correct, is that even if mild neighbors can so greatly impact us, think what evil doers further away can do.

But the problem isn't the Constitution. The problem is disobeying it. Which is something Ron Paul NEVER does. The problem is traitorous leaders, which Ron Paul isn't.

And what Ron Paul is doing isn't a pitch. It's called the rule of law. Ron Paul has sworn to uphold the Constitution. It's not a sales pitch. Every vote the congressman has ever made is done in light of the every word of the Constitution and with the utmost fidelity to it. To expect anything less of our government officials is corrupt. Would to God Almighty that each congressman who has sat in the federal legislature had done so since the beginning. What Mark Steyn appears to be advocating is the overthrow of the Constitution because it appears to him to be irrelevant. According to Steyn's reasoning, since it isn't the quaint old 19th century then following the Constitution is impractical or illogical.

Well, it is irrelevant only when people like Steyn (Pelosi, Reed, Obama, Bush, etc.) think it is or should be.

If the Constitution does not apply to today's world the Constitution itself provides the means to change it so it can apply: the amendment process. Thus, there can never be anything obsolete about the Constitution. He said that Ron Paul's retreat to the Constitution and the Constitutional era is not sufficient to deal with the world events around us. Ah, only Mark Steyn's brain is.

You understand it now, don't you?

But I thought that green card holders or those trying to get into the United States had to prove they would uphold our Constitution? Seems like Steyn might be as evil and stupid as those dumb Mexicans who run over the border pregnant and squat down over the line to drop their loads so they can pretend they are Americans instead of burglars.

Maybe it is time to deport Mark Steyn?

We have enough people born here (Obama, Pelosi, Reid, etc) trampling the Constitution and it seems to me we don't need to bring in clever foreigners with British accents to help them. It's enough to deal with the low IQ Hispanics brought in by the tens of millions by traitors in our government to plunder our wealth, steal our heritage, rob our posterity of its treasure, traditions, and culture. These will be used by these same political elites to annex, first, large swaths and then all of the US to a regional government because of the loyalty of Hispanics to nearby foreign governments. Thus we don't need snotty people under the British Crown telling us our Constitution stinks. We already dealt with those kinds of people long ago.

We didn't like their corrupt thinking.

Criminally-Minded Congressman Jan Schakowsky

2011-09-15T04:15:00.000-07:00

September 15, 2011 A.D.

WLS channel unwittingly (I assume) exposed the criminal nature of the Democratic Party. In the online text of an interview with the Congressman Schakowsky, we read that which all Democrats really think of Americans and their property and we know this because of their decades of devotion to it.

To quote the criminally-minded congressman, Jan Schakowsky:

"I’ll put it this way. You don’t deserve to keep all of it [your money] and it’s not a question of deserving because what government is, is those things that we decide to do together."

The woman is depraved or demented. I'm just not sure. But she most certainly has a criminal mind. (Of course she does as one cannot be a Democrat and not have one).

And she is certainly ignorant about our form of government.

First. We the people have surrendered certain rights (like the right of corporate self-defense--the military--to the government voluntarily. It is a right that belongs to us a priori before government was ever established. This idea was thoroughly discussed by our founders and the knowledge of it shows up at the top of the Constitution (in the preamble) in the form of the words "...in Order...to insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defence...".

And just how did the Constitution intend to provide for the common defense?

Through the Democratic Party's plundering our wages?

No. Through tariffs.

But far be it from the witch to know that. Maybe she spends too much time at her cauldron stirring her foul recipes of criminal thought and not enough time reading history books. Perhaps she is too busy counting dead fetuses to study the Federalist papers. Or maybe is to so busy going to homosexual marriage ceremonies that she hasn't had time to read the writings of James Madison or Thomas Jefferson.

Whatever it is that distracts her from knowing how the government she is sworn to uphold works, it got in the way of her hiding her criminal thinking.

Second. We the people loaned that right to corporate self-defense to the government and not so that witches like the Congressman could club us over the head with it. And the little witch might not know it but we can take that right back any time criminal types like her in government abuse this trust we lent to them. Our founders provide us a guide to how that is done (i.e. The War of Independence from tyrants).

Third. We the people deserve all the property that we acquire lawfully. And only criminals (thieves, robbers, thugs, evil doers, hell-bound sinners, Karl Marx, Adolf Hitler, Mao, Stalin, Castro, Communists, fascists, Democrats, or collectivists) think otherwise.

And finally, if Americans don't deserve every dime they lawfully acquire, surely the witch Schakowski doesn't deserve one dime of public money, the trust her people have given her, her office, her privilege, her power, or the honor of serving her people.

The people of her district need to disabuse her of the money she thinks other people owe her. They need to fire her as soon as possible.

Ban the criminally-minded from public office. And do it today.

http://www.wlsam.com/Article.asp?id=2285496

Dangerous and Extremist Janet Napolitano Continues to Give the Nuremberg Defense For TSA Molestation

2011-09-08T05:03:00.001-07:00

September 8, 2011 A.D.

Janet Napolitano is at it again.

She is either one of the dumbest people in the Obama administration or one of the most evil. And with so many choices it's hard to decide. Not only does she continue to violate the fourth amendment rights of innocent citizens, she ups the ante with her promotion of sexual molestation during those searches and continues to find herself the target of severe criticisms which never seem to impact her status as a compassionate human being. You would think she might feel a pang of guilt or find the burden of being so evil too heavy and resign. But, apparently, it is easy for her to be evil. It's something I do not understand.

In a recent article in Forbes by Kashmir Hill and at Politico online (Josh Gerstein) Napolitano continues to justify these things with the same type of rationalization Nazis used to absolve themselves of their sins. They were just following orders. But for Napolitano, it's that procedures have been "thoroughly vetted". Oh, well, then everything must be okay.

And stuffing Jews and others into trains and so forth wasn't thoroughly vetted by the German government? These things were occurring against the wishes of the Fuhrer? Is that what I'm to believe?

You can be sure I do not.

Wikipedia has this passage on its page about the Nazis and their authorized transportation policies (and the apparent "thorough vetting" that went on):

Deportations on this scale required the coordination of numerous German government ministries and state organisations, including the Reich Security Main Office (RSHA), the Transport Ministry, and the Foreign Office. The RSHA coordinated and directed the deportations; the Transport Ministry organised train schedules; and the Foreign Office negotiated with German-allied states about handing over their Jews.

In other words government authorized these things. Transportation underlings executed orders merely because they were authorized to do so. Surely there is no order to rape women, but everything else TSA underlings are ordered to do is one small step short of rape. And that is the tragedy of this.

Good luck to the blogger in the above article for going up against the imperial court and imperial bureaucracy who view her as something to molest or plunder and not necessarily in that order. I sure hope she isn't making up that a TSA worker raped her. Not only because it is terrifying for travelers to hear about these things and we need to protect ourselves from a criminal and rogue government which exposes us to dangers worse than we might face without them, but also because it would make the government look beleaguered and innocent, which it is not. And that would further delay putting the government in its proper place as protector of the people and not the abuser of them.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/kashmirhill/2011/09/06/female-blogger-threatened-with-a-defamation-suit-for-blogging-about-tsa-rape/

http://www.politico.com/blogs/joshgerstein/0911/Janet_Napolitano_Drudge_is_just_wrong_on_privacy.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocaust_train

Lone Wolf Obama Preps Government To Destroy Tea Party Folks

2011-08-19T16:06:00.000-07:00

August 19, 2011 A.D.

If you thought the lone wolf was dangerous, imagine how dangerous he is when he finally joins up with the wolf pack for the big hunt. Such is the situation with our lone wolf president Barack Hussein Obama.

Lone Wolf Obama revealed his desire destroy Tea Party folks this week at a political event. You can see the conversation here at a USA Today blog. When government officials opening choose to lie about law abiding citizens, that government is mentally prepared to destroyed them.

In the video, the president excuses Joseph Biden's recent claim that the Tea Party folks are behaving like terrorists. And he excuses it by blaming Tea Party folks for calling him a socialist. Now, it is one thing to tell the truth about someone and another to lie about them. Calling Obama a socialist is truth telling. Calling the Tea Party folks terrorists is lying. Our lone wolf president doesn't see the difference. And that is because he is morally depraved.

Our president, like an impudent child caught with his hand in the cookie jar, defends his bad behavior by falsely accusing others. He says in the video clip that the rhetoric needs to be toned down. So is he saying his administration supports lying about the Tea Party folks because they are lying about him and if they stop lying about him he will stop lying about them? Or is he saying that both the Tea Party folks and his administration are telling the truth about each other but everyone simply needs to tone it down a bit?

All this kind of thinking from Lone Wolf Obama fuels the predatory emotions of FBI agent's, cops, DHS and TSA officials, and the Fusion center Stasi who depend on a frightened and terrified American populous for a living. Always follow the money. If government agencies prosper and careers are made because bogey man terrorists exist everywhere around us, then the only way to continue to prosper and advance ones career is to invent more terrorists when the supply runs low.

Lone Wolf Obama knows this. And so does his newly adopted wolf pack.

Government workers are being prepped to murder Americans or destroy them through the courts or their wallets. Lone Wolf Obama continues to claim that it was the Tea Party which refused to compromise about the debt ceiling.

But isn't it true that if two groups or individuals have an impasse it means neither of them is compromising? And thus if the mythological Tea Party powerhouse in congress was being terrorists then the Democrats were too? In Lone Wolf Obama's twisted thinking it does. If there was a delay in raising the debt ceiling because Democrats refused to compromise they were themselves (according to Obama's standard of thinking) terrorists. All Democrats had to do was reduce spending and the debt ceiling would have quickly been raised. The truth would be, then, that Democrats held up the process as much as the Republicans and all were thus terrorists. But being evil, Obama and Biden couldn't be that fair minded about it.

I knew many people during this time who were terrified when Lone Wolf Obama threatened that social security checks might not come out. He couldn't guarantee it! No! And old people were sickened by his words. The president bullied old people to make a political point. And the Tea Party folks are targets of government condemnation?

Only in world where right is wrong and wrong is right and Lone Wolves become president of the USA does a president intentionally terrify old frail folks to move legislation along and then blame others for terrorizing people.

If you vote for Lone Wolf Obama who is now heading up the wolf pack then you have a criminal mind. And if you didn't realize it before you can realize it now. The question is will you turn from your evil ways?

http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2011/08/obama-clashes-with-tea-party-member/1

Lone Wolves are Pussy Cats Compared to the Wolf Pack

2011-08-17T19:52:00.000-07:00

August 17, 2011 A.D.

Everywhere the stenographers (hat tip R. Limbaugh) in the mainstream media are repeating the demented ramblings of our president Barack Hussein (no relation to Saddam) Obama. Perhaps his idiotic statements generate much income for them like when everyone tunes into a TV channel to watch a car chase in Los Angeles. Or when the government incinerates women and children in a "compound" in Waco, Texas. But repeating his comments over and over does not really edify us.

The Blaze (Glenn Beck's new website) is also reporting on the story and you can read the comments about the security worries of the president as we approach the ten year mark for the 911 attack on the Twin Towers in New York City.

Naturally, the president wants to make monsters out of others and never himself--a committed Marxist and Communist (a group known for its mass murder, theft, rape, and torture the innocent by the hundreds of millions). And yet, thus, or so he wants to make the scary story of the day about white people (whom he hates) who call themselves Christians (of which is not one) and demonize gun ownership (he wants to take guns from citizens).

White people in America have the lowest crime rate next to Asian Americans. Never mind that blacks and Hispanics have the worst rate. Yet he isn't alerting us to their murders, rapes, and destruction. No, the emphasis is whitey. Blacks and Hispanics run around with high rates of slaughter and mayhem, but we are supposed to focus on the white bogey man.

Our imbecile in chief doesn't seem to think the rioting and killing overseas by mostly non-whites in England is as problem either. That danger by dark foreigners is not to be noticed. Killing that happens over there is only a problem when white people do it. Don't you worry about that sort of violence which is happening currently since mostly non-whites are committing it (the media is reluctant to report this). Then there is the slaughter of citizens by mostly non-white government officials (the wolf pack) of mostly nonwhite citizens in the Middle East. That shouldn't worry you either. It's the white guy who is the problem according to our president. Governments all over the Middle East are attacking their citizens and threatening more lives than lone wolves, but the president isn't going to warn you that government is the biggest threat.

Never mind that the wolf pack (government) is always more dangerous than the lone wolf. The wolf pack (Obama is a member of it), having slaughtered nearly 100 million unarmed citizens last century and enslaving as many is not supposed to get our attention. A measly white guy is. And we are to strip the American people of their liberty and freedom and establish a police state which can easily murder hundreds of thousands or more to "protect" us from one lone nut (read: white guy) who might kill a handful of people.

And don't think of the D.C. sniper either.

While Obama fuels, feeds, and funds the wolf pack which can murder masses of people at any moment given the right circumstances, we are supposed to worry about a lone wolf from one of the more law-abiding groups in America: white folks.

That is the thinking coming from the criminal mind of Barack Hussein Obama--a member of the wolf pack who belongs to the Democratic Party. The party responsible for 50 million or so lives snuffed out "legally" in the womb. It's the same party that loved war last century and sent of hundreds of thousands of white Americans to their deaths to kill hundreds of thousands of white folks overseas.

The wolf pack is always more dangerous and destructive than the lone wolf.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/obama-worried-about-lone-wolf-attack-as-911-approaches/

The Surveillance State (In the U.K.)

2011-07-30T11:35:00.000-07:00

July 30, 2011 A.D.

There is really something horribly wrong with any individual who thinks it is a good idea to record and monitor the "vehicular" (cops love to use that term and put the accent on "hick") comings and goings of every law abiding citizen around them. A town in England has set up cameras to record the license plate of every car that passes in and out of their town. Anna Edwards of the Daily Mail online ( out of the U.K.) has the story here.

I'd like to chalk it up to apparent insanity. Or some deviant interest in others (peeping-Toms), but there is something truly depraved and evil working in the mind of a person who cannot live with the fact that everyone around them should go about their day without being monitored by "officials".

Local businessmen and women lobbied for the cameras, but they don't run them. The government does. And the government collects the data, not the businesses. This is the difference between individuals being responsible for their daily lives and the state being responsible (which translates into everyone being irresponsible).

Naturally, the tragedy in this story is not the theft of goods or assaults that rarely happen in the little community (which appears to have fallen victim of inter-breeding), but the behavior of government officials who, given the power they wield, use it to destroy liberty.

But seriously folks, if you cannot figure out how to run a small business safely in a peaceful town with a low crime rate while not burdening those around you with your depraved need to control everyone around you, you really are too stupid to run your own business and need to go find a new line of work that doesn't take too much thinking.

Like government work.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2020167/Big-Brother-watching-Every-car-Royston-tracked-police.html

TSA Perverts Surrendering Some of Their "Fun" (Molesting Kids Wasn't Popular With the Public)

2011-07-28T18:35:00.000-07:00

July 29, 2011 A.D.

Bravo for the American public.

The perverts at the TSA are talking about using new procedures at our airports (instead of sexually molesting innocent children and so forth). Here is an article about it at Politico by Josh Gerstein. One excerpt reads:

"The federal government is planning to introduce new behavior detection techniques at airport checkpoints as soon as next month, Transportation Security Administration chief John Pistole said Thursday."

Apparently the Israeli model of screening for behavior of passengers might be used at some US airports. The Politico article makes a brief mention about religious profiling (duh) and how it might not work here because [because left wingers are morons].

TSA and DHS administrators are imbeciles. But as we have seen for a very long time imbecility is a prerequisite for leadership roles in the US government. Imbeciles need work too. We cannot just have them roaming the streets.

Still, my apologies to imbeciles everywhere who do not work in government. It's not their fault government imbeciles are such...uh...imbeciles.

If the government wanted to stop terrorism it would get out of the Middle East because that is what causes it. Since we are still there, it means government is happy with terrorism. This puts them in a bind because if we leave the Middle East how could they justify stripping Americans of their rights, destroying the Constitution, or setting up a totalitarian police state? That would simply be no fun for the despots. Despots have nightmare scenarios too. Only they are opposite of what normal people fear. Cranky despots (especially ones with nukes or rubber gloves) are a real problem for the rest of us who don't like thugs, bullies, perverts, and criminal types in government.

Furthermore, the state sponsored terrorism by the US government currently underway against the American people viz a viz the phony war on terror is also the government's newest best jobs program.

Thus the feds are not going to give up their state sponsored terrorism against we citizens so easy since it is so simple (and apparently fun) to scare American women into hysterical subjugation and slavery by letting a terrorist nearly blow someone up every so often. The government knows what every Muslim in America is doing all the time and they want it this way. The Stasi (the DHS) always knows what we all are doing all the time.

The US government must create a steady supply of almost-terrorists or the Stasi-DHS will not have enough work to do to collect a paycheck and make our lives miserable. Someone once said to follow the money. And for the Stasi/DHS and terrorism, follow it closely.

US citizens in government are making a fine living off of sponsoring terrorism and they are not going to easily give up creating terrorists or even almost-terrorists if it means they will have to find honest work like the rest of us.

Resources:
http://www.wired.com/politics/security/magazine/16-02/ff_stasi?currentPage=all

http://www.fff.org/freedom/fd1104b.asp
(hat-tip Antiwar.com)

Commander In Thief Summons Boehner Again

2011-07-12T09:38:00.000-07:00

June 12, 2011 A.D.

"President" Obama still wants new taxes.

It's the spending, stupid.

Another Day, Another TSA Molestation

2011-07-10T19:38:00.000-07:00

July 10,2011 A.D.

A TV station out of Seattle called King 5 has reported another frisking of a small child. True, the child wasn't the usual lily-white blond the TSA officials are happy to molest. Still we are not told if the parents are Muslims.

If the government is acting on "intelligence" (okay, don't laugh, I don't mean that kind of intelligence) the question to ask is were the parents Muslims. If they were not Muslims there was likely no reason to frisk anyone especially the child. And where was the warrant that this family was a threat?

Let the airline companies handle this problem. And keep foreign Muslims (visitors, students, workers, and "dignitaries") out of the country. Permanently.

http://www.king5.com/video/featured-videos/Kirkland-family-says--125274814.html

Criminal Congress Continues to Usurp Powers

2011-06-29T02:32:00.000-07:00

June 29, 2011

The thugs and mobsters in congress who don't have enough to do mucking up our lives on the economic front and making us miserable with their over reach, are this week butting into child rearing and the cribs our babies will sleep in (Today Moms online).

I guess when you are as responsible for the slaughter of approximately 50 million innocent unborn in the womb as Democrats are you might need to pretend you possess a shred of decency regarding innocent baby life. And so the baby-killers--the Democratic Party under the dangerous and extremist Barack Insane Obama--are now regulating the kind of baby cribs Americans can buy.

This could be a desperate and futile attempt by Democrats to prove they are humane individuals. Too late. That is impossible. There is far too much blood dripping from their fetus-murdering hands.

Besides that, only an imbecile believes that the Constitution gives the federal government the right to regulate cribs. That is, of course why, obviously, the Democratic Party pushed it. The whole national government and the people would have to be at risk of collapse for government to reach in and grab this power to regulate cribs. And, believe me, the government will not collapse even if the number of babies who died is doubled, or tripled--tragic as it would be. It is simply impossible that government would cease to function and the whole of the people suffer if more babies died in cribs. And that is the bar for general welfare and defense to kick in. This crib business doesn't apply to the commerce clause either. And thus there is no constitutional defense for the criminal over reach, abuse, and usurpation by congress.

You can murder a million babies each year for decades if you are a member of the Democratic Party, but their heathen god forbid that a handful of babies die each year accidentally in a crib.

If congress can regulate cribs it can regulate everything. And no one in their right mind believes that the founding generation believed the Constitution allowed for that. Which is why you find the Democrats (mostly) approving of it. They hate the Constitution.

The mother (Susan Cirigliano) who started this push for national legislation is quoted as saying ""I was a normal mom raising her kids. Never in a million years would I have thought that could happen to me."

Well now there's the source of the problem: the dumb mother. Any intelligent mother understands that there will be a myriad ways for a baby to die in its sleep.

It is shameful for congress to take and pervert the tragedies of individuals (especially stupid ones) as an excuse to trample the Constitution. The purpose of it is to seize more totalitarian powers via such tragedies which if criticized make monsters out of the critics instead out of the subversives and dangerous extremists in the White House and Congress who ruthlessly and diabolically take advantage of them.

The world is falling apart and the baby-killer perverts and deviants in the Democratic Party think the national effort should focus on a handful of crib deaths. Congress and the president continue to murder innocent babies in the Middle East to prove their cruel powers. And yet, the whole nation must bow to their wishes about accidental deaths.

The Three Stooges had a delicious description of really stupid people and it applies perfectly to these jokers in Congress. The term was "stupid idiots".

Which, apparently is worse than being stupid or idiotic.

http://moms.today.com/_news/2011/06/28/6964480-strict-new-crib-regulations-take-effect-today-does-your-crib-pass-the-test

TSA Has Elderly, Sick, and Dying Woman Remove Adult Diaper

2011-06-26T19:50:00.000-07:00

June 26, 2011 A.D.

And who is surprised.

Read about this latest adventure by the deviants and perverts at the TSA here at the News Hearld online.

No normal person thinks that this woman would have had a bomb in her diaper. Was she a Muslim? If not, she was no threat. There are no cases--absolutely none--on earth nor in all of history where a non-Muslim elderly woman dying of leukemia was found to have a bomb hidden in her soiled adult diaper.

So if the government is saying that they base their actions on information or facts from the past then they are lying because no such situation has ever occurred where a non-Muslim woman, age 95, dying of leukemia was packing a bomb.

Thus there was no probable cause for the "search" (i.e. sexual assault). The perverts violated the woman's 4th Amendment rights. They are the terror we fear. The only reason for these actions is the perversion and deviancy of president Obama and Janet Napolitano. who being perverts and deviants themselves, are befuddled that those who are not perverts and deviants are deeply disturbed by the TSA actions.

A TSA official whose name is Sari Koshetz (the last of which sounds remarkably like Co-shits) and seems highly suitable for someone who justifies molesting an old woman with soiled diapers, is quoted as saying that the, "TSA cannot exempt any group from screening because we know from intelligence that there are terrorists out there that would then exploit that vulnerability,"

Is Co-shits serious that TSA actions have anything to do with intelligence?

With shits for brains, how can that be possible? Does Co-shits know of one case on earth where an elderly non-Muslim female American was hiding a bomb in her soiled diapers? If not, Shits-for-brains is a liar and a dumb one too.

A perfect person to work for the Obama administration.

UPDATE: 6-27-11
It appears the perverts at the TSA didn't "actually" assault the poor, dying, old woman this time (if you don't think wrestling her out of her diaper counts), they only made her travel without underwear. This one seems to have gotten away from them. Read about it here at CNN online. The TSA folks can get their jollies in all sorts of perverse ways.

http://www.newsherald.com/news/mother-94767-search-adult.html
http://www.cnn.com/2011/TRAVEL/06/27/florida.tsa.incident/index.html

UPDATE: 6-29-11
The TSA still defends mistreatment of the old woman who was forced to take off her adult diaper (CNN). The molesters were sensitive. They were extremely sensitive. Yes, it reminds me of the kinds of stories Solzenitizen would tell about prisoners being let go from prison camps. They were set free. Naked and without food or water. In Siberia. They were free! Free to die.

The old woman was cornered. Cornered at the edge of a cliff. She had two choices and two choices only: she could walk off it herself or they would push her. Either way it was done with extreme politeness and sensitivity.

Well, that is all that matters.

Oh, and they were professional too. So where Hitler's concentration camp thugs. They were highly professional and according to their government obeying all laws.

Apparently, in the warped mind of a leftist, you can sexually assault people if you are sensitive, polite, and professional.

http://articles.cnn.com/2011-06-26/us/florida.tsa.incident_1_pat-down-tsa-pat-downs-tsa-officer?_s=PM:US

Sheila Jackson Lee: Moron

2011-06-19T06:23:00.000-07:00

June 19, 2011

Congressman Sheila Jackson Lee thinks Christian militants want to bring down the U.S. government like Muslim Jihadists (Hat tip Drudge Report).

Here is a link to the video at You Tube from CNS News online.

She says at the end "the issue is whether their [the Christian 'militants'] intent is to undermine the laws of this nation".

Well if that's the criteria then it is Sheila Jackson Lee herself who is the dangerous militant. One simply cannot be a member of the Democratic Party and not be undermining the laws of this nation on a continual basis.

I submit to a candid world that Sheila Jackson Lee is probably a terrorist by her own definition. Now will someone please go arrest her and her fellow terrorists in the Democratic Party and put them on trial for subversion and trying to undermine the laws of this nation?

Jonathan Strong writes this article about Jackson Lee at Lew Rockwell on line. In it he tells a story about her constantly calling an employee a "stupid motherfucker".

Someone should hold up a big mirror to her face when she says something like that.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBAmPxSI8bo&feature=player_embedded

http://www.lewrockwell.com/spl3/congressional-boss-hell.html

Alert to Janet Napolitano

2011-06-15T05:06:00.000-07:00

Stay away from little, bald, religious men in brightly-colored flowing gowns.

From Andrew Breitbart online (Hat tip Drudge) we read an article titled "Dalai Lama mistakes Australian PM for a man".

No, there was no sexual molestation at transport hubs involved. At least none that was reported.

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.ee00cd993c4221a5ac150a9aab17ca0b.601&show_article=1

Don't Give Our Criminally-Minded Thug-In-Chief Any Ideas

2011-06-14T07:20:00.000-07:00

June 14, 2011 A.D.

The Chinese government, unbeknown to its citizens (it's decent ones of course), has been putting spying equipment in automobiles to keep track of people who might do free things or think free thoughts. This is not permitted. Read about that here at the Epoch Times online. Hat-tip Drudge.

Our dictator-for-another-day, president Barack No-Relation-To-Saddam Obama might be jealous of that. We already know that our dangerous and extremist "presidential" thug and bully wishes to force his thoughts down our throats like a rapist wishes to force his person on the unwilling by this latest revelation that we will be forced to hear from the White House or Feds by cell phone. Free Republic has a blurb about that here.

We also know he hates it when people think they ought to be free from his thoughts and intents or directives. And we are supposed to do what he tells us to do, not what we decide we wish to do.

Just like a true communist pig and fascist.

http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/china/chinese-spying-devices-installed-on-hong-kong-cars-57587.html

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2717958/posts

Retard Found At US Airport

2011-06-11T17:15:00.000-07:00

June 11, 2011 A.D.

The retard isn't the 29 year old man with the intelligence of a two year old trying to see Mickey Mouse; the retard is the TSA official with the intelligence of an amoeba who took away the 29 year old's plastic hammer.

Read about that here --a local Fox News affiliate via You Tube.

This video is like a Highlights magazine search drawing, only for terrorists. Pick out and circle who is terrorizing whom. (Hint: the people with the ~~brown~~ blue shirts/costumes with badges are the terrorists.)

Ms. Janet Napolitano. If it doesn't stink to be you, you are not paying attention.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvkvAC8KTP8&feature=player_embedded

Is That You, Janet Napolitano?

2011-06-10T18:49:00.000-07:00

June 10, 2011 A.D.

A man on board an airplane stripped himself naked while in flight. My Fox New York has the story here.

But Napolitano is a woman. Yes. But, she is easily mistaken for a man and someone who hasn't a shred of decency or modesty, or is out of his or her ever-loving mind.

http://www.myfoxny.com/dpp/news/passenger-strips-naked-on-flight-20110610-ncx

Obama's Third World Tin-Horn Dictator Security State?

2011-06-09T05:10:00.000-07:00

June 9, 2011 A.D.

What's this in the UK's Telegraph online and why isn't it being reported by the major "mainstream" media outlets in the USA?

It alleges that nearly 2,000 old folks, who no one in their RIGHT MIND would think are terrorists, were abused (terrorized) by the US government for the sake of our country's security, of course. Sadly these days no one (in their right mind again) would be surprised that our government transportation security officials were terrorizing innocent people like this even if the story isn't true.

The Telegraph writes:

They [the victims] complain that they were “herded like animals” and made to stand for hours in temperatures up to 80F with no food or water or access to lavatories.

I suppose we can be grateful they didn't herd them into the showers--Nazi style.

Then we read:

...one lady asked in desperation whether she could use a bathroom, one immigration official is said to have replied: “Do it over the side, we won’t mind."

Ah. Well. Small favors. The Nazis made transportation captives urinate on themselves. At least our Nazi impersonators gave the innocent the option of peeing overboard.

As you might know if you are an informed and concerned human being (unlike monsters guilty of abusing old folks) the humiliation or violation of the innocent (especially in matters of elimination, modesty, or sexual privacy) is a key characteristic of a government poised to commit mass murder.

Now, there should be about 2,000 witnesses to the abuse that occurred. So why don't we hear about it on television news reports here in America? Are they too busy fantasizing about the pervert congressman and his sex organ? Or are they too busy chasing down the ex-vice presidential candidate who they hate because she didn't slaughter her birth-defect baby in the womb?

Just what is distracting them from reporting the Nazi-ish totalitarian thugs in the government?

I suspect most of these terrorized folks were white people. And we already know that our president likes to frighten old white folks. Most old white folks I know are terrified about what is happening to them. President Obama's terrorizing elderly whites grows more sadistic by the day. Maybe it is latent hatred for his white grandparents who raised him? The nerve of them. Who did they think they where.

Whatever it is that drives his racial hatred of white people (it's probably the Marxism), it is hard to understand how he gets away with it from the Oval office.

But he does.

One gets the impression that our president thinks terrorizing old white people is funny. And I'll say it a millions times. This is not about safety. If the president was interested in safety he would get out of the Middle East because that is what provokes terrorism. Yet now I read from the New York Times that he is expanding his attacks in Yemen. Hat tip Drudge.

The NYTs reports:

The Obama administration has intensified the American covert war in [Yemen] exploiting a growing power vacuum in the country to strike at militant suspects with armed drones and fighter jets, according to American officials.

Covert war? What war? When was that declared? Has our dangerous, extremist, seditious, and subversive President who is usurping the Constitution just launch it himself?

It appears so. Is there not a man in the Democratic Party with the guts to put this maniac on notice for impeachment? No. Not a one. Why? Because no decent person could ever be a Democratic Party politician. And by virtue of being a politician in that party we can be sure no one will do the right thing.

Obama cannot justify his terrorism against innocent non-Muslim travelers unless he can prove, or pretend to prove, that Muslim terrorists are hopping mad at the USA and want to hurt her. So, it is on to the next Muslim country to provide the proof that strips away human rights (a thing the president hates when it applies to lots of white folks).

Muslims don't rate very high on the presidents list of concerns either. This perhaps has a taint of self-hatred (and there is surely much of himself to hate).

Even though Yemenis are not white, they don't seem to be brown enough to warrant his concern. If they were black, chances are he would not be attacking them. There are a few blacks in Yemen, but it is mainly a Semitic people.

Perfect for bombing by a half-blood "black" thug.

UPDATE: 6-9-11
Black appearing (mixed race?) Rapper, Lupe Fiasco, calls Obama a terrorist. Hilarious story at NBC Chicago online. Scroll down to the CBS News video towards the bottom before the public comments.

http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/politics/123467904.html

In this Wikipedia article it quotes Lupe (from the interview linked to) :

"My fight against [terrorism], to me, the biggest terrorist is [Obama] in the United States of America. I'm trying to fight the terrorism that's actually causing the other forms of terrorism. You know, the root cause of terrorism is the stuff the U.S. government allows to happen. The foreign policies that we have in place in different countries that inspire people to become terrorists."

Short and sweet. And true.

Watch out for this fellow. Muhammad is part of his real name, he was brought up in the Islamic faith, and his father belonged to the Black Panther Party.Wikipedia

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/travelnews/8559732/Cruise-passengers-tell-of-seven-hour-security-revenge-nightmare.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/09/world/middleeast/09intel.html?_r=1&hp

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lupe_Fiasco

Rand Paul's Heroic Efforts to Stop the Fascists

2011-06-04T11:37:00.000-07:00

June 4, 2011 A.D.

Rand Paul stood tall against the Patriot Act last week (Campaign For Liberty). C4L's Tim Shoemaker has a detailed account of the encounter with the fascists on the Senate floor.

Tim writes that "Before it was over, Campaign for Liberty's power and Senator Paul's determination to stand up for what he believes in were on display for all to see. "

God bless the Campaign for Liberty and Senator Paul.

If the criminal types who voted to renew the Patriot Act were serious about terrorism they would make sure no Muslim could enter the USA legally for a visit (except to stand trial for crimes) or become a US citizen. And this until hell freezes over. And they would have had our borders secure by now.

They would have already defunded the phony war on terror which, in itself, spawns more terrorism. Thus it is no wonder they keep the phony war going. This is actually state sponsored terrorism by the Federal government viz a viz the "war" on terror which the government uses as a jobs program for "law"enforcement types.

Nazi-style storm-trooper careers are in fact becoming a fast growth industry in America. This is not only at the federal level (they are leading the way), but at the local level too. And if you don't see that this is happening to us as quickly as you can say "totalitarian police-state" you are mentally retarded, stupid, or a recipient of the Nazi-like lifestyle.

Since the knuckle-dragging baboons in congress have done none of this, then we know they are not really interested in the security of the American people and the Patriot Act is just cover for their tyrannies. The Patriot Act is merely a convenient way for fascists to get their Nazi-style jollies targeted at LOYAL citizens and true patriots.

Watch out Mr. Paul, the Federal government thugs who are in charge of these programs and do the actual spying and arrests (and make a good living do it, cha-ching, cha-ching, cha-ching) especially don't like decent men such as yourself.

Which explains why they do what they do.

http://www.campaignforliberty.com/article.php?view=1453

TSA Official Molests Innocent Woman

2011-06-03T00:45:00.000-07:00

June 3, 2011 A.D.

Another innocent American is molested by TSA officials. Here is the story about another TSA incident at the Blaze.

Still no videos yet of minorities getting sexually molested at airports and not liking it. Ugg. Do they get off on it or what?

Oh, and, why are the perverts in the Obama Admin continuing to discriminate against homosexuals by not having homosexuals frisk people they are not sexually attracted to like heterosexuals are not allowed to frisk people they are attracted to? Or do the homosexuals get more rights than the heterosexuals? Or are all TSA friskers heterosexuals? Or, god forbid, all homosexuals? Sounds kinda confusing? It is. And that is because being a Democrat leads to all sorts of confusion because being a Democrat means you are a depraved and demented person.

OMYFREAKINGOSH! I would be mortified if I was a TSA worker who was suddenly forced to stick my hands in men's crotches for a living (me being a female heterosexual). Or do they let the decent folks opt out of the job? But why opt out if there isn't something amiss or exceedingly controversial OR ABSOLUTELY IMMORAL about being asked to touch peoples private parts against their will?

It's hard to figure out perverts.

So I guess it doesn't bother homosexuals and lesbians working in the frisk line at the airport. Looks like they don't mind at all! At least we haven't heard a peep from them. Or are there NO homosexual friskers? Or is it don't ask don't tell over at the TSA and they are shy about their sexuality and no one knows if they are there?

Does anyone believe they are shy about this matter? LOL

If there are homosexuals at the TSA it appears they enjoy frisking as a job perk. And to get an idea of how unseemly this would be, who doesn't think a high-school grad and heterosexual named Bubba that works for the TSA is NOT going to enjoy frisking a beautiful woman and touching her breasts? Are homosexuals just plain more virtuous than that? Come on, who believes that?

Thus if Obama isn't discriminating against homosexual screeners in the TSA then he would demand that homosexual men be allowed to frisk women and lesbian women frisk men since they are not attracted to them. Oh gosh. This is funny. They would have to have the "homosexual" line for homosexuals to line up in so the homosexual friskers would know who to avoid. Or TSA officials would have to wear a name-tag labeled: "Homosexual Frisker" for the flying public that didn't give a flying fig.

Moreover WHY are there no homosexuals passengers balking like heterosexual passengers are? Is it that the heterosexual passengers are more mentally unstable in their ability to cope with such things?

NOT LIKELY.

Yet we do not hear that homosexuals have opposed this frisking and, believe me, if they were opposed to it we would have already heard about it.

ENDLESSLY. Loudly. Obnoxiously.

Apparently they are NOT protesting about being touched in sexual places by those they are sexually attracted to and they ain't lettin' on about it!

No siree!

When you listen to corrupt people and treat them as if they were not, this is what you end up with: complete and utter moral confusion and chaos. Maybe homosexuals don't fly in commercial airplanes?

The homosexuals are silent about this real discrimination. I guess when it means a free grab for their fellow travelers, discrimination is grand.

If president Obama truly cared about security and safety he would get us out of the Middle East immediately because that is what provokes terrorism.

As you can see, he isn't out of it. It might provide too much sexual excitement.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/woman-screams-out-during-tsa-screening-alleges-molestation-demands-agents-arrest/

Stupid Kids Cheer Murder of Osama bin Laden

2011-05-03T10:25:00.000-07:00

May 3, 2011

As you will recall, Osama bin Laden was NOT wanted by the FBI for bombing the twin Towers in New York City. And you should also recall that the Iraqi War Resolution, which also justifies chasing down Osama, was NOT a declaration of war. It was a justification to use force on behalf of the United Nations.

Now, GOPers get orgasmic about the UN only when it allows them to murder foreigners overseas. And since the War Resolution was not a declaration of war we shouldn't have been using Navy seals to kill anyone. And since we did (allegedly) it means our president is as much a criminal as the Democrats say George Bush is.

But no matter, leftist scum and dumb kids are united! United behind a life-style of criminal thinking. Hitler wanted a united Germany too, but unity of evil doing is not a virtue.

Our founders despised unity with tyrants and broke the bands that bound them to despots. Our young people have joined themselves to the evil doers.

Of course, the giddy leftists cheering the death of Osama include pseudo-conservatives like radio talk-show host Hugh Hewitt.

I can only assume that the reason the government quickly disposed of the body (never to be found?) is because it ISN'T Osama's.

In other words, there is no evidence that Osama has been killed. I suspect he has been dead for a very long time. And now he has been properly buried in a phony funeral, the president might have a chance to get out of the Middle East. I wonder if the poor sap who we buried donned the classical mobster sea ment boots?

But don't worry (if you are a leftist). Our Bully-in-Chief is still going to recommend the sexual molestation of little white girls at airports while he continues to provoke more Muslim attacks on our soil by meddling in the affairs of Middle Easterners. I'll keep you posted as to when I see video of little black girls getting "pat downs" by the dangerous, extremist TSA thugs. Gosh, I wonder why Black people don't seem to be offended by the molestation their innocent daughters might face. I haven't heard of one black person opposed to it enough to film the outrage.

Does the TSA just go after innocent white girls?

UPDATE 5-4-11:

The government might release an easy to photo-shop picture of "Osama's"
dead body for gullible people to enjoy.

UPDATE 5-5-11:

The government will not release an easy to photo-shop picture of "Osama's" dead (alleged) body for gullible types to enjoy. It claims to be worried about blow-back. But if it was really serious out blow-back it would get out of the Middle East yesterday. So again, the Obama administration lies to us.

And much is being made by the government controlled media and the commie shills in it (like those at CNN) about the so-called conspiracy nuts who don't believe Osama has been killed. These Democratic Party boot lickers are wrong as usual. People like me don't believe that Osama was killed the other day because OBAMA (Osama with a "B") is a dirty-rotten scoundrel.

He lies that he is a Christian. He lied about taking government funding for his campaign (he opted out of it after he promised he would). And he lied about closing down GITMO. He lied about getting us out of Iraq. We are still not out of it as our military is still occupying it and shooting people.

And the government in general is run by crooks, liars, and dangerous subversives and extremists. And they are especially at the highest levels of government including the military and the CIA.

In other words you are nuts if you trust anything the government tells you EXCEPT that it is out to destroy loyal Americans and plunder the wealth of its citizens.

Democrats Look to Foreign Criminals to Bolster their Voter Base?

2011-04-29T15:27:00.000-07:00

April 29, 2011

I guess there are only so many criminals the Democrats can glean from among the US population to vote for them. Seems they have to look overseas for foreign born criminals living here in the US.

The Obama Department of [In]Justice has given citizenship to invaders with criminal records.

Here is the story at the Conservative News Service.

Naturally, these dirt-bags are eminently suited to become Democrats some day. With the Democrats' core values being theft and slaughter (confiscatory taxation and abortion) these new "citizens" are suited to becoming Democrats. I guess we are running out of criminal type Americans who buy into that evil mindset.

I suppose you could say that is the good news.

Edwin Nora writes:

Staff members of GAO's Homeland Security and Justice team who worked on the audit told CNSNews.com in an e-mail that the three individuals were naturalized as U.S. citizens under President Barack Obama.

Well of course they were.

I'm thinking they would be delighted to get a job with the TSA sexually molesting pretty American women and little white girls at US airports. And the Obama administration would likely be happy to see they got the jobs.

You have to be an imbecile to think Obama cares about American jobs and workers out of them.

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/3-persons-convicted-terrorism-related-ca

Retarded TSA Official Thinks A Beauty Queen is a Terrorist

2011-04-29T06:56:00.000-07:00

April 29, 2011 A.D.

The TSA bosses are the criminally-minded perverts who continue to subject innocent women to sexual abuse at US airports.

Here is the story at the Tenth Amendment Center online.

So why does the government let retards work at the TSA?

The answer should be obvious.

http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/04/27/former-miss-usa-left-in-tears-at-tsa-checkpoint/

Dumb Cops Almost Kill Judge

2011-04-27T06:00:00.000-07:00

April 27, 2011 A.D.

Some stupid cops almost killed a judge or a member of her family on Easter Sunday. Here is the story from NBC Miami. Hat tip Drudge.

One criminally-minded cop says to the terrified judge ‘Judge Holmes, you know, these guys may not know who you are."

Let me translate that for you. The criminally-minded cop was saying: you know these dangerous moronic cops are worse than criminals, so you need to be more careful in the future.

He was scolding her for defending her family with a gun from unknown prowlers attacking her sister's home (i.e. the cops).

This has gone too far and cops should be forbidden to "storm" a home when they have no idea who is inside it and have no evidence that there is anything amiss at the home. They have no right to terrorize people like this. It needs to be outlawed.

All these criminally-minded imbeciles should lose their jobs. They nearly murdered innocent people. If cops are too afraid to do their jobs without nearly murdering folks they should find other work.

They might try sewing petticoats in a lingerie factory for a living. It would also be therapeutic for these mental cases.

Why didn't these criminal types (i.e. the cops) just knock on the door and ask if everything was okay? That judge might have had every right to shoot the prowler cops in her yard waving a gun in the window. Cops might stop behaving like criminals if she did.

It is time for new laws to prevent cops from terrorizing the public like this. They need to learn some manners too.

Like how to knock on a door. It is a perfectly normal thing to do. And that is probably why cops don't know to do it. We should outlaw cops sneaking around peoples' yards like peeping Tom perverts.

http://www.nbcmiami.com/news/local/Broward-judge-ordered-by-deputies-come-out-with-your-hands-up-120755199.html?dr

Government Officials Continual To Sexually Molest Little Children

2011-04-15T02:38:00.001-07:00

April 15, 2011 A.D.

Not to be outdone by the perverts who sexually molest children without official authorization, the TSA continues to sexually molest them with President Obama's blessing. Hey, where is the video of Obama's girls getting their crotches poked by TSA officals? I'm sure Obama wouldn't mind if they were poke multiple times, over and over again, for security's sake!

This is what happens when you have a Muslimish president in power.

As you will remember (wait, no one in the mainstream media told you yet?), as you will remember, Mohammad had sex with a nine year old when he was in his mid fifties. And he utterly enjoyed it. Furthermore, billions of people have loved and adored him over the centuries knowing this fact. You didn't know the god of this universe at any time approved of old geezers having sex with little girls? Where have YOU been? The Muslims have known this for centuries.

Naturally, the US government, particularly the Democrats, are very excited about inviting a deranged bunch of religious nuts to our country who approve of sexually molesting children. Not only does such a religion inspire Democrats in general (Islam is very pro-slavery and so are Democrats), it also provides Democrats with the exciting prospect of making sure tiny-little, lily-white, non-Muslim girls are sexually molested in particular.

Democrats just couldn't be more delighted.(You Tube)

Notice how that most of the Obama sponsored TSA sexual assault videos we see in the news show the sexual assault of white people at our airports? Something very deviant appears to be on the move and could it be racist as well?

Any reasonable person knows that Obama hates white people (he even calls white people the "enemy"). Clearly, having innocent white folks sexually molested at our airports is a good way for Obama to bully them about. But you would think that, just to keep up a pretense of virtue, Obama wouldn't go out of his way to appear openly racist in choosing whites for sexual molestation at the airports. But this IS the dangerous extremist Barack Obama I am speaking about, and so anything is possible.

When you invite Muslims into your modern western country and you have a radical, leftist, Muslimish president who is very fond of them and even comes from a Muslim background, what you appear to get is sexual molestation on steroids. On steroids because it is egalitarian. The government women get to sexually molest the little girls too--it's not just for men!

Government officials molesting innocent little girls at airports while government officials continue to let in the religious group of people that insists sexual contact between adults and children is acceptable and virtuous appears to be no dumb mistake.

D.C. lets in the Muslims while it justifies assaulting us and robbing us of our liberties because it is letting in Muslims. All they have to do is stop letting in the terrorists (e.g. Muslims). But where is the fun in that for Obama and his government pals?

Stay vigilant. Support and promote anti-pervert nullification legislation in your state. Keep track of the fight against Obama's perverts here at the Tenth Amendment center website. There is a nice map of the developments. Much more work has to be done (and quickly) as the perverts have taken over the government. Sound the alarm.

Stop a pervert today: Nullify TSA regulations now!

http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/nullification/tsa/

America and the World Will be Better Off with Obama Out of Power

2011-03-29T06:50:00.000-07:00

March 29, 2011 A.D.

The president of the United States said in his speech last night that:

"Of course, there is no question that Libya, and the world, will be better off with Gaddafi out of power."

Well, duh, there is no question that America (and the world) will be better off with Obama out of power.

Obomber said:

"I, along with many other world leaders, have embraced that goal, and will actively pursue it through non-military means."

Dude! What's up with that military hardware, those bombs, and missiles you are employing over Libya? You nuts bro?

Obomber also said:

"The task that I assigned our forces--to protect the Libyan people from immediate danger, and to establish a no fly zone--carries with it a UN mandate and international support."

A UN mandate? Who freaking cares? Answer: Not any American dedicated to upholding the US Constitution and surely not any American who swore an oath to it. Let the international "support" bomb Libya if it means so much to them. We need our military home and we need to get out of the Middle East yesterday.

Obomber then said:

"We would likely have to put U.S. troops on the ground [if we didn't put a No Fly Zone in place], or risk killing many civilians from the air."

Dude! What ARE you smokin' ? You are creating a Gestapo with the Department of Homeland Security which absolutely risks killing many Americans from the ground in the future and surely does now terrorize them more than any Jihadist does and I should believe you care about the dangerous things any government will do to citizens ?

Obomber then said:

"To be blunt, we went down that road in Iraq [the road of putting boots on the ground]. Thanks to the extraordinary sacrifices of our troops and the determination of our diplomats, we are hopeful about Iraq's future. But regime change there took eight years, thousands of American and Iraqi lives, and nearly a trillion dollars. That is not something we can afford to repeat in Libya."

To be blunt, you are a stupid dude. Didn't you just say in this same speech that

"To brush aside America's responsibility as a leader and--more profoundly--our responsibilities to our fellow human beings under such circumstances would have been a betrayal of who we are." ?

I know who I am, but who the hell are you? Even Louis Farrakhan doesn't know. And since you don't even know who you are how the heck do you know who we are?

(You Tube) In the long version, a little before the 8 minute mark.

You CANNOT now brush aside putting troops on the ground if the no-fly zone doesn't work because you just said what is going on in Libya is "our" responsibility and that these Libyans are our "fellow human beings".

Obomber then says:

"I have made it clear that I will never hesitate to use our military swiftly, decisively, and unilaterally when necessary to defend our people, our homeland, our allies, and our core interests."

Okay, now you are really lying. You did hesitate. You waited three weeks or so and now you are acting multilaterally under the auspices of the UN (because you are a weenie). And if attacking Libya isn't a "core interest" then why are we using our military and bombing a sovereign state in the Middle East? For their core interests? If so, where does the Constitution give you that power?

And Obomber said:

"That is why we are going after al Qaeda wherever they seek a foothold.That is why we continue to fight in Afghanistan, even as we have ended our combat mission in Iraq and removed more than 100,000 troops from that country."

Crazy dude! You put this country at greater risk by attacking another Muslim nation! Al Qaeda came about in the first place because of USA presence in the Middle East. And by continuing this presence YOU assure the continued growth of Al Qaeda.

In other words you are helping Al Qaeda.

Presidential quotes taken from Politco
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0311/52093.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdI1l_0667M

Lawless Obama Attacks Libya

2011-03-28T16:46:00.001-07:00

March 28, 2011 A.D.

Barack Hussein Obama addresses the nation on television.

My response.

The president says we have the responsibility to protect citizens all over the world.
Where is it in the Constitution that we have the responsibility to protect non-Americans all over the planet from their despots?

I cannot find it my copy of the Constitution. Can you?

The president says we Americans are obligated to send our sons and daughters to their deaths (if need be) just because he says so.

Why is this?

It is because Obama is as much a despot and tyrant as the despot and tyrant that Obama wishes to depose in Libya, Muamar Gaddafi.

If the Democrats had any morals they would start impeachment proceedings against our Muslimish dictator-for-another-day President Barack Hussein Obama. So don't expect impeachment proceedings. Democrats have always been bloodthirsty war mongers and it appears they always will be. You need never doubt this.

The truth is that we are not obligated to support the aspirations of the Libyan people as our imbecilic president suggests. If Obama thinks so then he can go live there and fight for them. Oops. That would require guts. So that isn't going to happen either.

He is a coward. And so he will hide behind his military and pretend to be brave. His speech is one lie and deception after another. He lies that his authority comes from the UN.

Our dear leader spoke for a little over 25 minutes. He urged us to support the Libyans in their quest for freedom. But only a moron thinks the people in the streets of Libya are interested in freedom. They are Muslims. And Muslims are not interested in freedom. Only ex-Muslims could be interested in freedom. To say Muslims are interested in freedom is like saying Nazis were interested in the welfare of Jews. Such thinking is irrational and stupid.

Gestapo-Cops Assault Colonel Ann Wright and Terrorize Peaceniks

2011-03-21T19:32:00.000-07:00

March 21, 2011

The depraved monsters in the Darth Vader costumes (You Tube video) have gone too far. What sane person thinks Americans should be abused by sissy "cops" like this military drag? Be sure to watch the video and see these horrifying freaks as they cowardly crush an old woman.

From their "Vader" helmets I presume these members of the "evil empire" are the Virginia State Police. If you live in Virginia and you don't defund your Gestapo unit you will live to regret it. Correction: your grandchildren will live to regret it. Do you want your grandchildren abused by these Gestapo-Cops? Do you think they won't touch you and yours because you are law abiding folks? If you do you are a fool. Eventually the abuse will make its way to your door step one way or another because absolute power corrupts and thugs in the video are exercising it. And the newest growth industry in the US is the Gestapo and the Gestapo-Cops. To keep their jobs they are going to have to have more people (like you) to assault, abuse, and arrest.

Your family is next sooner or later.

Citizen of America please not turn your police forces into military units. You are stupid if you do. And mind you these people are just in it for the money. So they are not interested in justice like you are. In fact, anyone who dons an outfit like that to arrest a few peaceful protesters cannot remotely be interested in keeping the peace. They are interested in a pay check and a retirement package. And if they were told to mow down the protesters until they were dead, they would do it.

It's about money. Always follow it.

There is no reason nor any excuse for you to keep such dangerous depraved monsters in your state. Arm yourselves and protect your own families. You take responsibility for their safety because if you don't these criminal types in the state police will pose are more serious threat than any drug dealer or thief. At least after an encounter with a drug dealer you won't have a criminal record. After an encounter with the Gestapo Cops, they will render your life ruined by an arrest record or time in prison.

You are safer with the drug dealer.

If you want to have a state police force you must make them as harmless as kindergartner teachers. Take away their toys and all the space age gizmos that give them orgasms. Give them night sticks and pepper spray/gel instead.That will curb their Kim Jong IL tactics.

Oh dear, would they be afraid to be around the public with only night sticks? They should be. They NEED to be afraid of the public. Make them fear it. Thomas Jefferson said they should be afraid of us and not the other way around. If the sissies don't like working without toys to torture citizens then they better find work more suitable. Like working in the lingerie section of the nearest department store. They could sell frilly unscary things and wrap them in pretty boxes tied with pink bows.

The only people who should have been arrested at the Daniel Ellsberg protest outside of Quantico are the criminally-minded beasts who arrested the protesters and crushed Colonel Wright.

Only imbeciles couldn't arrest a handful of peaceful protesters without hurting and terrorizing them.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LWdu_vaeI7c

Who Lets the Terrorists Into the Country?

2011-03-11T18:08:00.001-08:00

March 11, 2011 A.D.

Who is letting the terrorists into the country?

The perverts in the US government let them in.

And they do it to overthrow the Constitution and justify their new jobs program: the totalitarian police-state. If the perverts in the Obama administration wanted to protect us from terrorists they would stop letting Muslims into the country.

Info Wars is reporting that the perverts in the Obama administration are ramping-up the sexual torture of innocent Americans at the airports.They can strip search you without a warrant and without a reason.

Read about it here.

http://www.infowars.com/justice-department-tsa-has-authority-to-literally-strip-search-people/

New Hampshire and the TSA Perverts

2011-03-01T15:17:00.001-08:00

March 1, 2011 A.D.

The Live Free or Die state, New Hampshire, is putting forth a challenge to the TSA sexual molesters our airports. Let's hope they follow through with this legislation and start serving warrants on TSA officials. WMUR out of Manchester has the story here.

Nullify now! Nullify today! Nullify usurpation!

"The bill (HB628-FN) "makes the touching or viewing with a technological device of a person’s breasts or genitals by a government security agent without probable cause a sexual assault," according to the introductory text of the bill." WMUR

May this small spark start a wildfire of legislation across the nation to stop the perverts in the Obama administration from their assaults. Our president lectures Middle East despots about the right of people to rise up against evil, while he continues to force sexual assault on Americans. And he demonizes those who resist this tyranny.

The president is a criminally-minded evil doer who, if he could, would be as evil as the leaders Muslims rise up against. This is because he is a committed Marxist and has sympathy for a religion whose founder was a military leader (Mohammad) who approved of, practiced, and promoted sexual slavery and a life of crime.

http://www.wmur.com/r/27035604/detail.html

Cat and Mouse: USA and Terrorists

2011-02-24T18:09:00.000-08:00

February 24, 2011 A.D.

They let them in. They chase them around. They strip us of our rights. They frighten women and children and molest them at airports. Then they let them in. They chase them around. They strip us of our rights. They frighten women and children and molest them at airports. Then they let them in...

Who is letting the terrorists into the country?

Answer: the United States Congress

Who is chasing them around?

Answer: the US government.

Who is frightening women and children and molesting them at airports?

Answer: the Department of Homeland Security and the Transportation and Security Administration.

Why?

Jobs, jobs, and more jobs for the neo-Stazis in government (the DHS and the TSA).

How?

Scaring men, women, and children into welcoming a totalitarian police state by letting in terrorists to terrorize women and children.

"FBI Arrests Suspected Bomb Plotter". Read about it here at the Wall Street Journal blog.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703408604576164342532246126.html?mod=WSJ_hp_MIDDLENexttoWhatsNewsThird

US Government Officials Outraged Over Middle East Bloodshed

2011-02-21T14:43:00.000-08:00

February 21, 2011 A.D.

You are not supposed to openly mow down your own people in the streets as it is now happening in Libya. No, no. Instead you (government officials) are supposed to have a Stazi organization like the Department of Homeland Security to terrorize your citizens into submission, fear, and subjugation. Politico has this report about Libya. Mrs. Clinton wants the Libyan government to stop attacking citizens.

She would probably prefer that Libya officials demonize anyone who opposes government abuse of power and call them national security threats. At least, that is how the tin-horn, third-world, banana-republic thugs in the Obama administration do it .

But open bloodshed? Good grief, Democrats disapprove. There are other ways to destroy liberty freedom and lives. Just threaten to throw people in jail or ruin their lives and reputations through costly court cases and false accusations that destroy long before the charges prove false. You don't have to mow folks down these days and embarrass your fellow despots.

It's like how the other day Mahmoud Ahmadinejad signaled to Obama that Obama isn't able to "control" his feelings or emotions (The Blaze). Apparently, despots are supposed to be more discrete when they destroy the lives of others and Obama needs to be more like Ahmadinejad.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/laurarozen/0211/Libyan_envoy_denounces_Qaddafi_accusing_him_of_genocide.html

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/ahmadinejad-insults-obama-cant-even-spell-his-own-name/

President Obama Union Gang Leader

2011-02-17T19:47:00.000-08:00

February 17, 2011 A.D.

President Obama tells critics of the rancorous union protesters in Wisconsin, that the union protesters are our "neighbors". (USA Today)

Obama said everyone has to recognize "fiscal realities," but public employees are "neighbors" like teachers, firefighters, social workers and police officers. "I think it's important not to vilify them or to suggest that somehow all these budget problems are due to public employees," he said. USA Today online

Where was such compassion when he was telling Hispanics to view their political opponents (your neighbors and mine) as enemies?

Or when Barney Frank threatened to reveal the addresses of AIG employees? And for what purpose was that? To murder them? Or only to terrorize them?

What thuggish reason was behind the threat by congressman Frank?

And what thuggish threat was behind the president when he "vilified" Americans opposed to illegal immigration?

Obama cares only for the criminally-minded thugs like himself who wish to plunder the public, but become extremely dangerous and threatening if you try to stop them.

http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2011/02/obama-argues-with-gop-governor-over-unions/1

TSA To Perform Surgery Before Boarding Planes?

2010-12-06T15:56:00.000-08:00

December 6, 2010 A.D.

You might not only get sexually molested on Janet Napolitano's say so these days. Next on the agenda could be mandatory surgery to board a US airplane. Hat tip Drudge (NY Daily News Online.)

"Jihadis bent on concocting a "new kind of terrorism" are brainstorming how to surgically implant explosives to make undetectable Frankenbombers." James Gordon Meek

Heck, they could even sexually molest you during surgery, just to make sure you are safe, of course.

I would say I'm joking, but who would have believed the US government turned fascist and started sexually assaulting its own innocent citizens in 2010 America?

I suppose only a pervert and imbecile who refuses to ban foreign Muslims from entry into the USA.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/2010/12/06/2010-12-06_al_qaeda_is_truly_gutless_terror_doc_eyes_sewing_bombs_in_thugs.html

TSA Perverts And Their Colleagues Overseas

2010-11-28T08:07:00.000-08:00

November 28, 2010 A.D.

Government sexual humiliation is a precursor to mass murder. It always is. It always will be.

From the Gulag Archipelago by Alexander Soltzenitzen

"'Sit down.' 'On yours knees! ' Strip!' In these statutory orders of the convoy [transportation officials] lay the basic power one could not argue with. After all, a naked person loses his self-assurance. He cannot straighten up proudly and speak as an equal to people who are still clothed. A search begins...Naked prisoners approach, carrying their possessions and the clothes they've taken off. A mass of armed soldiers surrounds them...

...The convoy [government transportation officials] does everything with intentional brusqueness, rudely, sharply, not speaking one word in an ordinary human voice. After all, the purpose is to terrify and dishearten. Suitcases are shaken apart, and things fall all over the floor and are then stacked up in separate piles...
(pages 569 and 570)

From The Hiding Place by Corrie Ten Boom:

"It was the third night as we were getting ready to lie down again under the sky when the order came to report to the processing center for new arrivals [traveling to a prison camp]. A ten-minute march brought us to the building. We inched along a corridor into a huge reception room. And there under the ceiling lights we saw a dismal sight. As each woman reached a desk where some officers sat she had to lay her blanket, pillowcase, and whatever else she carried onto a growing pile of these things. A few desks further along she had to strip off every scrap of clothes, throw them onto a second pile and walk naked past the scrutiny of a dozen S. S. men into the shower room. " (page 191 Bantam Books, paperback 1971)

They dressed in prison garb (Ravensbruck concentration camp). Then:

"We stood alone in the room where a few minutes later we would return stripped even of the clothes on our backs." (ibid., page 192)

"As we trooped back out through the shower room door, the S.S. men ran their hand over every prisoner, front, back, and sides. The woman ahead of me was searched three times." (ibid., page 193)

Regularly:

"Fridays--the recurrent humiliation of medical inspection. The hospital corridor in which we waited was unheated, and a fall chill had settled into the walls. Still we were forbidden even to wrap ourselves in our own arms, but had to maintain our erect, hands-at-sides position as we filed slowly past a phalanx of grinning guards.

Corrie then remembers a passage from the Bible:

"He [Jesus Christ] hung naked on the cross." (ibid page 196)

Murderers never mind sexually humiliating the innocent.

Some time later:

"Several days later my entire work crew war ordered to the hospital for medical inspections [for their welfare, no doubt]. I dropped my dress onto the pile just inside the door and joined the file of naked women. Ahead of us, to my surprise, a doctor was using a stethoscope with all the deliberateness of a real examination."

"'What is this for?' I whispered to the woman ahead of me."

"Transportation inspection," she hissed back, not moving her head." (ibid, page 210)

Transportation inspection indeed.

The US government is speeding us towards disaster.

Do the Perverts (the TSA) Discriminate Against Homosexual Workers?

2010-11-24T13:18:00.001-08:00

Why is the TSA demanding same sex sexual molestation during the enhanced interrogation technique groping option at our airports?

Isn't that discriminatory to TSA homosexuals?

Why, in the first place, are TSA men not squeezing women's breasts and TSA women not touching men's testicles during the grope-down? Is the man on man groping and woman on woman groping a suggestion by the perverts at the TSA that to do otherwise might be improper? Then how can it be proper for homosexual men to grope heterosexual men and homosexual women to grope heterosexual women? Or do I have this mixed up and should those sentences read "how can it proper for homosexual men to grope homosexual men and homosexual women to grope homosexual women"? Or is it that homosexual men and women don't mind being groped by strangers who are homosexuals? Or should homosexuals need to request a heterosexual groper? Or is the TSA keeping the homosexuals out of groping duty altogether?

And wouldn't that be discrimination against homosexuals?

I wonder if the perverts at the DHS and TSA thought about all this?

The point is that if it is improper for men to grope women and women men (because they are mostly sexually attracted to each other), then it should be improper for homosexual men to grope (heterosexual) men and homosexual women to grope (heterosexual) women. Or at least it should be improper for homosexual men to grope homosexual men and so forth. If not, then I want to see what happens when a homosexual man gropes a heterosexual female. Especially after she slugs the jerk.

Are we to wear little name-tag type thingies indicating what sexual group we belong to so we can get sexually assaulted by the right sexually-oriented TSA pervert?

Let's see the perverts and sexual molesters at the Department of Homeland Security get out of this one.

And why have the homosexuals in the TSA been so quite about this?

Is it because of the wind-fall and mother-of-all government approved homosexual exploitation of heterosexuals? After all, they don't know who is or is not a homosexual. Is it even possible that there might be a homosexual who is offended by being groped by a member of his or her sex who is a homosexual as well? Time will tell, but the homosexuals have been eerily quite about this.

Homosexuals at the TSA must be laughing their asses off about this.

More accurately, someone elses ass.

Leftist Women Depend on Molestation For Sexual Satisfaction?

2010-11-22T14:40:00.000-08:00

Well of course they do.

What other choice do they have? Few decent men (or for leftists, also women) would want them otherwise. No doubt, this natural perversion. especially among Democrat women. explains why Janet Napolitano thought the sexual assault of innocent American women (AND CHILDREN) was a benign measure. She actually is so morally corrupt, she doesn't know any better.

And now we have another sicko leftist women (Whoopie Goldberg did it over the weekend) openly admit they enjoyed or approved, in some strange way, sexual assault by strangers. Gloria Allred basically says she enjoyed TSA groping. She said so here (Real Clear Politics).

Clearly she considered the TSA groping to be sexual in nature. And yet the government pretends it isn't. But Gloria confirms (via her enjoyment or pleasure from it) that it is indeed sexual. And that is because it is. And that is WHY Janet Napolitano's promotion of it is so vile and perverted.

Normal and decent people knew instantly the TSA was sexually assaulting people. Since leftist women are so vile and disgusting themselves and may think they have to be assaulted in order to have any pleasure, they were caught off guard in having thought sexual molestation was the norm. It's like with people who eat dogs for dinner. It is normal to them but everyone else is disgusted.

Normal people do also really understand why sex between Democrats resembles the barnyard activities of rutting pigs. There is nothing civilized about ~~perverts~~ Democrats and this goes for sexual matters.

Naturally, this explains why leftists are so fond of abortion. Wouldn't you be fond of it if you had sex with a leftist man or woman?

Of course you would, because you understand that it is a vile and loathsome encounter. Leftists, essentially, cannot even stand each other. This is why leftist women make sure they can snuff out the innocent little life created by the pig they just had sex with and why leftist men make sure the pigs they just had sex can do it legally. Just in case. The last thing about 48 million of them ever wants is offspring that may remotely resemble the pigs they just had sex with. And if they do keep their offspring, they make sure that snuffing out the little human lives is always an option for the future. Just in case.

Of course, it's the evil right winger who thinks those little lives deserve a chance to live even knowing that their parents are more foul and stupid than rutting pigs in heat.

Why couldn't they just keep their perversions to themselves and stop making it all into social policy and "security" measures? Who understands the truly wicked people?

Only God.

We know the Obama administration is lying about all this. Not about leftists being worse than rutting pigs, but about being concerned for our safety.

If they wanted to stop these attacks, they would remove our military from the Middle East and stop attacking Muslims in their lands. Failure to do this is causing the attacks on Americans. Since Obama is not removing the military, we know he is not serious about our security. Therefore these sexual assaults and strip searches are merely the actions of madmen (and their disgusting creepy women). I must say here that any right-winger who supports the molestation and porno-screening is just as evil as those on the left who promote it.

If the administration was really concerned about this threat it would go after Muslims (profiling them by religion, not race). It is a MUSLIM threat only. And certainly no foreign Muslim would be allowed into the country for any reason (except for trial). This is IF the government was really concerned. Domestically, if anyone is to be subject to this treatment it is Muslims or Middle Easterners. They would be the ones subject to Israeli type behavior profiling. But that is not happening so we know the government is lying and not really concerned about safety.

Since government is not banning foreign Muslims from entry by plane, it is certain that the government really doesn't care about our safety. And if the government was really responding to each problem as it presents itself (the latest assault by government is supposedly a result of the Underpants Bomber) it would be responding to MUSLIMS and not to Christians, Atheists, Buddhists, or anyone else.

Of course, I don't believe the government should be involved in domestic airline security in the first place. Let the airlines decide who should fly on their planes and let these private companies ban Muslims if they continue to threaten the safety of the flying public. The airline owners have the right of freedom of association. And if they don't want to associate with Muslims they shouldn't be forced to do so. Or if they do wish to associate with them, then other customers can choose to not fly with that company and ride with another. The airline companies have more to lose than the government does from terrorist activities, let them handle their security.

Mass sexual assault by government is a prelude to mass murder. It always is.

It is a characteristic of all modern despotic regimes; and now our own.

Further reading:

Here is a beautifully written and indeed prophetic article written by Garrison Keiller in 2006. At the end he wonders why conservatives are asleep at the wheel of the ship of liberty. I wonder the opposite. It was the liberals who were once for freedom (free love, free drugs, free rock and roll). They are the ones asleep at the wheel and leading the way further down the road to tyranny. The only defense of liberty today is coming from the right, which is just starting to wake up, and from the Libertarians who are leading the way.

http://phonysecurity.com/keilloropinion.htm

UPDATE: November 23, 2010

The Daily Mail online may have uncovered what goes on in the sociopathic minds of the government workers who sexually assault innocent Americans at airports for money. Anyone who would follow these orders is mentally disturbed in the first place and we may be getting to the bottom of it in this article.

If these comments are true, it would seem that the sociopaths have already dehumanized vulnerable travelers they discriminate against and we are not even months into the sexual assaults. If true, TSA workers are dehumanizing fat people. But that is odd, as so many of them appear to be fat themselves. So I guess it's the skinny TSA officials who might be the real dangerous ones.

Quotes from the article:

"'It is not comfortable to come to work knowing full well that my hands will be feeling another man's private parts, their butt, their inner thigh,' one told the BoardingArea blog."

"'Even worse is having to try and feel inside the flab rolls of obese passengers and we seem to get a lot of obese passengers!'"

"Another said he had a huge problem dealing with a 'large number of passengers...daily that have a problem understanding what personal hygieneFur [sic] is.'"

These sorts of comments prove my point that sexual molestation by government officials is a precursor to mass murder by government. If you are so disgusted with the people you have to "handle" each day you have no hesitation in the future to assist in murdering them someday if requested to do so. You will send them to the proverbial boxcars for detention. You detest them already. You have already, in your heart and mind, made them subhuman. You will just be following orders. You need your job and you are too stupid to find honest work which is available to you elsewhere, so you must follow orders because you are more important than the people you help murder. You will be fully prepared to do this because of your past participation in the early stages of crimes against humanity as you abandoned your own human dignity when you sexually molested others against their will.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1332307/Now-abused-TSA-staff-vent-anger-security-patdown-searches.html

Whoopie Goldberg SupportsTSA Molestation?

2010-11-22T00:17:00.000-08:00

It sure does sound like it.

Basically, according to Whoopie, if you find something you like to squeeze on someone's body, and you work for the TSA, just squeeze it.

So says Whoopie Goldberg (more or less) on Mike Huckabee's show at Fox News this week. Oh, she moderated her comment by pointing out that the government perverts (my terms) will have a new policy when dealing with children (no squeezing their junk). Imagine a world where squeezing kids' junk isn't considered deviant and you got the US government in 2010.

Huckabee then called anonymous blogging "word terrorism". It seems Whoopie doesn't approve of anonymous publishing either and she wrote about it in the new book she was promoting. Fascist police-state control freaks never like anonymous publishing. How else can they destroy the lives of people they don't like who criticize them?

Basically, for the Whoops, police-state molestation is OKAY as long as her sorry self is safe.

Yeah, the rest of us aren't afraid to die. We are just idiots going about our lives hoping to get blown up and Whoopie is so much more smarter than us who don't want to get sexually molested along the way. That has to be what's going on. We who are opposed to the sexual molestation and police-state thuggery are simply too stupid to be afraid. And when it comes down to the deranged thinking by some, nasty words are worse than sexual molesting people.

Whoopie also defended or justified her recent televised tantrum of Bill O'Reilly (she walked off the set where he was a guest) because Bill didn't say flattering things about Muslims.

Whoopie has Muslim friends, you see.

And they have children too. And its not nice to hurt them. Whoopie cares, you see. She is such a good person. Ms. Let-the-perverts-squeeze-your-junk is so moral. Let them squeeze Muslim junk too, I suppose. That's moral as well in her eyes. No wonder her name is whoopie. And what Bill said offended her because of her friends and their children (or grandchildren).

But if Whoopie had done her own fact-checking on Islam (she condemned anonymous bloggers for not fact-checking) maybe she would know that Mohammad (the founder of Islam) had sex with a nine year old when he was in his mid-fifties. And maybe she would know that everything Mohammad did was good and virtuous (according the the Koran) and to be revered and emulated (except for the number of wives a man may have). Everything Mohammad did back then this is still good to do today, including having sex with children (child brides).

This is what Whoopie is defending?

If non-anonymity means you are as bad a fact-checker as Whoopie, it would seem better to be anonymous and not let people know so quickly how stupid you are. What fact checks has she done on totalitarianism, Marxism, the TSA, and Obama?

Has she fact-checked Obama's Marxist agenda? It was long ago (long before blacks got so involved in politics in America) that the Noble Prize winning economics professor Friedrich Hayek wrote that Marxism was a form of slavery. The reason it is important to note that blacks weren't involved in politics when Hayek wrote this is because blacks and Democrats want to blame racism by white Republicans for their opposition to Obama's Marxist policies. But Hayek had people like Obama pegged a long time ago. Hayek called Obama's Marxism: serfdom. He even wrote a book about it (The Road To Serfdom).

Chances are Whoopie votes Democrat and that means she supports the Marxist (slavery) agenda. Marxism is slavery (eventually you run out of other peoples money) and all you are left with is the brutal rules that prevent you from making more money on your own without government approval.

Like Greece today.

I assume the Whoopster opposes slavery. Yet, she supports Obama and his Marxist scheme. I assume she opposes slavery but Islam never does and yet she defends Muslims. Slavery, in Islam, is current and is still on the books. Especially sexual slavery. Muslims are big on sexual slavery. Why does Whoopie condemn slavery in America? Just because whites did it? She needs to fact-check that as it was Muslims and Arabs helped run that trade operation out of Africa. They still run them.

No, what Whoopie is approving of is a mythical Islam, one that doesn't exist. And she is approving of it because she hasn't fact-checked who Mohammad was as every Muslim believes he was.

By the time this mental midget did get her facts right many of us would be dead or imprisoned like the Jews in the concentration camps. Much of what the Gestapo did was legal, just like the TSA sexual assault Whoops promotes. Just because the TSA says it is policy, doesn't make it moral. Just like with the Nazis. They did what they did according to the law.

Whoops has either NOT checked her facts on Mohammad or she approves of 54 year old men having sex with a 9 year olds and isn't willing to stand up publicly and say so. I don't know which. But with her support of sexual assault by government officials, it's looking more like she already knows Mohammad believed in having sex with kids AND trading women for sex.

It is ironic that Whoopie is worried about people criticizing a religion (whose founder had sex with a child and is still loved and adored today) when she is afraid of hurting the feelings of children who belong to that religion.

Speaking of stupid people who would be better off saying and doing things anonymously so they wouldn't embarrass themselves publicly, what kind of freaks watch Mike Huckabee so much that his show is popular enough to remain in the Fox line-up?

He is an imbecile.

Obama Administration Continues To Lie About TSA Sexual Assaults

2010-11-20T15:00:00.000-08:00

The perverts in the Obama administration continue to defend some supposed right of the government to sexually molest travelers.

And the reason for the sexual assaults?

Safety.

It is a outright lie.

IF safety was the main goal we would be doing that which would stop the attacks by Muslims: get our military out of the Middle East (which Obama refuses to do), and keep foreign Muslims off airplanes.

Let the airlines solve this problem. Then let the people choose who they wish to fly with.

Anyone who supports the sexual assault of innocent travelers as authorized by the US government is a pervert.

What is really amazing is that those who promote the TSA sexual assault policy act like those who oppose it want to get blown up in a jet. Not only are they a bunch of perverts, but they are just plain stupid.

Marxist Jay Rockefeller And His Pet Bug

2010-11-17T20:46:00.000-08:00

Jay Rockefeller has a "little bug". It's location is unknown, but it might be rotting his brain.

He said this:

There’s a little bug inside of me which wants to get the F.C.C. to say to Fox and to MSNBC, ‘Out. Off. End. Goodbye.’ It would be a big favor to political discourse; to our ability to do our work here in Congress; and to the American people, to be able to talk with each other and have some faith in their government and, more importantly, in their future. (NY Times blog Mediadecoder)

Rockefeller says that he wishes Fox News and MSNBC would go away AND at the same time wishes that we folks out here would have more faith in government.

How is it he doesn't see we could NEVER have faith in a government that would consider getting rid of Fox News or MSNBC? If the feds got rid of them it would be incontrovertible proof that we could never trust the government or him.

He is either dumb as dirt or evil to the core.

Or it's that darn bug.

Fly swatters anyone?

http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/11/17/senator-cant-fox-and-msnbc-just-go-away/

P.S.
I wonder what senator said we should abolish ABC, CBS, or NBC during the years when I was growing up and Detroit was in flames with riots, Kent State students were gunned down, and hippies were marching throughout the country, sitting in, or dropping out.

That was a time of profound disturbance and social upheaval with a whole lot of very rude comments, student bombings, and rebellion. We've not seen anything remotely resembling that chaos here in our day. By Jay Jay's account you'd think Fox News is breeding what Walter Cronkite bred: anarchy. The polite nightly news back then was as placid and polite as a Harvard grad sipping Brandy after a night at the opera.

And it was because the nightly news wasn't representing all viewpoints that blood was running in our streets. Especially because of the murderous Democrats (the party of Jay Rockefeller) and their criminal murderous rampage in Vietnam.

It must be infuriating for a evil man like Rockefeller, whose family appears to assume for itself power to run the world, to be required to share power with the American people as our founders and framers had intended. Rockefeller and his fellow Ivy League elites have run this country for the past one hundred years without a free press and they have become accustomed to exercising power without the check and balance coming from the people. And that has to be why we, and the whole world, are on the verge of chaos.

We don't like the Marxist makeover Jay Rockefeller and the Democrats wish to create. And the Marxists deserve to be exposed and the light of truth shined on their diabolical schemes. If Rockefeller doesn't like the criticism he can stop behaving like a criminal. If he was doing right he would have nothing to fear.

Let the people speak Mr. Rockefeller. You are not God is neither is your stupid bug.

Pravda Is Reporting

2010-11-15T09:42:00.001-08:00

That "America conducts subversive activities in friendly territories" (Pravda Online).

Naturally I understood that to mean the friendly nation being subverted and spied upon was my country, America.

Of course, the Russians meant countries overseas like Finland. Now, I don't trust the Russians anymore than I trust the White House, but I would have to sympathize with the Fins because I'm opposed to the abuse my government delivers to whomever they don't like.

And I'm not necessarily opposed to spying in foreign countries as I'm sure the Russians are not. The problem with my government is that they don't know why they are spying. They don't even know what evil is. This is proved by the fact they don't believe they are as evil or worse than the people they spy on (for the US government approves of the sexual assault of innocent women in children at US airports, for example.)

These Russians had it right when I was growing up: America was decadent. It still is. And that is why she is faltering. Our most corrupt people are people in government. They go by the name of lawyers, judges, and cops. They are the biggest criminal class we have which gets away with murder and mayhem, theft and sexual assault.

But I don't think the Russians are so much better culturally these days than they used to be before 1989.

So, they have their decadent problems as well.

http://english.pravda.ru/world/europe/13-11-2010/115767-america_scandinavian_countries-0/

No, It's Not the Universal Signal That Government is About To Sexuallly Assault You at the Airport

2010-11-14T21:06:00.000-08:00

It's a photo (at the Drudge Report ) of Janet Napolitano giving the thumbs up sign.

I doubt the photo will stay at Drudge much longer. It seems that Google doesn't have the photo available to the public either or I'd provide a more permanent link to it. Perhaps the government already knows that the thumbs up photo LOOKS like a signal to sexually assault people and hasn't made it available for the public domain.

So you might have to imagine Janet's ugly face with her hand near it giving us the thumbs up. It might as well be her middle finger.

And if you will be traveling this holiday season, just remember that the thumbs up sign isn't really the eff-you sign from deranged government officials signaling an impending sexual assault of an innocent traveler at a US airport.

Though it probably should be.

http://drudgereport.com/

Pedophile Book Flap At Amazon Online

2010-11-11T13:51:00.000-08:00

Amazon is embroiled in a flap over a book they are or were selling about how to molest children without getting caught.(LA Times )

Well heck, isnt' that what you can do by joining up with the Department of Homeland Security and the TSA, asking for airport duty at the "opt out" area? You're a pervert or deviant if you do so, but apparently it's completely legal.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/jacketcopy/2010/11/amazon-removes-pedophiles-guide-remains-mum.html

Happy Groping and Merry Molesting To You American Bitches: The TSA Would Rape You For Christmas If They Thought it Would Keep You Safe

2010-11-08T02:58:00.000-08:00

The voices are getting louder. Even the communist scum at the New York Times are talking (via Yahoo News).

It seems the perverts and deviants at the TSA cannot keep molesting women and children if they don't have provable threats to air travel. Or so they think.

And if Americans keep resisting being assaulted and sexually molested or strip-searched each time a new deviant policy is put into effect, the US government might need to invent scary events when a real one hasn't materialized at the "proper" time to provide support and justification for the sexual assaults.

(Perhaps some rapists and molesters don't like it when you struggle? Maybe it makes them nervous).

The perverts and deviants are just doing their jobs and just following orders. And if they needed to finger rape you, they would. Oh wait, they now have the machine so they don't have to rape you. Yippie skippy! It's your lucky day!

You can now relax, stop bending over, and pull up your panties you low-life American bitches who deserve to be raped and assaulted anyway!

But know this, bitches, those machines might not always work BITCHES (sound of vinyl gloves snapping on wrist) !

And so it appears the US government has had to quickly manufacture a few threats to air travel to terrorize Americans (especially women) into accepting being sexually molested at airports this coming holiday season.

Happy Thanksgiving you turkeys!

And it seems in order to cut off the growing complaints and to address the too few examples of terrorist threats: we get the sudden flurry (occurring back to back) of non-threatening threats.

First there was the phony printer cartridge package (with goofy wires coming from it) in the cargo hold of a plane coming from a country only a moron and a criminal would be allowing packages to come from. Naturally, this moron and criminal is probably a government official who earns a paycheck BECAUSE terrorism is a growth industry in America and thus NEEDS there to be more terrorism (or the pretend threat of it) in order to keep their jobs. And naturally it's a moron or criminal in the White House (the TSA is an executive branch department).

Then there was the trickster who had a mask covering his whole head when he flew in to the country. He wants asylum. Let's just agree right now that the US government knew the guy already wanted asylum and helped him do it (the mask must have been very good and very sophisticated) AND hoped to terrorize the public in order to help the TSA justify its growing policies of sexual assaults and molestation.

Figure the trickster to be a CIA asset who was coming over anyway and was the tool to kill two birds with one stone. The other stone is stripping American bitches and their wicked little children of their liberty and dignity because government "men" are afraid to fly on airplanes.

Remember folks, some things are worse than death. And being raped or molested by a perverted and deviant government official (something that usually happens in corrupt places like South America or North Korea) is dang near one of them.

These government perverts and deviants are a bunch of sissies and cowards who are afraid to die and that is why they behave this way. (They probably vomit when they hear the phrase "Live Free or Die"). They don't care about the American people. That is not what this is about: they just care about themselves and their pathetic existence which the whole of humanity suffers for.

We see what this is really about when we hear of reports about how the TSA perverts yell out loudly (to humiliate and intimidate) that a passenger is opting out of the porno strip-search device. No doubt this is POLICY straight from the Gestapo's main office in Washington D.C.

Are we to believe these morons don't have radios to communicate with each other and so they have to screech like chimpanzees looking for a date because a sane individual doesn't want to get strip-searched?

The TSA intentionally humiliates the resisting traveler in this manner in order to punish them and make their lives more miserable and then has the gall to charge the molested or assaulted traveler for it. It is quite a criminal operation. And you can be sure this additional humiliation is official policy.

The molesters in charge of this whole operation are bunch of war-mongers too because if government really wanted to stop terrorism all it would have to do is GET OUR MILITARY OUT OF THE MIDDLE EAST. It is now well known that the presence of our military in the Middle East is provoking attacks. And since the government already knows that we create the terrorism by our presence in the ME, I can assume nothing else but that the government wants the terrorism (as an economic plan and means to establish a totalitarian police state.

There is money in terrorism and the US government is prospering from it. What they want to do is assault American women, humiliate them, accustom them to depravity, and strip the bitches of their dignity so government goons can collect their pay and have us by our gonads, literally.

I'm afraid to say that it appears that the terrorists have more respect for women than the TSA officials and the leadership in US government. I understand that most American women who are Muslim captives are NEVER sexually molested and assaulted.

Leave that to US government officials.

The behavior of the US government is more like that of the Gestapo. Only I've never heard that the Gestapo allowed other government officials to molest and assault their own women or the women in their families. But our fellow Americans, in name only, are so depraved that they willingly accept knowing their own women and children will be molested and they want it that way.

This is sick.

So why don't these Gestapo types just stop flying airplanes if they are so frightened and leave the rest of us brave women to face the dangers ourselves with our dignity left in tact?

Well, I guess Gestapo types are always sissies and cowards. That's why. And it is profitable too (don't forget that part). Terrorism for profit and fun, American style! Government approved, straight from the White House!

And I guess it is because these people don't think about dignity, or liberty, or high moral principles. Their behavior (assault, molesting) indicates they have no morals. Perhaps they have been stripped of their humanity somewhere along the way and it too no longer functions. It is likely they never had it (bad seed). And so it follows that the next step these depraved perverts are willing to take, because they have already proven they are willing to molest on command, is to murder people on command in order to allegedly prevent murder.

This is the same kind of deranged mentality possessed by the woman who drowned her beautiful children in the bathtub because the world was such a wicked place and she wanted her children a guaranteed passage to heaven. This is our guaranteed passage. She murdered her own children when they were young and innocent in order (according to her) to prevent them from ever becoming guilty of sin and going to hell. This is how our deranged leaders think. They will terrorize us to prevent us from being terrorized.

All of this is insanity.

Yes, this is how deranged people always are. And this is the characteristic mind-set of the totalitarian mind obsessed and paranoid. Whether it is the Kim Jon Il, Joseph Stalin, Adolf Hitler, George Bush, John McCain, or Barack Hussein Obama: the totalitarian mind is fully deranged and capable of the worst collective conduct known to mankind. Remember: government (not religion) last century was the most dangerous entity known to mankind in the history of the world.

It is government which is the greatest evil known to mankind.

And so it appears to a race to the bottom by our leaders. And yet it is Bush, McCain, and Obama say they trust in God. Janet Napolitano says she does too.

But they lie. They all lie. They could never behave like they do and really trust God. It is impossible. God does not ask them to sexually molest others.

So, are you ready to celebrate Veterans Day this year? We can all get teary-eyed about how veterans fought for the liberty of these Gestapo-styled Americans at the TSA and their puppet masters to molest and assault American bitches in the name of justice and freedom. I'm sorry. I used the NAZI reference again. But I don't think the Nazis sexually molested their own women and children. They sexually molested the people they didn't like. And it is strange, but it appears they had a more of a shred of decency than the TSA and the US government.

We are in deep trouble folks because sexual humiliation is a key characteristic of mass murdering governments.

Tell me this, will Obama's children be sexually molested or strip-searched by TSA officials like we will be, when they are grown and leave the White House and pass through airports on their travels? And will the women in Nancy Pelosi's family now be stripped-searched or molested by TSA officials, like we will be, when they are traveling this holiday season?

Or will they get a pass?

After seeing photos of Janet Napolitano, I assume that sexual assault and molestation at airports by TSA officials, just following orders, might be the only way she can get sexual favors. Now, I know she wouldn't demonstrate getting stripped-searched recently when she christened one of her new porno machines at a big city airport a week or so ago.

But, maybe she was just being shy that time.

Come on Janet, let go!

We want to see video of you being man-handled by a TSA official wearing a big smile or a vicious scowl, just like you want it for us. We want to see them grab your breasts and your crotch just like you want it for us. And we want clear video of it (not blurred or from a distance) so we know how to behave and so we know that what is good for us is good for you. We want to see your face when it happens and we want to watch the video over and over again before our flights. We want to see them touch your breasts and grab your lady thing like they will do to us. Do you really have a lady thing? If there is any doubt, you can have them scan it.

We want to see you get what American bitches deserve from your official TSA policy! It's the least you can do for us.

After all, we bitches are just endearing buddies. Like Joy Behar says.(Media-ite)

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Opt-Out-of-a-Body-Scan-Then-nytimes-3016411705.html?x=0

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/joy-behar-apologizes-for-calling-sharron-angle-bitch-says-its-a-term-of-endearment/

Victory For The First Amendment And Terrorism Is The Best Jobs Program In America

2010-10-26T04:28:00.001-07:00

The federal government has had a set-back in its dangerous drive to subjugate the American people and trample the Constitution through the apparatus of its brutal police-state. And if it were not for the brave folks on the front lines defending our freedom, we would all be less safe.

Carlos Miller is one of those brave people. He is the operator of the Photography is Not A Crime blog (which doesn't seem to exist anymore). And he also runs the Pixiq website. (Picks-it? Picks-eek?)

The site is designed for photography buffs, professionals, and anyone curious about such things. Miller also follows stories about legal issues and threats by government officials involving constitutional issues of freedom of the press in regard to filming and photography. He is also one of those brave folks who has been harassed for photographing things megalomaniacs (e.g. government officials) do not want photographed in public.

Of course the government doesn't mind photographing, recording, or observing us in everything we say, type, or do, and acts like they would die if they couldn't. What a bunch of sissies.

So they spy on us like they are paranoid lunatics. This impression probably explains more about them than we really wish to know. Perhaps if they weren't so evil themselves they wouldn't have to constantly look over their shoulders in fear of their fellow citizens.

Who can understand the deranged?

Carlos has had run-ins himself with the law and courts regarding the issue of photographing that which we see while walking around in our public lives. But just like the totalitarian communist governments of old, our government now wishes to tell us what we can and cannot document with cameras in public. Carlos is on the front lines battling this communist thuggery by our government officials.

Here is a good interview with Carlos at Anti-War blog online.

There is now a posting at his website about the defeat of the fascists at the Department of Homeland Security by the forces of liberty and freedom dedicated to upholding the Constitution. This is a very important defeat and men like Carlos are heroes for taking a courageous stand against these powerful forces of evil who invent devious and unjust laws and regulations to falsely arrest citizens just to ruin their lives for the fun of it. These victims are anyone who isn't in government or a member of the government officials' families.

You can read about the DHS defeat here .

And despite it, the DHS continues to display a persistent and hypocritical consistency in its abuse of citizens. We see it with their desire to limit what we do with our cameras while they continue to have us under constant surveillance where ever and when ever possible. And we see it in Janet Napolitano's unwillingness to expose her private intimate sexual organs to TSA officials with the same strip-search scanners she expects everyone else to be subjected to if they don't wish to be sexually molested by her goons in the TSA.

Under the leadership of this dangerous and subversive communist extremist, we see a consistent hypocrisy across the board for abusing citizens rights by expanding the reach of government into every aspect of our lives (the very definition of totalitarianism).

I do not contend that the citizens ought to have the same authority as government officials. I do not contend that there is no role for government. I contend that officials have no authority whatsoever to abuse citizens, whether consistently or not. And I contend that the Federal government as it now stands is the enemy of the American people. And as it stands it is currently in breech of its agreement with the American people as outlined in the US Constitution. If government officials are offended by being called the enemy of the American people I suggest they examine their conduct, not mine. As their conduct, and not my imagination, is the source of my charge.

Buck up fellas and get some decency and integrity. You will feel better about yourselves and won't be so paranoid and mentally disturbed.

Furthermore, I am of the opinion that no person interested in liberty advocates the continued operation of the Department of Homeland Security. There is no purpose for it. If we have a terrorist problem there should be a terrorist division in the FBI and that's it. Expand it when necessary and reduce the size when the threat has subsided. But to create what is basically a standing civilian army, slash gestapo, slash nationally controlled militarized police-force with one of the largest budgets in the federal government covering nearly two dozen other departments that will be a permanent feature to fight the temporary problem of terrorism is in fact the greatest fraud perpetuated on the American people in my lifetime. If the problem is terrorism, and indeed terrorism is a temporary problem caused by government itself, then there wouldn't need to be a department as large and as permanent as the DHS.

In other words, government is lying about the reason for its existence because our current security problems are only temporary (and are caused by government itself through immigration policy and its stirring-up-the-hornets-nest meddling in the Middle East).

The DHS is structured to NOT ever end and so it makes a lie of the idea that this is about protecting us from terrorism. We already have FEMA for natural disasters, and we have our state powers. We don't need the goons and thugs at DHS for this. The DHS is only for controlling everything we do in our lives for the rest of our lives by surveillance, intimidation, assault, sexual molestation, humiliation, and threats of arrest to ruin our lives and make us pariahs.

That is criminal behavior on their part.

Americans will secure their own ~~homeland~~ country. That is why we have guns. That is why we have the national guard. That we why we have the militia powers. By the way, I prefer the word "country" as opposed to the Hitlerian term of "Fatherland", or the Muslim terrorist term "Homeland".

And anyone who advocates the continuance of the DHS poses a greater threat to Americans than a terrorist. The proof of this comes from what we learned last century. And what we learned then was that government officials (not isolated kooks) are the most dangerous persons in the history of the world. They murdered, tortured, raped, assaulted, robbed, and subjugated more people last century than any religion or its extremist kooks ever has throughout the history of mankind. You can read about that here.

The most dangerous persons in the history of the world (governments) became dangerous when they started to act like the Department Of Homeland Security now acts.

Terrorists are in our country, for the most part, because government officials let them into the country in the first place through immigration. It turns out that this happens to benefit government officials by providing them with secure jobs, careers, and excellent incomes for chasing the terrorists around the country. Terrorism has thus become an important government-sponsored economic enterprise wherein government supplies itself with a permanent stream of income by providing the country a permanent stream of immigrant groups more prone to commit terrorist and criminal acts.

The downside for decent sane people (besides the split blood and treasure) is the liberty-robbing police-state thuggery this government industry produces.

The security state has now taken on a life of its own. It's hungry and thirsty for work. And it thrives when it is insured a steady stream of criminal characters who really do threaten our lives and thereby guarantee the paychecks of the enforcers. It is quite a gig.

And it works like this.

Government intentionally lets in a dangerous immigrant group known to spawn terrorists (like Muslims) or Hispanic groups (who are known to have a high crime rate). Members of these groups tend to attack citizens and participate in crime more than members of other good immigrant groups which the government makes sure it doesn't specialize in. This brings calls (mainly by government) for more federal government security forces. It also brings us more militarized local police who are generally unionized and realize that their bread is buttered when the supply of criminal types in greatly increased by government.

The federal government continues to let in more members of these bad immigrant groups whose current members continue to pose real threats which government has successfully intercepted time and time again (or so they say). If the supply (as in supply and demand) of violent prone immigrant groups is not kept at a sufficient level, security forces will lose their jobs. So the further importation of dangerous immigrant groups must continue and indeed expand (amnesty will help) in order to supply security forces with jobs.

Terrorism is the federal governments' best newest jobs program. Importing a high crime immigrant group through amnesty is the next best jobs program for law enforcement government types.

Yes, it's a risky game because government officials have to terrify themselves at little with the criminal types they invite into the country. So the trick for government types and their families staying safe is for the government to keep one step ahead of the criminals (I realize it is confusing as to which criminals I refer to).

Government thus needs to keep ahead of the imported criminals in order for the terrorist jobs program to be successful. Success of the program is achieved when the "good" guys stay safe while they import unsafe immigrants. To stay safe (and keep their terrorist job program running smoothly) regular citizens have to be robbed of liberty. Robbed by surveillance. Robbed of control over their own lives. Robbed by invasion of privacy. And even robbed of dignity with sexual molestation and strip searches of innocent women and children at transportation hubs.

Congress is in charge of the whole operation.

If government really wanted to stop terrorism (ha, ha, ha, and ha) it would simply stop letting Muslims into the country like we stopped letting Nazis come here. And it would get out of the Middle East. Our presence there provokes American Muslims (which is why we need to keep new ones out). All Muslim immigration should be banned. And if the government wanted to reduce the crime rate it would focus on immigrant groups who have a lower crime rate AFTER they arrive here. This would disqualify Hispanic immigration for the foreseeable future. If government were serious about reducing crime it would discourage amnesty (just pay the cheating criminally-minded invaders off, that is the main reason they are here anyway. Then send them packing).

But government refuses to take these steps so we know it doesn't want a reduction in crime and terrorism (at least not enough to disrupt the terrorist and crime jobs program).

For those of us who love this country, fixing this problem may be impossible. But it will surely be impossible if the freedom of the press is compromised (which upsets the likes of Janet Napolitano and Barack Hussein Obama). I mean the freedom part upsets them.

Though I believe that filming and photographing outside public buildings must be allowed in order for freedom to survive, I don't agree with all the first amendment opinions Miller's website promotes. I believe they, like others, make a common mistake about who the first amendment is written for. The first amendment is not for state legislators.

The first amendment is directed specifically to the FEDERAL congress and what the federal congress specifically may not do. They are never permitted to infringe on the rights listed therein. Never means never. But we know, from Thomas Jefferson and others, that the states and local governments can infringe.

This difference between the power of the states and the power of the federal government explains why the District of Columbia is not a state. If D.C. was a state it could legally limit speech or the press among the people who live in the capital city. The founders clearly opposed that as evidenced by the first amendment's limit on the federal congress.

Jefferson believed that local governing bodies would have the right to address speech issues, like slander, for example. Is that not an infringement according to the purest understand of free speech? Of course it is. But it is a power given to the states only. The federal congress must stand mute and still. It has no authority to intervene because the first amendment doesn't allow it. The only thing a federal court has authority to do is ensure the federal congress is not interfering.

Same goes for the press.

The feds have no authority to touch it, only the states. The press must be as free as possible, but there must be some limit on what it can do. And that limit should be to protect the private sphere. And those protections must come though the states only.

Individuals cannot be safe from government abuse if they are not free to document, via cameras, the activities of the growing security forces which surround us at every turn. States would do well to ensure that private citizens are free to document any public interactions with security forces at any level. And if security folks don't like it, they should find other work (preferably honest work).

Our framers and founders already knew through personal experience that absolute power was despotic and needed to be prevented from being established. They didn't believe a general government could rightly exercise certain powers, but they also did not believe in chaos or anarchy. If our dearest and most important freedoms (speech, press, religion, etc) were to be at all restricted, it could never be the federal congress which could do it. To do so could even warrant secession, which is the example our founders provide to us through the Declaration of Independence.

Pure liberty, completely unrestrained, is tyranny and the founders knew this. It has to have a minimum boundary line and that line is the rights of others. But the founders never believed the federal congress ought to have the power to decide the nature of those boundaries in certain limited cases as specified by the amendments. And in fact, not even the states or locals can take away the right to bear arms, even though this is daily being encroached upon. The founders took it upon themselves to set some of these boundaries beforehand at the insistence of the anti-federalists. But it was the state powers that delineated the right to bear arms, not federal government (because it did not exist until AFTER the Constitution was ratified).

The founders wanted a tamper-proof Constitution as much as was humanly possible and they wanted the people to be able to throw off tyrants (like the founders did). Oh, are you a government official worried about being thrown off? Does it upset you? Yes? Well then : STOP BEING A TYRANT and you can better sleep at night. You'll feel better about yourself too as you will have regained your self-respect.

This throwing off of tyranny is a God given right to throw off any government which has breached its contract with its own people or violates what our creator has intended for mankind. This was Jefferson's point in the Declaration of Independence and this is the reason why he mentioned our Creator (and why Barack Hussein Obama excluded the Creator from his inept and stupid renditions of the Declaration).

Our president knows what the Communists know: Christians, or people who believe in God, don't believe corrupt men are the ultimate law givers. This infuriates tyrants like Obama. It infuriated Mao. And Stalin and all other sociopaths who think they have the right to run other peoples' lives OR ELSE!

All of this hearkens back to the Magna Charta and the rights we have which predate government. It reaches to Lex Rex and Vindiciae Contra Tyrannos. Both documents were very familiar to the founding generation who gobbled up every concept useful to steady their courage. These documents provided the moral (and Christian) justification for resisting and throwing off tyrants and you can be utterly confident that the leftist controlled government schools have made sure to not expose American students to that portion of our American heritage.

And for most of our history, our resistance to despots was taught even from the text of the Old Testament where God expected evil leaders to be deposed and punished.

Hey, if you are such a tyrant, don't worry, I don't want you punished. I'm nice. I just want you to go away and find some honest work and try to redeem yourself for the sins you are committing against your fellow countrymen and women. Okay?

Peace.

Our founders and framers took much comfort in the examples of good and bad governments in the Old Testament. And that was fairly true for most of our history. That is until the evil Democrats took up with the godless Communists and started insulting God. They now have Him exiled.

One reason King James produced his magnificent King James Bible in 1611 was because the Geneva Bible of the Puritans rightly taught that tyrants are not to be tolerated and ought to be resisted. King James wasn't too comfortable with that so he commissioned another Bible that would be more "King friendly". But it was this Geneva Bible that was carried overseas to America by our Pilgrim forefathers and mothers. They loved it. And because of them the earliest American Protestants were schooled on it.

The anti-tyrannical government Geneva Bible was the Bible of the Puritans as well as the Bible of Shakespeare. He would teach the English world (indeed the whole world) that tyrannical Kings and governments were an evil to be checked or resisted.

The Geneva Bible had notes in it referring to the Biblical teachings on godly and righteous resisting of tyranny and actions which the oppressed could take as authorized by scripture. It had this focus on resistance to tyrants because of the severe and bloody persecutions of non-Catholics by Catholic government officials in Europe. And that teaching came to us, with our forefathers, across the ocean, to this, my greatly beloved land, my country--America.

This is also why communists, in particular, hate Christians. They know that Christians do not see mankind as the ultimate authority about what is right or wrong. They see God as being the final authority for what is right and wrong, and this greatly disturbs the despots who believe (even if they don't admit it) that they are the gods of this life who must not be crossed.

Despots like Democrats subscribe to the same line of thinking. Obama is the best example of it in a president during my lifetime.

Janet Napolitano would know this if she read her bible and knew her protestant history. And she would know it better if she read the Geneva Bible. Clearly, she is ignorant of scripture or wouldn't be doing what she does. Should she be complicit in mass murder (may God forbid), like Mao was, she will not get away with it in the next life when she faces God. I pray she has no part in mass murder. Ever.

She should humble herself, repent for the despotism she has already committed, and find some honest work suitable for a person who claims the name of Jesus Christ. (People like her really do give Christ a very bad name).

Local governments and states could and should make some (few and limited) laws against photographers and videographers. This is why I believe that local laws against pornography are constitutional. Some evidence of that truth still exists throughout the country. Our system was designed to leave the local people and states free to make these decisions and then let the people see how it works or doesn't work among the various states. This is the beauty of federalism. It allows for greater freedom AND greater happiness among a greater number of citizens.

The issue I address here is not the travesty of porn, but who has the authority to address it by law. The feds have none because it is forbidden by the first amendment prohibition. The states only posses this power.

Our system was designed to allow for some more free states and some lesser free states according to the people of those states as they see fit unless they violate the Constitution (like the right to bear arms). Not even the states can do that as it is not reserved to them either since it was discussed specifically in the Bill of Rights as something we all possess. It is a right that belongs to the people themselves individually to regulate.

How profound it is that, in the light of the mass murder by governments last century, that it only occurred in countries where citizens were disarmed by their governments. I am awestruck when I reflect on the wisdom of our founders and what terror they spared us by forbidding the government to take our guns.

Federalism is so that each state can prove to themselves and others the efficacy or failure of their laws over time without subjecting the whole population of all the states to the errors in judgment by a central authority. That error could possibly never be repaired. In this federalist way the people learn how good law perpetuates liberty and thus their happiness.

The people can not discern what is good or bad law for themselves or their communities if the federal government exercises powers it ought not to have by nature. When it does exercise powers it ought not have, the people are less able to escape the widespread tyranny when these laws are bad. With the law powers decentralized, there is more hope that law will not become a broad-based weapon against the people.

The DHS asks for and acquires more and more absolute power. Intelligent people know that absolute power kills. And furthermore, intelligent people know it murders.

It appears Janet Napolitano missed that lesson at school.

Janet Napolitano is, by the living judgment of recent history, a person who is willing to request the kind of power that leads to mass murder.

I'm not saying that she is a mass murderer.

I am saying she holds the same beliefs about the acquisition of power which have, in the very recent past, proved to LEAD to mass murder, genocide, and subsequent subjugation. The only thing preventing it thus far (according to the historical record) is the fact that Americans are still armed. Also, no major disaster has provided the opportunity (the pretext) for government to murder citizens enmass with or without their lawfully held arms. This needed disaster (natural or man-made) was a prerequisite for the mass murders last century.

Mass murder happened in the past only when civilians were unarmed or unequally armed against government. And to which political party does Ms. Napolitiano belong? Any that stand behind the right of law abiding citizens to bear arms: the Republicans, the Libertarians, or the Constitution parties? Or does she belong to the party that does everything in its power to take away citizens guns: the Democratic Party?

Of course, this is easy to guess. Napolitano belongs to the party that works year round to take guns from law-abiding citizens: Democrats.

Her demands for more and more absolute power keep piling up. These demands confirm more than deny that she shares the same ideas of mass murderers last century who also coveted absolute power.

She has the same mindset. My wish is that she would recognize it and reject it. She would have to renounce the DHS to do it.

The mindset and actions at the DHS under the Obama administration are the exact kinds of essential steps taken before mass murder of citizens by government (democide) begins. These are also presteps for genocide (which the US government is activity committing through immigration as we speak).

Alan Whitehorn, writing at the Peace Magazine online, writes about the stages of genocide (including mass murder) GOVERNMENT takes before they commit the unthinkable. He states that these steps are not unobservable, unknowable, or mysterious; they can be seen ahead of time. I've never heard of this before, but when I read his article, it seemed to state some real truths (although some of things I disagree with).

The eight stages which prepare a government to commit mass murder and or genocide, as determined by Gregory Stanton, are these:

Classification
Symbolization
Dehumanization
Organization
Polarization
Preparation an Increased Inequality
Extermination
Denial

This theory is fascinating (and terrifying) in the light of current events in the United States. Here is how I apply the theory to our present problems.

Classification refers to an "us versus them" system. In our case the Democrats in government pit the rich against everyone else. They are ruthless about it. They have governed their party this way for over a half century. This is not a harmless thing as the rich are targeted to be plundered and now even threatened with attack like when Barney Frank threatened AIG employees. The rich are now automatically deemed evil by Obama and members of his party (even though rich Democrats are given a pass, for now, they are just whistling in the dark). The government, under the Democrats, have indicted, tried, and convicted all rich people ahead of time without trail and found them all guilty and worthy of derision and plunder.

Stage one of eight steps leading up to genocide or mass murder is now complete in America.

Symbolization is the act of applying a label to the hated group that plays off of the hated groups' characteristics, features, or even clothing. This is very well established with the Tea Bagger slur used by Democrats leaders or officials. They know it is actually a vicious vulgar sexual comment. Democrat leaders and workers use the vulgar term here and here (American Thinker). The appropriate term, by-the-way, is Tea Party or Tea Partier.

Stage two of the eight stages leading up to genocide or mass murder is now complete in America.

Dehumization is where, and I quote directly from Whitehorn's article:

"Labels such as “enemy” are hurled...".
Just this week, our president called his political opponents his enemies who deserve to be punished. He said this to a specific racial and ethnic group AGAINST another specific racial and ethnic group. This smacks of genocide. According to the president Republicans (who are a party made up of mostly whites) deserve to sit in the back of a car (like the back of a bus where blacks once were forced to sit?). He wasn't joking about the enemy thing. He talks as if he is a private citizen who doesn't have the power to wield the sword (kill) within his hands. He is either an idiot or he is mentally or emotionally prepped to kill Americans he opposes.

And it doesn't get much worse than he should use a vile symbol of discrimination against blacks to describe what he wishes for his political opponents who represent tens of millions of citizens who never discriminated against anyone.

Stage three of the eight stages leading up to genocide or mass murder is now complete in America.

Organization is about the methods government uses to physically attack its own citizens. It especially focuses on non-military enforcers, like militias or vigilantes (community organizers who terrorize, say a banker and his child, by rioting outside his home). In our case it will be our militarized police forces in lock-step with the DHS and the IRS. The IRS (or powers like it) are crucial to this stage since part of the suppression and genocide is denying citizens access to their money and property. The government has vastly increased the size of the IRS department. So this part of the theory is developing as I write. The expansion of the IRS is the only way Democrats can achieve their Marxist redistribution and plunder. Here is Congressman Ron Paul talking about growth of the IRS thugs and Obamacare.

The media must also be manipulated at this stage. Though the government has manipulated the media since the middle of the last century, the new media hasn't escaped. Think Huffington Post (where the president has written articles and suggested Americans frequent the website). And think of the attacks on opposition media FROM the White House. Think of the direct attacks on Fox News by the Obama administration. Think about the attack by the left on Juan Williams, formerly of NPR (partially funded by the government). Think about pleas for government to save the mostly leftist old media. Read about that here
and here.

The government has now just recently seized the power to pull the plug on the internet at will. I assure you it isn't for our edification or protection. This is an essential stage in the lead-up to genocide or mass murder because it helps insure that victims cries for help are silenced as much as possible.

Stage four of the eight stages leading up to genocide or mass murder is now complete in America.

Polarization and Inequality is the stage we are currently at. All aspects of this stage are being implemented by government as I write. Here are the features of this stage:

"The victim group’s rights are stripped away [Democrats do not want the rich have the final say about the disposition of their property. Native born Americans are being stripped of their rights by being replaced (eventually outvoted) by excessive numbers of immigrants uninterested in the preservation of our republic and the Constitution which protects those rights. These same immigrants are being bribed by Democrats once they arrive with the money plundered by the remnant of the rich native born Americans of European descent]..."

"[T] he political right to collective self-rule, the social right to collective autonomy, and even the right to exist are denied ..."
Old people, who are at this time in history, mostly white people, need to (if the Democrats are to be successful) die as quickly as possible since they are too expensive and they vote too much. So government is now trying to take away their small stipends and excellent medical care at a time in their lives when they cannot work like the young healthy, non-white able-bodied citizens who are flooding the government health care system for handouts. It appears that these young healthy people will have their health care handouts partly funded by the "savings" taken from the reduction in entitlements promised to elderly whites years ago who paid into the system for decades. THIS IS UNDERWAY AT THIS TIME.

Victims are "forbidden to enter the military".
What is happening here is that patriotic victims dedicated to our traditional values and customs will be ejected from the military and their careers ruined if they oppose open homosexuality and radical leftist ideology coming down from on high. This will create a military insufficient for self-defense (unless recruits are sufficiently brainwashed into believing 2 plus 2 is 10).

"The despotic regime denies the minority group’s right to self-defence [sic] or to own weapons."
The Democrats are working fast and furious on this. And we know from recent history, no one but criminals and the government will have guns. But I repeat myself.

The government denies " the uniqueness and importance of the minority group’s language..."
In our case, the government denies the uniqueness and importance of the majority group language which is the historical language of this whole civilization and now takes a back set position with immigrant groups who disunite the country by their failure to learn English. The majority in America is soon to become a minority because of genocide through immigration. And their language is quickly becoming a victim of it too.

"Other forms of discrimination may also occur: extra taxes may be imposed, along with prohibition from high status jobs and the confiscation of personal property. This is a quick way to acquire wealth and satiate the envy of a rival group."
Need I comment any further on that?

America hasn't been this polarized in my lifetime since the Vietnam era.

Step five of the eight steps leading up to genocide or mass murder is now well underway in America.

Preparation is the sixth stage where victims must be quickly identified and subdued. The government is tracking us every minute of every day. It is reading our electronic mails and gathering all our personal information including our biological data. It has now invaded the doctors' examination rooms and has stripped us of our dignity and privacy while it has gathered our most intimate information.

At this stage there must be some kind of identifying symbol that targets victims for murder. This is coming down to being a member of the white race: it's the identifying feature.

Even gathering together accidentally while white is a cause for condemnation and accusations of evil intent and racism. Just showing up white is now an evil act. This is an easily identifiable trait could target whites for swift extermination (as opposed to the slow extermination of whites through immigration and burdensome taxation that hands wealth over to non-whites and weakens the ability of whites to care for their own families).

We have not reached the point where government is directly murdering people because they are white unless you count bumping off the elderly (who are now mostly white) by denying them social security and good health care.

Extermination: Has not yet happened, this is the seventh stage.
Denial: Has not yet happened, this is the eight stage.

Whitehorn and Stanton's conclusion is that genocide isn't an accident and we can know ahead of time that will occur through these eight stages.

The DHS is thus a crucial player in securing the ability of the government to quickly stamp out resistance to genocide and mass murder. Especially if we lose the ability to use our guns.

http://antiwar.com/radio/2010/08/12/carlos-miller/

http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/20TH.HTM

http://www.pixiq.com/article/feds-agree-to-settlement

http://www.hbu.edu/images/hbu/publications/bia_newsletter/vol-02_issue1_10-04bia.pdf

http://www.peacemagazine.org/archive/v26n3p16.htm

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2010/01/chuck_schumer_calls_brown_a_te.html

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2010/10/government_unions_gone_wild.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fhDxxdYwksU&p=9E89961D5A9B0FFA&playnext=1&index=15

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE52N67F20090324

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=37773

Big Sis Strips Americans Of 4th Amendment Rights With Pornographic Machines

2010-10-24T17:43:00.001-07:00

Janet Napolitano and the Obama Administration heralded their Abu Ghraib torture tactics this week in a ceremony celebrating their new scanner stripping machine at JFK airport. She excused herself from the virtual strip search while her jack-boot thugs force it on others. The NY Daily News is reporting the story (though just about everyone else ISN'T).

What next? Pyramids of virtually stripped Americans Abu Ghraib style?

What is to be made of this horrible turn of events in American history?

Let's look to the past for understanding.

We know from basic history, that a key feature of some of the most evil people known to mankind, like slave owners in the south, for example, was to humiliate others by forcing them to strip naked. There are fewer more effective methods of dehumanizing others than by stripping them naked by force.

We read from the Peace Magazine blog:

"Ritualized humiliation takes place to further dehumanize the victims prior to death. Often this achieved by stripping the young women, mothers, and even grandmothers naked.

The author of the article, Alan Whitehorn, says that genocide has common features and that we can recognize them. One feature is called "extreme victimization". And it is within that feature (or category) that we find the discussion of nudity as a form of torture.

Corrie Ten Boom also spoke about how Nazi's abused people by stripping them naked. In her book--The Hiding Place--she tells how she and her family were imprisoned by the Nazis and forced to strip in front of strangers. The whole world knows about this deviant and perverted conduct by the Nazis from the ubiquitous photos of naked prisoners that remain before our eyes to this very day.

I'm not saying Obama and Napolitano are Nazis.. What I am saying is that forced stripping by government IS always a means to subjugate others and is usually always used by the most abusive governments known to mankind. And what Whitehead is talking about is a form of corruption known to be used by governments.

Susan Sontag writes about governments stripping people to humiliate and torture them during war. You can read about that here at the Southern Cross Review. She says that, according to the Geneva Conventions, torture includes forced nudity:

"And all covenants on torture specify that it includes treatment intended to humiliate the victim, like leaving prisoners naked in cells and corridors."

We are not left naked in corridors (yet), but we are MADE naked against our will when we have done nothing to warrant it. We are completely innocent and yet must suffer this wicked abuse at the hands of our government officials in airport facilities we built with our own tax dollars. Part of the terror of terrorism is the helplessness we feel in face of being forced against our will to fly where we have not chosen, suffer under threats and intimidation, and die in a manner we may not like including being blown to bits or lying half-naked in the streets after a bomb-blast. The helplessness of it all adds to the sense of terror, including having our dead bodies exposed to the camera and the glare of public.

Well what is not helpless about the subjugation and humiliation the government is forcing on us now when we travel by plane? How is it much different than what the terrorist has in mind for controlling us? Neither group has an ounce of respect for our opinions about what they wish to do with us. Both make us beg for mercy.

Sontag directs our attention to the portion of the Conventions which prohibits torture:

''No exceptional circumstances whatsoever, whether a state of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or any other public emergency, may be invoked as a justification of torture."

She establishes that forced nudity can be a form of torture and is not permitted because the US is a signatory to the Conventions. Yet, here, we see our own government now treats us worse than how it can treat war prisoners by virtue of the fact that we have done nothing wrong to warrant the strip search or alternative molestation in the first place.

Sontag hints at the deviancy and perversion of enforcers who strip people naked when she writes:

In '''Photographing the Holocaust,' by Janina Struk. If there is something comparable to what these pictures show it would be some of the photographs of black victims of lynching taken between the 1880's and 1930's, which show Americans grinning beneath the naked mutilated body of a black man or woman hanging behind them from a tree..."

Again, not to be extreme, we are not being mutilated, lynched, or thrown into concentration camps (yet). But the point is that anyone with a brain in their head knows that forced nudity is a form of humiliation and that people intentionally strip others against their will BECAUSE they know it degrades the individual. And if people do it specifically to degrade others, it is because everyone knows it is a form of humiliation. Most people resist it because they know they are being degraded. That is the reason there is such an uproar about it. The smart people in DC haven't seemed to figure this out.

Is this sort of depravity something that is learned at Harvard and various other Ivy League schools? Where did these people learn to, so easily, shed their humanity?

Only the lowest kind of person forces such a thing on the innocent. They have no conscience. Nor are they able to distinguish between right and wrong. They are the classic jack-boot thugs seen throughout history who crush the innocent underfoot in the pursuit of "following orders".

Sontag deepens our understanding about the sexual depravity and cruelty in these low types:

"Rape and pain inflicted on the genitals are among the most common forms of torture. Not just in Nazi concentration camps and in Abu Ghraib when it was run by Saddam Hussein. Americans, too, have done and do them when they are told, or made to feel, that those over whom they have absolute power deserve to be humiliated, tormented."

Early reporting by victims at airports seem to confirm her conclusions.

Many reports about the official response by TSA workers to citizens' resistance of the strip searches at the airports smacks of these sado-masochist type overtones. What Sontag describes as the absolute "absolute power" of government officials seems to describe what is being reported on the internet about TSA officials who intentionally make citizens feel that they "deserve to be humiliated, tormented..." for their resistance.

Sadly, many Americans are no longer willing to traveling by plane because of their fear of torture and humiliation by TSA officials. I have a feeling that the Democrats want this. They want to destroy the airline industry because of environmentalism and this is their ticket. They want high-speed rail (with body scanners too, no doubt). Democrats want a train system like Europe. This could be how they do it (if they get away with it). But the scanners would be for the trains too. That would mean most decent people won't go on those either. So the trains will be mostly for Democrats (but paid for by everyone) who don't give a flip if they expose their own children or themselves to the perverts in the transportation system. This is because Democrats are degenerates.

No person with a shred of decency wants to go through these scanners because they know forced nudity is an intentional form of degradation. In truth, many Americans are more willing to fly without the scanners than with the,. And you know what that means. It means that most Americans would rather die than to be stripped by a government pervert or pawed by a deviant TSA official getting his jollies.

That's really bad. Really bad.

These violent and dangerous extremists in the Obama administration, having little intellect in comparison to our great founders and framers, could learn much from them if they tried.

James Madison said the following about a man ( University of Chicago).

He (or she):

"...has a property very dear to him in the safety and liberty of his person.

He has an equal property in the free use of his faculties and free choice of the objects on which to employ them.

In a word, as a man is said to have a right to his property, he may be equally said to have a property in his rights."

In other words, our bodies are our property and according to the Constitution we have the right to be secure in our persons, property, and effects. This is our natural and unalienable right which the evil doers in the DHS, TSA, and the White House do now violate in a most reprehensible and fascistic manner.

For women, it is violation nigh unto rape.

The only positive thing about this is that Napolitano refused to pass through the scanner. This might indicate, that even though she is a ruthless thug, she still does possess a small amount decency.

But it is certainly not enough to save the rest of us from her recommendations for government sponsored strip-torture or optional molestation.

http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/2010/10/22/2010-10-22_body_scanners_unveiled_at_jfk_airport_homeland_security_sect_janet_napolitano_do.html#ixzz13ByMuAJL

http://www.peacemagazine.org/archive/v26n3p16.htm

http://www.southerncrossreview.org/35/sontag.htm

http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/v1ch16s23.html

Obama's Fear and Frustration

2010-10-19T17:05:00.001-07:00

The president of the United States allows perverts to leer at us in electronic strip-search machines at airports and it is we the citizens who are gripped by fear and frustration?(Politico)

Is this fellow nuts?

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1010/43706.html

Corrections and revisions to blog posts occur frequently. Thank you for your patience.

Thomas Woods PhD: Our Hero

2010-10-11T03:44:00.000-07:00

President Obama won't take it kindly that loyal Americans wish to throw off the chains of slavery he wishes to clamp tighter around their wrists. And he won't like it that Thomas Woods wants to teach them how to do it. See him do it here.

Obama will get angry with lovers of liberty and freedom. That could make him much more dangerous than he already is. Our President is the frightening, extremist, subversive he and his criminally-minded administration accuses others of being.

Yesterday, I saw (on TV) our hostile, wannabe an ass-kicker President speaking to the depraved extremist and seditious members of his cult. They didn't seem overly excited about his speech when I tuned in. Maybe they have finally discovered he is as stupid (or worse) than George Bush? Maybe they want some real "ass-kicking" going on? Maybe the welfare handouts (plundering and looting) aren't coming in fast enough for their liking? I don't know why they weren't excited, or fainting, or drooling over Obama, but it was surprising. I guess I don't understand criminal types.

Whatever it was that made them so quiet, when I tuned in, the President was characterizing America as being made up of two groups: workers/unions or corporations/capitalists. This idiotic Marxist view of the world leaves out the idea of independent private business ownership (the backbone of our once great economy).

Small independent operations are owned by a man or woman who is not a union member and would likely be insulted to be one. He or she prefers to make an honest living instead. And he or she is not a corporate worker or owner either. He or she prefers to call the shots.

Obama acts like the independent free American doesn't exist. He left them out of his dangerous, extremist, subversive vision for America not because he is ignorant of them, but because he wants them destroyed. Marxists always do.

Our hostile, dangerous, subversive, and extremist president (who continually lies to us) probably doesn't want his cult members thinking they have a choice other than slavery to the state (him) or those evil corporations they hate so much. If his stupid and depraved cult members have more choices than the president represents, he loses power. Marxists never like to lose power. It is everything to them.

So, as Woods becomes more popular (and he is), the leftist media (ABC,NBC,CBS, PBS, CNN, MSNBC, NY and LA Times, etc.) on behalf of Obama and the Democrats will likely make a concerted effort to attack Woods in any way they can. The race card will likely be played because most of the people in Wood's audiences, currently, are white. And as we have learned from the Democrats, clusters of white people are evil.

According to the deranged thinking on the left, whites committed racism simply by gathering together while white. No one planned it that way, it just happened. Thom Woods didn't invite only whites to his speech and whites didn't prevent non-whites from attending. But it will be their fault that non-whites in America are not very interested in lectures about freedom, liberty, Federalism, and the preservation of the Constitution. It won't matter that all are invited to attend.

There is no way for the criminal class in Washington or their hatchet men and women in left-wing media to fight against Thom Woods except to call him a racist. And that is my prediction of how they will attack him as he becomes more popular. Of course, the dangerous, extremist, subversive and criminally-minded officials in Washington (like the Department of Homeland Security) are already very aware of Mr. Woods because he is associated with the Mises organization. This organization threatens the government because it promotes liberty and the government does not. That simply won't do. He also threatens them because he is a loyal American. They are not and they know it. And they know he knows it.

And I know it.

And the people in Woos's audiences know it too.

This is why the DHS has already demonized patriots like Woods and me. And that is why they demonize the greatest statesman of our time, Congressman Ron Paul. We threaten them BECAUSE we are loyal Americans. They utterly hate that because they hate America. This is why they belong to organizations that represent totalitarian police-state governments. Organizations that should never be exist among a free people.

Mises, Libertarians, and independent thinkers disrupt over a half century of Marxist planning in America (taught in the public schools and the colleges and universities).

That makes the thugs angry.

Woods' scholarship is impeccable. His conclusions unassailable. His wisdom profound. The truth he tells is a threat to the totalitarian police-state thugs in the DHS, the Democratic Party, the Department of Justice, the IRS, the Judiciary, and the White House. They know it. And they despise what he stands for because it highlights their treachery, infidelity, sedition, despotism, and usurpation.

Pray for Mr. Woods. Because the diabolical criminal types in D.C. are starting to see the writing on the wall, and Mr. Woods is making it quite readable.

We will be free of their tyrannies and they will not be happy to give them up.

Madmen (and women) never are.

http://www.c-spanarchives.org/program/ID/233424

At Least the FBI Doesn't Want Pastor Jones Dead (I Guess).

2010-09-10T18:39:00.000-07:00

Let me get this straight. Americans can be assassinated (murdered) over seas with the say so of the President of the United States if they are caught aiding terrorists, but if you are an American in America, burn a Koran, and terrorists come after you, the federal government might NOT even get around to stopping the murderous Muslim terrorists because the feds have something better to do than stop a Muslim terrorist?

Even if Jones didn't burn the books, what could be an easier method of tracking down terrorists in the USA than to keep an eye on Pastor Jones? So I don't "get" how it is that if he burned the books, the FBI wouldn't be all over the place with surveillance on him.

If Islam is what Muslims and our muslimish president suggest (peaceful and just) there is no need to worry about Muslims going crazy, here or elsewhere, over a book burning (I oppose the burning of Korans by anyone). So what is the President worried about? Doesn't he tell us that Islam is peaceful? To claim that it is dangerous to burn the Koran is to CONFIRM EXACTLY Pastor Jones' opinion that Islam is evil.

See the president won't stop Muslim immigration, I can only conclude that it is because the President wants Muslims to come here and terrorize Americans into submission.

If Muslims would try to kill Jones or Americans overseas, then Islam is everything Jones says it is and the Obama administration and Congress are negligent in their responsibility to protect us from Muslims and warn Americans to be on their guard. Instead we hire Muslims into high security areas of the government, our hospitals, and the military.

And so it seems that President Obama appears to be lying to us about the true nature of Islam because by his warning to Jones he is admitting Islam is dangerous.

According to the reasoning used by the Department of Homeland Security then, it seems logical that Obama's support of Islam makes him more of a national security than, say, pro-life advocates. Pro-life advocates have murdered far fewer people than Obama's Muslim friends have. So it is actually the supporters of Muslims who pose more of a threat to national security than the supporters of pro-lifers. Our president is a supporter of Muslims and abortion rights advocates. It's a double whammy. In other words our president supports more profoundly larger and more dangerous violent groups than the pro-lifers do. The president and his co-abortion supporters in the Democratic Party have been responsible for snuffing out the lives of more Americans (in the womb) than Muslim terrorists may have killed anywhere ever. By comparison, the maligned pro-life advocates (Jones is probably one) who are demonized by vicious leftist in government, are practically pacifists.

It is odd that the terrorists have likely killed fewer innocents than the Obama Democrats. Democrats have snuffed out the lives of 48 million innocents in the womb. And terrorists? What have they done? Have they even murdered more than 500,000 thousand at the most, if that many? In comparison to the Democrats, the Muslims are more civilized.

The irony of this whole matter is that it is unquestionable that Pastor Terry Jones is helplessly and dearly in love with America, and Obama and his ilk detest her as much as the Muslim terrorists do (think: God Damn America and Reverend Wright!)

The big question is does the FBI love her as much as the shameful and ignorant Pastor Terry Jones they might get around to protect if they get the notion?

Sebelius Calls For Marxist Totalitarian "Reeducation"

2010-08-30T22:46:00.000-07:00

The ABC News (blog) is reporting that Kathleen Sebelius tells us that there is "a lot of reeducation to do” . Well of course she would say that. What else do the communists do but force their lies on others at gunpoint? In her mind the people must be stupid. They must not know what is good for them. They need to be grabbed by the neck and told what is good for them. And they need to be told this by those who consider themselves morally superior to others. They are the supremacists who choose for us.

Americans are resisting Commie Care Obamacare and that won't be tolerated.

The people are NOT to be free in America. That deviant thought needs to be punished.

It cannot be avoided in these situations. When you are screwing over your fellow man with communism and enslavement (and in this case desperately trying to hide it), you must come to the point of forcing them at gunpoint to believe your lies or else.

The communist reeducation of Americans by the Obama administration is a logical consequence of its own despotism (Wikipedia). When you have established communism, you have to keep cleansing the minds of citizens who think filthy, dirty, thoughts about liberty and freedom to choose. Such perverted thoughts are not allowed and must be erased from their minds, by gunpoint when necessary. If that doesn't work, jail sentences or financial ruination quickly follow. There must be a denial of material goodies and opportunities to advance. The dirty-minded people need to be brought to their knees and have their lives ruined for thinking perverted thoughts.

Necks must be stomped on; they deserve it for their demented thoughts of liberty.

Reeducation must come into play when enslavement in the government controlled schools hasn't quite kept up with the day to day operation of the plan to enslave. A balance has to be maintained. If American children happen to escape the communist indoctrination or change their minds in adulthood, a corrective measure has to be applied and the Communist supremacists must act quickly before evil thoughts of freedom grow stronger.

First we were told about the communist redistribution (going well). But we slipped up and resisted the redistribution of money for Obamacare. Now there must be reeducation. We MUST admire Mao the hero of the White House, or else. We must accept Mao's fellow communists in the White House and that is that.

Meanwhile, the CIA and FBI sit around twiddling their thumbs worrying about cocaine sniffers here and abroad. Our brave heroes to the rescue! Never mind that there are no more violent or murderous a people to have existed on earth than the communist Marxists brothers of our Obammunists in America, worry instead about the dope sniffers!

Marxist communism is robbery, enslavement, and murder set to law. No wonder the Democratic Party loves it.

Mao murdered nearly 38 million unarmed civilians. Stalin nearly 43 million. And the Democratic Party of America nearly 48 million (in the womb).

They are proud of themselves for this.

You must never be surprised when a Democrat, who condones the slaughter of nearly 50 million innocents in the womb, tells you you need to be reeducated.

Never.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reeducation_camp

http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/2010/08/sebelius-time-for-reeducation-on-obama-health-care-law.html

Additional reading on abortion as murder, thoughts on Camille Paglia:

http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fullcomment/archive/2008/09/23/andrea-mrozek-abortion-in-plain-english.aspx

Government Perverts And Their Airport Porno Machines

2010-08-06T00:48:00.000-07:00

This blog has been on high alert (see alert on the right) for months now because its author knew ahead of time that the US government is a pack of depraved perverts who were abusing citizens with body scanners at airports.

A TSA scandal has now been exposed and is being reported at Fox News and on the internet (San Francisco Chronicle online). By the way, there will ALWAYS be a body scan scandal when government is involved. And if you don't realize this then I'm sad to inform you that you are a stupid moron and didn't know it. Don't be mad at me.

Just get smart.

It appears the government perverts are trying to pretend that they would not store or collect nude images. According to the SFC, the ability to do so is disabled before shipment. What does that lame excuse mean? Is being disabled something as easy and simple as disabling security software on a home computer?

The truth is that the machines CAN collect and store images and the government insisted on that capability.

This is all so in keeping with government perverts who regularly sexually molest citizens during arrests and encounters with the police. You have to sexually molest citizens if there is chance they might possess natural mind-controlling substances!

It's the perverted American way!

These perverts (government officials) are the same people each one of us will be forced at gunpoint to hand over our most intimate medical records--photos, ex-rays, etc.--to. And these government perverts will also being doing your colonoscopy and pap-smears.

Getting raped by government will now come to mean more than a smart-aleck euphemism. It will become policy.

Getting molested and raped will become official government policy because the same people too stupid, demented, and depraved to realize that the body-scanner abuse HAD to happen (because of the law that absolute power corrupts) are the same people too stupid, demented, and depraved to see that forced government medical care sexual abuse will HAVE to happen (and happen at gunpoint).

It makes sense that it has come to this when you figure Democrats are the same people who led the "sexual-revolution" of the 1960s.

Unfortunately, cowardly Republican men who don't have genitals worth worrying about being exposed, or brains worth losing haven't been much help (save for a few brave souls). They were and are so pathologically afraid of getting injured or killed, that they are all too happy to have their own mothers, sisters, and daughters subjected to these depraved perverts in government.

Excuses and claims of innocence by perverts in government will be made. Only "crazy" people like me who make goofy non-official alerts about government perverts saw ahead of time the danger of giving this kind of power to government.

Apparently, it takes a Harvard scholar to not know government cannot be given this kind of power.

No, it takes someone not well-educated to figure that out.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/cmcginnis/detail??blogid=181&entry_id=69524

This is the most thorough story on the net I've found so far. (Info Wars)

Naturally, you won't find the perverts in charge of the leftist controlled mainstream media much opposed to this depravity (until perhaps decades later AFTER the abuse they supported or ignored occurred).

http://www.infowars.com/naked-body-scanners-monumental-cover-up-exposed/

Chris Matthews And His Anti-Constitution Guests

2010-07-14T18:39:00.000-07:00

Chris Matthews had two guests on his TV show today. One was David Corn from Salon, and the other was a woman. I didn't get her name, though I will try to find it.

Matthews suggested that republicans just don't get it. "It" being the need for Democratic Party policies. The woman acted concerned about our great capitalist system. And twice she said it was important to "soften the edges" of this system (to protect the vulnerable and poor no doubt). Of course, only democrats really know how to soften cruelties of life. We hear this time and again.

All agreed with her comments. She pointed to FDR and, if I recall correctly, LBJ and Kennedy to show how these established the legacy of "softening the edges" of capitalism.

Well the only tradition she could possibly be talking about is the tradition of usurping the Constitution so that democrats could bribe people for votes over the last half century.

Chris ran a very old audio clip of Ronald Reagan urging Americans to contact their representatives and tell them not to vote for Medicare. He warned about socialism and totalitarianism. The panel said his warnings did not come true and pointed out that Reagan would even go on to support Medicare at the federal level and before that (if I recall correctly) a medical program at the state level.

If Reagan did such a thing at the state level it is perfectly legitimate for him or any state to do so because that is where the power resides for such government programs. Such an act IS the legitimate power of the state government and Reagan would likely have known this. It seems the members of Matthew's panel didn't know this or weren't saying so. Much of the success of leftist media is the important bits of information they leave out. They have traditionally not wanted Americans to know how their government works. This was true for most of my life.

On the other hand there IS no power given to the federal government by the Constitution to run a Medicare type program. Reagan knew this.

Medicare is unconstitutional and after years of its entrenchment in the bowels of government, Reagan could not have dismantled it himself. Congress would have had to do that. The country wasn't ready for that. Democrats would never have tolerated and the full force of the party and their sycophants in the media would have brought Reagan down.

The imbecile, George Bush (43) could not even reform Social Security because of the hysteria created by democrats, how does the panel think Reagan could have eliminated Medicare?

It will take democrats agreeing to dismantle the system for it to happen and as the panel showed by their own current support for Medicare, we are no where near that place even these many decades after Reagan made his appeal and served in the presidency.

The only alternative to this criminally-minded thievery and overthrow of the Constitution is secession. And with upping the ante and increased stealing of tax-payers dollars with Obamacare (and the ensuing totalitarian state it will create) that might be the only way to escape so great this criminal enterprise.

The Constitution is that which "softens the edges" of all evils, which may explain why Matthews and his ilk continue to trample it.

Outside of the Constitution, only God can soften the edges of life.

Update July 17, 2010: Have not found the name of the woman in the interview.

Cops Shows

2010-07-10T17:13:00.000-07:00

I ~~like~~ used to like cop shows. I grew up on them. What dad watched, we watched. We watched Dragnet and Perry Mason (lawyer show). We watched Gunsmoke and the Wild Wild West when we got older and watched TV on our own. Those guys were cool and utterly handsome. I loved MacGyver. We watched Combat too, though it was a military "show". And there was James Bond, the ultimate cop. I do not like James Bond movies. We watched Bonanza and Big Valley. Both very big on justice and decency.

When we were young and dad wasn't around we watched Andy of Mayberry. We grew up respecting cops and soldiers.

I used to get all mushy when I saw a guy in uniform. Now it's terrifying. Cops are now the public's' enemy. But I'm always hoping for a good cop show to come along again. Especially one that understands the human condition and shows cops treating the public with respect. Law and Order is way too liberal and preachy. Christians are often portrayed as the bad guys. Old cop shows were never like that. So I thought the new USA network cop show called Memphis Beat might be good like the old shows.

I like the first show. It was charming. Human. Real. Then I saw this week's installment and I think it might go the way of modern cop shows with vicious nasty cops portrayed as the good guys. What provoked that response was the scene where the hero of the story had just left after speaking with a rich citizen. When he was done talking with them he said "I hate rich people".

Well, hello greed, evil, and Karl Marx.

This is not what we need. We have enough cop shows with cops who are portrayed as hating the people they "serve". We don't need shows that teach people to hate the rich. We already know our cops hate us, but do they have to glorify it on TV by targeting someone to openly hate?

Who consumes that kind of TV?

Real cops? Probably. No doubt Kim Jong IL and Hugo Chavez.

I do like the USA network show called White Collar. I wonder how long it will be before it gets bad (e.g. lefty, hateful, bigoted, and un-American)?

Evil Officer (Ex), Criminal, Thomas White Is Convicted

2010-07-02T02:32:00.000-07:00

And evil cop goes to jail but not for long enough. Vdare has this article about the sad story of a stupid traffic cop who brutally shoots at a fellow citizen and paralyzes him for no good reason [except the cop is coward]. According to the story, the cop loses his badge and gun forever.

Good.

Americans better wake up and dismantle their abusive police departments before THEY are injured and murdered by the cops.

If cops are so afraid to do their jobs that they just mow down innocent civilians, then they should probably find less scary work like pig farming or selling lacy panties at Victoria's Secret or where ever they offer soft frilly frou-frou things girls like to sell, buy, and prance around in.

http://www.vdare.com/misc/100519_peters.htm

Corrections and revisions to blog posts occur frequently. Thank you for you patience.
.

Biggest Threat To Americans (and others): Government Officials (with or without guns)

2010-06-21T15:31:00.000-07:00

Answer this questions honestly. If a fifteen year old starts throwing rocks at you, do you pull out your gun and shoot him dead? There is the story at the Daily Mail (UK)

No?

I didn't think so. That is because you are not insane.

Is this patrol officer must be one of those home grown terrorists our Department Of Homeland Security chief is talking about these days?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1285302/Mexico-demands-investigation-U-S-border-agent-shoots-teenager-dead--throwing-stones-him.html

Corrections and revisions to blog posts occur frequently. Thank you for your patience.

People Who Torture And Kill Animals

2010-06-21T15:07:00.001-07:00

One hallmark of murderous criminals is their ruthless treatment of innocent animals.

Evil cop slaughters non-vicious dog (about the 4:40 mark) WARNING: DOG IS SHOT DEAD IN VIDEO BY MORONIC COP.

The last thing this stupid man ought to be is a cop. Shame on the department that keeps him or hires him.

Is there something wrong with the water in Missouri? It seems to create Hitler type folks--vicious and heartless.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4kJVnA5KXJw&feature=player_embedded

http://www.hsus.org/acf/cruelty/publiced/cruelty_serial_killers.html

Corrections and revisions to blog posts occur frequently. Thank you for your patience.

Obama Incites *ss-Kicking Violence?

2010-06-09T21:24:00.000-07:00

It would seem so.

In April I wrote about how our first black president Bill Clinton lectured Americans that people ought to be careful about the things they say. It seems he had in mind the idea that words ARE actions. But what he really meant was that only right-wingers words were actions and real incitements.

Barney Frank's incitement to harm AIG employees wasn't implied when he threatened to reveal their addresses? SEIU's incitements at the home of a banker doesn't terrorize two innocent children?

And now, Obama's inquiring into kicking BP "ass" isn't an incitement provoking attacks at BP gas stations?

Here is an article that ought to send Bill Clinton to the nearest microphone to lecture Obama about words and deeds. But you will not hear left-wingers complaining about the violence they and their fellows lunatics incite (WREG tv online).

The title of the article reads " Bullets Shatter Glass at BP Gas Station". While subtitles read "Reports of BP rage surfacing across the country... "Several BP signs damaged in New York" and "Windows shattered at station in Southaven..."

What Obama, Clinton, Pelosi, and Barney Frank do not realize is that their words are inciting hatred (by their own standard) and civil war, but they point the accusing finger at others who are not inciting such things.

There was a plethora of comments lately about Obama's seeming "coolness" about the oil spill disaster. I have mentioned elsewhere in my blogs his ruthlessness and viciousness. I have even mentioned that his public personality reads like the definition of a factor one psychopath. The list of behaviors that typify this type of psychopath reads as follows:

Glibness/superficial charm
Grandiose sense of self-worth
Pathological lying
Cunning/manipulative
Lack of remorse or guilt
Emotionally shallow
Callous/lack of empathy
Failure to accept responsibility for own actions

Does this not describe our president to a tee? No wonder people have to urge him to act emotional, he seems unable to do it naturally.

http://criminalbehaviorusa.blogspot.com/2010/04/bill-clinton-our-first-black-president.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KAdhQoIIhDk

http://www.wreg.com/news/wreg-bp-rage-ms,0,5893229.story

What Do Hillary Clinton, Karl Marx, Mao, Stalin, and Fidel Castro Have In Common?

2010-05-30T09:54:00.000-07:00

They all have the criminally-minded attitude that other peoples' legally acquired money is the business of a government which thinks they have too much.

Hillary's recent comments about the rich are recorded here at Politico. Hat-tip Drudge.

An excerpt reads:

"The rich are not paying their fair share in any nation that is facing the kind of employment issues [America currently does] — whether it's individual, corporate or whatever [form of] taxation forms," Ben Smith, Politico

This is like a thief standing in your house complaining about the quality of you possessions he is stealing. He doesn't even belong there in the first place.

Her chickens are coming home to roost and her fellow democrats laid the disastrous economic eggs long ago and now ready to be hatched. The problem is the unlawful spending by congress and not that the rich aren't paying enough for it.

The thieving criminal-types in the Democratic Party usurped Constitutional powers during the Roosevelt era and started the nation on a course of greater and more expensive unlawful welfare programs such as Medicare and the Drug Prescription benefit (passed by the GOP). They had no authority creating these programs which are not only only unconstitutional, but criminal in nature because they are theft by any rational definition.

The main purpose of these programs was to create a vehicle to plunder the wealth of citizens while bribing poor and middle class people to vote for democrats. This is why democrats promote democracy and not republicanism (republics). Democrats promote the incorrect notion that we are a just a democracy because they want to continue to persuade the citizens to vote for criminal activity.

That is why Sean Penn doesn't think Chavez is a dictator because people voted for him. By his standard if all Americans of every state voted to jail every movie star in Hollywood for life, it appears that Sean Penn would consider that OKAY because everyone voted on it "democratically". This is the sort of intellectually inferior thinking that comes from the left.

Since there are more poor and, especially lower, middle-class people than rich, this voting for theft by democrats worked very well for most of the last century. It kept democrats in control of congress for a very long time. And you must remember that it is Congress which "holds the purse". And from that purse democrats bribed the less wealthy to vote for them. This is immoral behavior and it is policy Hillary supports and demands even more of.

It's now about to explode in Democrats' faces because the money tree out back is dead. They killed it.

We regular folks may suffer greatly because of evil monsters like Hillary Clinton who voted for continuing these kinds of FDR usurpations. And now since too many expensive programs have been created, spurred on by democrats lust for power, the whole thing is about to collapse. She is foolish to believe the rich can do much to help the democrats out of the mess democrats created. There isn't that much money available from the rich. The numbers are just too large now.

Only God is rich enough to pay for what the criminally-minded democrats have created.

Over the decades, no one could convince democrats to stop their insane spending programs. They just kept spending and kicking the economic-disaster-can down the road for the next group of leaders to knock around. The leftist media pilloried George Bush (41) for breaking his no-new-taxes promise, but never pilloried the democratic congress for breaking its promise to reduce spending. The republicans wanted to cut spending at that time, the democrats agreed and then refused. But only Bush 41 was called a liar for breaking his promise.

The republicans new the disaster was coming but couldn't keep power if they tried to stop it. Democrats always knew they had the republicans over the welfare barrel. They knew what they were doing but wouldn't stop doing it because it brought them political power. Every time the GOP tried to talk about deficit reduction, democrats became hysterical and accusing the GOP of wanting to throw granny, children, and the poor under the bus. That is how they kept their bribery, spendin, printing, and voting scam going for decades.

Those functions for which the federal government is constitutionally authorized, like war, now get blamed for breaking the bank. This demonstrates how utterly stupid or utterly evil democrats are. They created this financial disaster by spending on programs not authorized and want to blame the rich for the mess democrats caused by the unauthorized ones.

Democrats spent nearly 70 years bribing old folks with Social Security and then Medicare and now they are throwing the elderly to the wolves because their bribes used to garner votes have become too costly. It's time to bribe the young immigrants and there isn't enough value in the dollar to print for it. That makes democrats very dangerous now (like a crack addict in need of a fix) because they cannot continue to bribe, spend, print, and kick the economic disaster can down the road. This will enrage them and they will spin out of control blaming everyone but themselves. Then the dangerous times begin in earnest.

Democrats are going to be crazy lunatics inciting what the Stalin and Mao incited last century: hatred of the rich. They will lock people up critics. If blood flows in the streets over this it will be because of the Hillary Clintons of America ginning up "hatred" for business people. Where is her husband to criticize people for incitement? Hiding behind some bimbo perhaps?

When President Obama recently chided his critics for calling him (or his party) socialists or Marxists, he appeared offended because, as he pointed out, socialists and Marxists murdered millions of innocent civilians last century. And according to Mr. Obama, by calling Obama a Marxist implies he could be a murderer.

Mr. Obama's stupidity is breathtaking. Just how exactly did that slaughter happen?

It happened because evil people like Hillary and Obama (Stalin, Mao, etc) nurtured "hatred" of the rich! Then evil people like Bill Maher and Chris Matthews chime in by suggesting that the president shoot or murder capitalists. What are we supposed to think? Matthews must think the Chinese gave those it executed a fair trial.

Leftists are crazy people.

The only logical thing to think is that, like the Marxists overseas, the Marxists in the White House and Congress will demonize the rich, jail the monsters they invent, take our guns, and let the destruction begin. This doesn't just stay at top either, it goes down to the average citizen, who must be tossed into the den to feed the hungry lions of envy.

This is how 100 plus million unarmed civilians get murdered.

This is why the democrats want to take away our guns. They want us (their opponents) destroyed financially, jailed, or dead. As dead as Chris Matthews suggests. As shot as Maher wishes. As jailed as Sean Penn demands (News Busters). This is how the Marxist tyranny begins, it begins with demonization of the rich who lawfully acquire their money.

And this is why the love of money (by Hillary, FDR, Obama, and Democrats) is the root of all evil. It causes unbelievable suffering. They, in their self-righteous superiority probably think that the evil part of loving money refers only to rich people having money. It does not as not all rich people are evil. Few are probably no more evil than Obama or Hillary. But the love of money being the root of evil also refers to those who DON'T have much money but immorally envy those who do. And it suggests that evil is done because the poor might envy of the rich.

Democrats (rich and poor) commit a grave sin because they envy the rich. It is they who love money, the root of all evil.

The Democratic Party staked its entire political agenda (outside of sexual corruption and perversion) on the cultivation of greed among the poor and middle class Americans.

Criminally-minded people like Hillary Clinton are now setting up class warfare. This ends with mass murder by government. It always does. It did with the French Revolution. The same lesson was taught last century. Hillary has neglected to learn it. We see how it is beginning to happen when about a week ago leftist union thugs terrorized the children of a banker. Barney Frank led in this sort of barbaric behavior last year with his threat to give out the addresses of AIG employees. If continued, this ultimately leads to violence and murder. The violence and murder of Stalin and Mao.

And this is how government preps to murder tens of millions: create "hatred" of the rich. This is what Obama is doing. This is what Hillary is doing. That is what Stalin and Mao did.

Mrs. Clinton needs to think for a brief moment that everything she believes might be exactly wrong and opposite of what her professed faith--Christianity--teaches. Only then can she turn around and head away from what R. J. Rummel calls Democide.

If not the results will be worse than the criminal civil war Lincoln prosecuted.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0510/Clinton_The_rich_are_not_paying_their_fair_share.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awwMTL9c74g

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hY-CyEYLiSk

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tim-graham/2010/03/08/sean-penn-suggests-prison-time-journalists-who-call-hugo-chavez-dictator

http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/COM.ART.HTM

Obama Ain't Black Enough?

2010-05-29T16:09:00.000-07:00

And he is, apparently, not menacing enough either.

Bill Maher says so.(Real Clear Politics). Bill said

I thought when we elected a black president, we were going to get a black president. You know, this [BP oil spill] is where I want a real black president. I want him in a meeting with the BP CEOs, you know, where he lifts up his shirt so you can see the gun in his pants. That's -- (in black man voice) 'we've got a motherfu**ing problem here?' Shoot somebody in the foot.

Maybe Obama needs to be brandishing a gun like the co-religionist of Obama's father, Saddam Hussein? He could grow a big ugly mustache and wear a military uniform too. It would round his carefully cultivated tin-horn dictator image and it doesn't even have to have the racial overtones Maher suggests..

It's the perfect image for an evil, vicious, dangerous, seditious, subversive like Barack No-Relation-To-Saddam Hussein Obama.

So I wonder if Obama is going to buy an illegal gun with the registration number scratched off and wave it around in front of BP officials? Nyuk, nyuk, what a funny joke. Stick it in his pants. What a dignified image.

I told you that democrats are dangerous extremists. They continue to incite real violence while pretending that disagreeing with Obama is incitement.

These people are deranged. They are genuine lunatics. That makes these days exceedingly dangerous.

I wrote previously that Obama would likely be blamed for not being black enough (when the economy collapses in earnest), but I didn't expect vicious, dangerous, extremist, white liberals like Maher to start it. I anticipated blacks would do it out of embarrassment. After all, why would they want the worst president ever to be a black guy? That was a miscalculation on my part. Silly me, I forgot liberal democrats feel obligated to tell blacks what to do. Maher has gotten ahead of it, I suppose.

Do white liberals like Maher think blacks will let them off the hook once the race war these white liberals are inciting starts?

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2010/05/29/maher_obama_not_acting_like_a_real_black_president.html

Big Union Preps for the 2010 Election

2010-05-24T04:35:00.001-07:00

It was reported last week at the New York Times, The Hill Online, and in the right-wing media, that unions will be spending a lot of money in the upcoming 2010 elections. Estimates are 100 million dollars. This is not surprising considering that democrats dropped about a billion dollars electing their pampered, spoiled, arrogant, vicious, dangerous, extremist, seditious, Marxist, nitwit candidate--Barack Obama-- to the office of the presidency over a year ago.

And that was money spent on just one guy.

But what is not being reported, and is long overdue, is that unions, now and in the past, have had, not only millions, but billions of dollars which they have refused to use to make life better for American workers.

Instead of taking the billions of dollars unions have collected over the decades and creating businesses and schools in which they could hire workers and pay them good wages, union leaders have instead merely created a lucrative business (the union business) dedicated to bullying and shaking down legitimate businesses.

The problem with creating a business to help workers steal money from employers is that it has driven manufacturing offshore, destroyed businesses altogether, and thereby eliminated, not only a good amount of job opportunities for blue-collar workers, but diminished the kinds of jobs any nation needs to ensure its national security.

Why is that?

Well, it is because they are, obviously, criminally-minded people who make a lot of easy money for themselves demanding that real businesses be more virtuous than they are. It's easier to make money off of businesses which know how to make money than to have to make ones own effort to be productive. In other words, union leaders are lazy bums. And from what I seen, so are their rank and file members.

Why haven't unions started their own automobile company with all the union dues they have collected over the decades? They could have provided the lavish work environment and wages they demanded General Motors provide.

But they have refused.

Or, they could have started a company like Wal Mart. Then peopled it with workers working for the kinds of wages unions think they ought to make. And it could have offered the benefits Big Union demands. But they didn't do that for American workers, though, with all that money, they easily could have.

Why didn't they do it?

The first reason they didn't do it is because they are criminal types and it easier to steal from those who already are helping workers by providing jobs. The next reason is that they don't care about workers; they only pretend to care. Finally, if they opened a REAL business (meaning an honest one) they would have to actually WORK hard.

And Big Union is too lazy for that.

Also, I reckon they know that the demands Big Union makes on real businesses wouldn't allow them to pay workers the wages they insist on. Big Union's lies about businessmen would be exposed. Then Big Union leaders might have to get a real job. That must scare them.

The truth is Big Union leaders have a lucrative business bossing around successful business owners and stealing their money from them under the guise of representing workers. And it's a snap. No hard work involved.

Instead of helping the American worker, Big Union has driven manufacturing from the country and eliminated good job opportunities for people without college education.

Big Union is to blame, not only for their lazy theft, but for stripping us of the manufacturing needed for national security.

Furthermore, it should be illegal to unionize government workers. It dangerously concentrates power and pits government workers AGAINST citizen taxpayers. It creates a class of citizens who have more rights than taxpayers. Regular workers cannot (and ought not) manipulate laws to increase their wages like government workers can through their unions. They are like insiders trading on the information they glean while running the levers of state power.

They are able to increase their prosperity at the point of a gun through laws.

This is NOT the American way.

http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/99103-unions-100m-to-save-the-dems

Corrections and revisions to blog posts occur frequently. Thank you for your patience.

Nazi Storm Troopers In Waiting Slaughter Dog: Grown Men Terrorize Woman and Child

2010-05-23T15:38:00.000-07:00

It's time to end the drug war. Clearly, the cops have become a worse problem than drug users. Only deranged and mentally unstable adults did what the cops do in the video below.

UPDATE: May 27, 2010

Judge Andrew Napolitano goes after the stupid cops who terrorized a family and killed their dog. He demands several times in the video that the cops should be put through the justice system. The Nuremberg defense doesn't work anymore in America and it is time for cops, prosecutors, and judges to wake up and stop acting like idiots or we will make sure they are the ones sitting in jail.

"When are the cops who did this going to be arrested and put in jail where they belong?" Asks Judge Napolitano. (You Tube/Fox News)

Please contact Mayor Bob McDavid Mayor of Columbia, Missouri and thank him for having the decency to see that the arrest video was made public.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gw4K-H65_bc
http://www.gocolumbiamo.com/Council/Meet_The_Council/mayor.php

Corrections and revisions to blog posts occur frequently. Thank you for your presence.

President Obama and His Visit With Phillipe Calderon

2010-05-19T10:16:00.000-07:00

Our US president makes sure to tell the president of Mexico that he will review the new Arizona law to make sure the language of the law doesn't promote suspicion of innocent people of color and so forth. The only people we can be suspicious of in America these days are whites like the cop who investigated an apparent break in of the black Harvard professor who happens to be a friend of Obama (Guardian).

The cop was policing while white and that is why the left jumped to the suspicion that there was something wrong.

The words of assurance come from the same liar in chief who condemns others while supporting Department of Homeland Security regulations that promote hysterical suspicions about veterans, people who vote for third party candidates, and pro-abortion citizens.

Why is Obama concerned that Arizona might be suspicious about bad non-citizens when and he and his administration are suspicious about good citizens?

The answer is clear: he is a hypocrite who does not hesitate to create suspicion about groups of good citizens he "hates" and smears with accusations of dangerous extremism.

It is Obama and the DHS which are the suspicious characters and deserving of being viewed suspiciously.

Also Standard Operating Procedure: Shoot 'Em Up Jack-Boot Storm-Trooping

2010-05-17T07:28:00.000-07:00

Visions of Nazi tactics now regularly used by American police [-state forces] against Americans never seem to cease before our eyes.. Gone is the image of Barney Fife and Andy, the citizen's helper.

This is in large part because of the terroristic Drug War against the American people by government at all levels--local, state, and federal. And it is because members of both major political parties continue to allow these Nazi tactics.

And soon, when the evil Drug War against citizens ends, the cop's guns will be trained on more innocents because of the dangerous immigrant groups (Hispanics and Muslims) government intentionally let into our country in order to intentionally create a crime problem and a national security problem that will require an even larger and more police-state.

Evil people need steady work too.

When will this end?

When despotism has run its course?

May God forbid it.

But for now we see only, daily, a lengthy train of abuses by our lawless enforcement officers: asset forfeiture (guilty before proven innocent), denial of 5th Amendment rights (plea bargaining), tasering (torture) and shooting children and the innocent (murder).

When cops enter a home guns-a-blazing it is with a knowing promise to risk the lives of the innocent. They simply do not care. In their depraved and warped minds they are there to protect the public even if it means to murder the public. Someone is rampaging in our streets and the cops are going to stop them even if it means the cops are the ones rampaging.

In his or her own mind, the cop's defense for the rest of his life will likely be the Nuremberg defense.

And if so, may the images of the dead child forever haunt him or her.

Oh wait, he or she probably doesn't have a conscience. Which is probably why he or she went into police work (a sure sign of mental instability these days if ever there was one).

So, never mind.

(sweeping things under my rug)

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100516/ap_on_re_us/us_police_search_girl_killed

The Nuremberg Defense: Standard Operating Procedure in US Law Enforcement

2010-05-16T20:17:00.000-07:00

It seems to me that the bulk of what makes a civilization civil is dependent on individuals habitually being able to distinguish right from wrong. That seems to be impossible in America these days.

And cops are amongst the worst offenders.

Here is an interesting video from You Tube with John Stossel about asset forfeiture and cops.

Aren't there some cops out there with enough brains to be embarrassed about this form of thievery to complain about it?

Our First Black President, Bill Clinton, Is At It Again

2010-05-11T02:32:00.000-07:00

I wrote an article last week about former President Bill Clinton called Bill Clinton: Our First Black President Lectures Americans About Citizenship. In it I discussed how Mr. Clinton equates words with actions in order to silence those he disagrees with politically. His is the kind of thinking one expects from leftists who are ever evil, ever committed to evil doings, and ever proud of them. They are also ever unaware of their own evil. The even think they are virtuous.

Even that old sleazeball leftist Gore Vidal thought Mr. Bill was a threat to liberty; he continues to not disappoint us. And now it seems that the old media is suddenly trying to resurrect Mr. Bill's reputation. I don't mean his reputation as an adulterer, but his reputation as a leader.

And speaking about resurrection, if Clinton really believed in the important one (that of Jesus Christ's) he'd be telling those who stick a microphone in front of his big fat nose that he could no longer be a democrat since they are pack of murderous thieves (abortion, Marxism). Does he still wave the bible around for the cameras these days?

But enough about my fantasies.

Mr. Bill is pleased to be in league with seditious and usurpatious government "servants" who simply love to destroy the lives of people they don't like for things they allow themselves to do. For example, nine Michigan men currently stand accused of threatening the government (BET/AP/John Seewer). They are still in jail for joking about killing people.

Yet the president of the United States can joke about sending in predator drones against some young men should they try to...well...do something to his daughters and ha ha ha, everyone laughs. That's just peachy. But don't let working class schmucks without the benefit of a fine education and instructions in gentility make any such joke or else. Especially if they are white and claim to be Christians.

Only democrats are allowed to joke about killing people.

And when they are not making jokes about attacking people, democrats are already and actually conspiring to snuff out the lives of 48 million unborn human organisms in the womb while at the same time they rant and rave hysterically about allegedly deadly carbon emissions, salt, and trans-fats which seem to be slaying citizens in the streets.

Their derangement almost make us wish their mothers had made other "choices".

Democrats consider themselves privileged characters. They can, for example, destroy Sarah Palin and attempt to destroy her children, and it is never considered hate speech. Only republicans are capable of hate speech and only democrats can define what it is. Any criticism of a left-winger is considered hate; and virtually no amount of criticism of right-wingers, no matter how hateful, is classified as hate. It's a clever little game. The leftist gods have measured and weighed hate, outlined it boundaries, and established it as a law of the universe according to their own opinion.

They're real Isaac Newtons these geniuses.

They seized this power for themselves in order to destroy others. They invent fictional hate, accuse others of it, and make sure it doesn't ever apply to them. Well, the fraud is getting old and they are guilty of violating their own "laws".

And now our first black president is whining again about citizens his party hates according to their own standard of hate . It's those naughty right-wing citizens again. They're a bunch of uncooperative pests who ought to bow down like the two moderators recently did in their interview on the PBS show Need To Know. (In Mr. Bill's world the name of the show ought to be What We Want You To Know and No More Than That.)

In the interview we learned that Mr. Bill is not so happy about the new media. Leftists generally think the new media is out of control. And this explains why they have belittled Fox News, claiming it isn't really "news" as if this were a scientific fact and they could prove it. This also explains why they are threatening to institute the unfair Fairness Doctrine again. And it explains why they are trying to institute the doctrine without having to institute it directly. It also explains why they are pushing net neutrality. Who knows what else they are up to behind our backs.

Perhaps this thing?

You see, I'm not just making this up.

Mr. Bill and his pack of wolves want the old media back and they want the new media enslaved in similar government chains if the new media continues to include robust freedom of speech for right-wingers.

They cannot have that! No tolerance there. BAD CHANGES!

We saw just the other day, our second black president (the half-white Mr. Barack Hussein Obama) is frustrated with iPads, X Boxes, and such devices (Google News). He is not pleased with alternative sources of media either. This has to be as frustrating for him as it is for the leaders of North Korea or Iran. People making all those free choices to fill their thoughts with whatever they choose always unnerves despots.

Our dictator for another day said:

"...information becomes a distraction, a diversion, a form of entertainment, rather than a tool of empowerment, rather than the means of emancipation..."

Ouuuu, information will keep us from emancipation. Ah yes, I'm just here pounding away at these blogs for fun and amusement hoping to enslave myself and others when they read them. You caught me Mr. P!

The president is clamping tyrannical chains of despotism on my medical records, my doctor, and my health decisions (soon to be controlling every aspect of my life including the foods in my refrigerator) and an X Boxes will enslave me?

Does he sound insane or what?

I mean really. You really have to question the sanity of President Obama or you don't have your head on straight.

He acts like he is worried that people are too busy playing with gadgets to stop him from dooming the next several generations to enslavement by his Marxist scheme of redistribution. And if they would just put down their toys they might be able to stop him from the heist he is conducting and chains he is rattling. If only it were true.

A little self-control is all Mr. Obama needs to stop his evil conduct.

But let me get back to Mr. Bill's unhappiness about a perceived lack of control in the alternative media. To be clear, he is not referring to the kind of out-of-control conduct one sees when a enraged wife is throwing ashtrays or various household items at her husband because he is having sex with any pretty woman who slithers by. No, it's not that kind of out-of-control. The out-of-control he is talking about is the out-from-under-the-thumb kind of control.

The media is more out of the control of the government than it has ever been since television and radio news started. This is very scary for the devious and seditious left which has controlled the media all of my life.

Democrats don't know how to manipulate the people into a Marxist state, a one world government, or destroy the Constitution if they cannot control the media (I mean without all that pesky bloodshed and violence). And I don't think they expected freedom to pop up all over the place when the unfairness doctrine was abandoned, cable news opened up, and the internet became the Gutenberg Bible of our age.

Democrats want to chain the new media to government like the Catholic Church once chained the bible to the pulpit so the people cannot see the truths for themselves.

We cannot be trusted to discover the truth ourselves as they are superior and must choose which truths we are to have. They must interpret it for us.

I also don't think Democrats expected that the American people would educate themselves with the new media. Especially after they spent the better part of the last century making sure school children did not learn about the blessings of liberty and the heritage of our Founding.

They must be miffed. They almost got away with it and a free media will spoil their plans to steal a people and their nation: their own people, their own nation.

So great is the impact of the alternative media on the self-education of the American citizen that it could only take some fantastic galactic accident to, say, wipe out Fox News and cable TV, and force citizens back to the old government controlled media again.

Something wildly unlikely (like satellites banging into each other and knocking out the satellite feed) would have to occur in order to force Americans back to the old corrupt media like PBS which grovels and bows before the big toe of Bill Clinton.

As I was saying, Mr. Bill was recently at a PBS interview. And the moderator asks at the 3:30 mark in the video link provided below:

"Sir [Bill Clinton], you were president at a time of enormous transformation in terms of how Americans found things out. You, when you became, president there was not an internet, ah there were some cable, but it was no way at the level where things are now. And it could be when you were running in 1992, you could have a common conversation. And it got harder and harder and harder as you were president, and now as you do your global work, what was it that changed, do you think?" (VodPod online)

Mr. Bill replies:

"I think there were a couple of things that changed. First of all, you could see this in the nineties, but it's much more prevalent now. That is in the nineties there were more and more cable channels, and more and more competition for peoples' attention and communication was getting more rapid...there were only 50 sites on the World Wide Web when I took office..." [here the president points and jabs his finger in the direction of the two moderators, about the 4:20 mark].

Oh, that dreaded change! The media changed! Change must really be bad for Mr. Bill!

To be fair, he does say it is good that cyberspace has grown since then. But there is a downside. There must be a downside for leftists when it comes to freedom of speech. The downside is they hate it. But in particular, for Mr. Bill, the problem is that there are facts floating about it which are "not right".

Oh dear. that sounds like more change for Mr. Bill. Now we have facts which are not right whereas before the new media the facts were right. Clearly the people are too stupid to sort out the facts from the falsehoods. And, of course, that means government intervention.

If I believed Freud, I'd say Mr. Bill committed a type of Freudian slip.

The more accurate way for Mr. Bill to have said it would be that the falsehoods are not right and he worries about these falsehoods. But duh. What person in their right mind doesn't worry about falsehoods? Oops! Did I imply Mr. Bill was in his right mind?

Sorry.

It's like I don't worry about falsehoods? Of course I do and that is precisely why the federal government or people like Bill Clinton shouldn't be in charge of the media.

It is laughable to hear a man, whose administration lied for years and years AND years about Waco (and heaven knows what else) complain about falsehoods spread by others.

If I'm willing that the truth exists along with the errors in the new media and willing to sort them out myself, why isn't he? What is he afraid of? What gives him the right to assume commoners cannot sort them out? Is he more interested in the truth than I am?

Hardly.

He is even a master of deceit himself and by virtue of that cannot possibly be interested in insuring that the truth reigns in the new media. If he really was interested in the truth he would not be recommending more government control of the media.

It is government who is the biggest threat to freedom. The last century demonstrates this and our Founders taught it.

Facts are always inherently right, otherwise they are not facts. By this I mean they are also accurate and therefore cannot be factually "wrong" As Mr. Bill suggests. Mr. Bill's slip may be that he knows the old media told lies and sold them as truths and he misses that. A fact is a particle of truth or about truth that is always "right" and if the alleged fact is wrong, then it is no longer a fact, but a falsehood. So when the president says a fact is not right he is either committing a factual error himself or if a proverbial Freudian slip which confirms that he knows the truth was muffled by the old media and he just plain misses that.

What Mr. Bill was most likely trying to say is that he is worried that some facts reach the public, but should not. For instance, it wasn't broadcast about the universe that FDR was doing his mistress behind the little-woman's back, but it was broadcast across the universe that Bill was doing Jennifer Flowers and diddling with Monica Lewinsky. Mr. Bill's complaint appears to be that some facts get out and some didn't (at least not at that time).

I imagine that (since it was before the Internet was up and running for everyone) Mr. Bill thought he would get away with his adultery like FDR (and JFK) did as the leftist media would cover it up. But things changed (oh no, more change!) quickly because of the internet and the power of the alternative media. Mr. Bill was unable to get away with what American presidents had gotten away with in the past.

I think he expected the same for himself and that is probably why he stayed in politics while he continued to stab his wife in the back with his adultery and infidelity.

Mr. Bill worries about our losing "a common fact base" (at the 6:00 mark). Oh, he must really care about us. And to prove he is right he talks about the three major networks that were the main source of TV news when he was growing up. I'm from his generation and I'll agree that they were our main sources on television. He liked the news media back in that day. But in that day the news provided only a narrow and limited disbursal of information skewed to the leftist worldview.

Now you get the picture?

He characterized this limited disbursal of "facts" and what was the leftist manipulation of the facts as "...enough competition to keep each other honest." That, according to Mr. Bill, allow the citizens have "a common dialog" (6:48 mark). Just imagine what an unlimited disbursal of the the "facts" might have led to back then?

Anyway, the news folks back then were professionals and if only we could be as impressed with them as Mr. Bill is. They were better, therefore, and we the ignorant peons exercising free speech and participating as a free press are inferior. Mr. Bill probably wants us to have a license to speak. All despots think that way.

There were more "right" facts back then according to Mr. Bill. Yet, even a five year old can be taught to tell the truth. It's not that hard. It's complicated only if you are left-wing lunatic.

We are told by Mr. Bill that people--citizens-- could better talk with each other back then. I guess this is because of the spoon fed facts coming from government via the media. We were pacified and got along better with each other and our leaders because, essentially, we believed the same deceptions government provided us through the government approved media.

Oh for those good old deceptive days again!

From my perspective, the truth of it is just the opposite as Mr. Bill presents. The professionals were the gatekeepers against the truth. They told us the facts all right, but they only told us the facts they or the government wanted us to hear and they manipulated those facts.

From my perspective, the days of the limited media which Mr. Bill romanticizes insured that there wasn't a dialog. There was only silence or violence and a small peep from the right.

That's all there was.

There was just a one-way flow of information from the government to the people via the media they controlled. They were in bed together and freedom of speech was held down and smothered with the pillow. The people had no voice whatsoever. And I believe that explains much about why the 1960s and 70s became so violent.

Mr. Bill does mention the issues raging at that time (Vietnam and Civil Rights) but he acts like the media of that time wasn't responsible for having gotten us to that place by manipulating the people on behalf of the government. If there was a dialog on common facts going on such that we ought to replicate it, then why was there so much civil unrest and violence?

It is more likely that the media he praises from that time period exacerbated the problems by representing, in a good light, only one viewpoint: the leftist viewpoint, and demonizing others and putting them in a bad light.

In other words the last century in America was a nightmare WHILE the left controlled the media through government. So don't blame the new media for, as Obama is apt to say--for cleaning up the mess--the old media left behind.

It wouldn't be for decades, until Ann Coulter's time, before the lame-brains on left learned that others were being left out of their happy, lopsided, common fact-based conversation when she noted that up until the new media came along conservatives had no microphone and could not be heard.

Throughout the golden years Mr. Bill yearns for, conservatives had only one outlet: Bill Buckley. There was his National Review magazine and his PBS show Firing Line and virtually nothing else in comparison to everything else the left possessed from the all the major newspapers to all the major non-cable networks and then some (Time Magazine, Newsweek) and so forth.

All of it was from the left.

Okay, there were small squeaks and squawks sneaking in from the right (like George Will at ABC). But the left had it all and never once complained about the need for a Fairness Doctrine to let the right come into the national conversation on the major television networks.

The main news programs were completely controlled by the left last century. And in their warped and depraved little minds no one else had anything different or important to say. And if they did say something different they were muzzled as soon as possible.

No wonder Clinton pines for the good old days, they were a great national one-sided conversation favoring his viewpoints. It was so much simpler when such a scenario eliminated the viewpoints of your opponents!

I'm not saying ABC, CBS, and NBC lied (though sometimes they did). I'm saying they told the truth by giving out facts, but limited the truth telling to the leftist worldview in order to manipulate the whole of the people against the Constitution and our traditional values. Their deceit lay in how they gave out the facts.

They also wanted to manipulate the people towards one world government.

These major news outlets had for a long time belonged and still belong to the Council on Foreign Relations. They are still corporate members of the CFR. The CIA is a member too. And so is Bill Clinton. These all had and continue to have one goal--one world government. And so every major political truth (fact) the "mainstream" media gave out, back then and now, was and is influenced by this goal.

Everything liberal elites (including George Bush and John McCain) do, they do for the seditious and treasonous goal of one world government promoted by the CFR. This explains why McCain, Bush (and Obama) want to flood the country with Hispanics. It makes one world government easier.

IT IS ALSO TREASON according to the common understanding of it.

A free media makes deceiving the public about the goal of one world government more difficult. That has got to frost our one world government cheerleader, Mr. Bill.

He took a personal jab at those talking about secession or carrying guns into Starbucks. According to him, they are against Obama's change because it threatens their former way of life or "social status". And just what did HE do because of the sudden change in HIS social status while he was president? Starve 500,000 Iraqi children to death and launch an illegal war in Kosovo?

Is that how HE coped?

As I have shown, Mr. Bill knows something about being afraid of change as he doesn't like the change the new media has brought to politicians like him.

According to Mr. Bill, right wingers are responding badly to the changes they see around them (about the 16:30 mark). But what he is actually doing is criticizing them for their response to injustices being directed at themselves and their loved ones.

We can sympathize with a person who resists a unjust act, and likewise we are offended when a person resists a just act. But Mr. Bill is criticizing gun toters and secessionists for their response and resistance to injustice--the injustice Mr. Bill promotes against his critics.

This is warped thinking on his part.

As he is not criticizing them for wrongly resisting a tyrannical government; he is criticizing them for rightly resisting a tyrannical government. This is very bad form on his part. It's moral corruption and intellectual degeneracy on his part. He is criticizing gun toters and pro-secessionists for responding correctly to despotism and tyranny!

A person who gets robbed and assaulted ought not like the change in his financial status and ought not appreciate his new aches and pains. Those who resist their despotic attackers don't want to hear Mr. Bill tell them to put an ice cube on their wounds.

They want the assault to stop.

He does say one thing I agree with.

He said there is too much advantage given to incumbent politicians.

Now he tells us.

http://criminalbehaviorusa.blogspot.com/2010/04/bill-clinton-our-first-black-president.html

http://www.bet.com/News/National_Militia_Acccused_of_Plotting_War_on_Government.htm

http://leftisthatewatch.blogspot.com/2010/05/bill-moyers-wolf-in-sheeps-clothing.html

http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hcoyG-Ck3-VwZB7fqpUFXbffoObg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bigotry

http://vodpod.com/watch/3587997-need-to-know-bill-clinton-extended-interview-pbs

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/fact

Corrections and revisions to blog post occur frequently. Thank you for your patience.

What Obama and Karl Marx Have In Common: Greed

2010-04-29T07:52:00.000-07:00

Real Clear Politics has the audio clip of Barack No-Relation-To-Saddam Hussein Obama saying that he believes that "...at a certain point you've made enough money."

One can say this of themselves, but only criminals and greedy people say this of others, because who are they to judge what is too much money for others to make?

God?

Obama may think so.

And our criminally-minded thug and leader of the used-to-be-free-world, also says this in the clip:

"...so what's workin' fine for them [Wall Street] isn't working fine for ordinary Americans."

Okay, I'll bite that. I'm that ordinary person.

And believe me, things haven't been working well for me for quite a while. I've lived on or near the poverty line before, I've lived in a 400 square foot dilapidated trailer for nearly a decade, faced financial catastrophe numerous times, lived and currently live paycheck to paycheck for decades. I have no savings, the 401K has been eaten up and was small anyway, I have no pension, no four year college degree, no stocks, no bonds, no investments, two old cars, a broken down home with broken down walls, floors, and appliances, I shop the sales, I regularly shop the Goodwill and thrift shops for nearly 3 decades, and I will probably never see a dollar of Social Security because government will steal it!

And I'm getting old.

The future is bleak save for my faith and my loved ones.

So I have "ordinary person" credentials aplenty. And that makes me a better representative of ordinary people and their problems, than a pampered, spoiled, arrogant, deceitful, aggressive, vicious, greedy, hostile liar like Barack Hussein Obama. He is also an elitist Harvard graduate lawyer vigorously attacking my country which I love, its white citizens' wealth, and the Constitution.

And let me, then, also say this. Wall Street hasn't done anything to hurt me more than Washington D.C., or my local government. Government are the ones stealing my money and making everything about my life difficult with laws and regulations that thwart my ability to make money at every turn.

On the Federal level, the Federal government destroyed the cottage industry in America that used to make hand-made toys and doll clothes for children. I have been a part of that industry off and on for a very long time. Guess who prospered because of it? The big toy makers. Call them Big Toy. Big Toy is Congress' newest play-mate. Big Toy is big on outsourcing production overseas paying foreigners instead of Americans. They don't have to worry about people like me anymore because we cannot afford the testing of our products in order to sell them to children. Congress trampled the little guy again.

I cannot bake foods in my home and sell them because the government feels it has the right to control what goes on in MY house if I do. It thinks people are too stupid to know how to purchase food from people they trust. Well, I think that form of government is stupid, evil, and un-American.

Government interferes with our right to pursue happiness and liberty at all turns. And, then, government--Obama--has the nerve to complain about people who have never thwarted my right to live and survive by my own hard work? I'm sorry, but that stupid, evil, or both.

Only gullible people gave their money over to Wall Street and they deserved what they got. Now, I'm not for Wall Street being crooks, but I'm positive that the crooks in D.C. are worse and exceedingly more dangerous because they constantly have a gun to our heads and are becoming a police-state.

So please, enough of pretending to care for me. Obama uses his phony concern for others in order to steal and rob the rich in order to buy power for himself and his fellow Marxist slave drivers in the Democratic Party in order to control the slaves. It is phony because has Obama donated all his wealth to the poor yet except, say, 100,000 dollars for the coming year? He doesn't need any more than that in my opinion. And why can't I decide that that is enough money for him to live on annually for next ten years if he thinks he can decide what other people should make?

This is what Marxism has always been about and we are not supposed to call Obama a Marxist. He just should be all to act like one and no one should say so. Marxism about greed and envy that other people have money and Obama has them big time. Marxism and Obamaism are thus criminally-minded ideologies that center around the biblical warning that the love of money is the root of all evil. Obama violates the bible because of his lust for other peoples' money. They have it, he wants it.

That is the mind-set of a thief. You could call him the Commander in Thief.

I'm saying all this as a person who has never a lot of money and has lost it all in the past. But I know a thief and I know stealing when I see it. And when the people with the biggest guns, tanks, and bombs are doing the stealing, the stealing by Wall Street pales in comparison.

Now I realize that Ron Paul says we aren't being accurate about Obama if we call him a socialist. I'm sure he has to be circumspect because he is a colleague of Obama. Dr. Paul says Obama is a corporatist. And indeed he is. But the corporatism is just a way for Obama to hide his already self-confessed Marxist goal of redistribution. Corporatism is just another means of collectivism. All collectivist systems (according to Friedrich Hayek) are totalitarian. I also know a Marxist when I see one and I know a totalitarian too.

I am fully persuaded that Obama is a "temporary" Marxist, as a means to an end. I believe Obama knows that the establishment of Marxism destabilizes economies and governments and that is his plan. And I believe he is quite aware that this destabilization leads to dictatorship and/or totalitarianism. That is the goal, if not for himself, then for those like him among his fellow elites in America.

That is about the only generous thing I have ever witnessed in President Obama.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2010/04/28/obama_to_wall_street_i_do_think_at_a_certain_point_youve_made_enough_money.html

Your Kids Are State Owned Cannon Fodder Slaves

2010-04-20T21:43:00.000-07:00

And don't you forget it.

So nix the salt. Then the sugar, and saturated fats. The dictatorship owns your kids and you'd better watch your step. The military (or former military) wants to prep your kids for war. Read about it here at AOL news if you haven't heard it already.

Friedrich Hayke wrote that "Emergencies have always been the pretext on which the safeguards of individual liberty have been eroded."

No kidding.

Of course, if the government or these military people REALLY cared about keeping America safe they'd be making breathless pronouncements to keep all foreign Muslims out of the country, get out of Muslim lands, stop interfering in the internal affairs of other nations (which promotes resentment or ATTACK), demand a moratorium on immigration, oppose amnesty, and promote secure borders. But that is not what these Constitution-smashers are flapping about.

If these cowardly geniuses promoted those things then maybe they wouldn't have to wring their hands about why so many fat-little non-whites who have the highest obesity rate in America (and nearly half of the babies born in America are non-white) won't be able to defend their mostly white Constitution-stomping arses.

And wouldn't you know it. That despicable blood-thirsty General Weasel Wesley Clark, who should be prosecuted for war crimes in Kosovo, is part of the cabal of former officers and military personnel at the bottom of this movement to control our precious little kindergartners, ultimately, in order to better shove them in front of bombs to save the Generals and their buds when the time comes.

With medically recommended levels of normal blood pressure, of course!

And to save what?

A country stripped of its Constitution and run by despots?

Gee, what brave heroes these guys are. It really takes a lot of guts to make soft, giggling, little Roly Pollies a national security threat instead confronting head-on MEN who are in the process of overthrowing the government in Washington D.C.

That might require courage.

Instead of their mad-cap scheme to control the food that goes in our childrens' mouths they should be signaling a warning, sounding the alarm, and protesting in the streets that commie totalitarians have taken over Congress and the White House. Instead there is whining like sissies about the salt shaker and plump children.

What a bunch of useless cowardly boobs hiding behind a row of big-eyed, tubby, pre-preschoolers cutely dotted with mustard and ketchup, clinging to their Happy Meal boxes and clutching their Barbies like some cling to their guns and religion.

Here is an article at Antiwar online about the blood-thirsty war-monger Wesley Clark. It is written by Stella Jatras, a military wife. Now look, I'm not "anti-war" by-the-way. I understand that sometimes they are necessary, but very rarely.

The Generals and crew pretend to worry about defending the country, but have yet to come out with a frothing hysterical statement that Congress ought to do those things which will keep us out of war (like stay out of other countries internal affairs). At least, I didn't hear it trumpeted throughout the land like the salt issue has been. I can only assume that is because they want us attacked and need for us to be seriously wounded or terrified at all times (is that the best way to ensure their pensions?)

It appears that the only way they can justify their police-state totalitarian viewpoint and destroy the Constitution is by terrorizing us into submission with the threats from without intentionally created by a meddling foreign policy promoted by government officials.

If you love your kids enough, you will not send them to our soviet-style public schools where they can chant like mindless (but svelte!) drones: yes we can, yes we can, yes we can. If you love your kids enough, you will reject these people and their fellow despots in Congress.

Take a stand. Abandon the police-state schools which are now nurseries for the war-mongers shaking in their Depends like old ladies stranded-by-the-side-of-the-road at 3 am in downtown Detroit.

Learn to be free.

Who or what is a threat to America?

Our greatest threat is usurpatious government (not salt or fat kids).

""There are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations" James Madison

"We must confine ourselves to the powers described in the Constitution, and the moment we pass it, we take an arbitrary stride towards a despotic Government."
-- James Jackson, First Congress, 1st Annals of Congress, 489 (We are already well past this)

"It could probably be shown by facts and figures that there is no distinctly native American criminal class except Congress."
-- Mark Twain, 1894

"The greatest [calamity] which could befall [us would be] submission to a government of unlimited powers."

-- Thomas Jefferson , Declaration and Protest of Virginia, 1825. The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, (Memorial Edition) Lipscomb and Bergh, editors, ME 17:445

The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed."
-- Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers at 184-188

What, Sir, is the use of a militia? It is to prevent the establishment of a standing army, the bane of liberty .... Whenever Governments mean to invade the rights and liberties of the people, they always attempt to destroy the militia, in order to raise an army upon their ruins."

--Rep. Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts, spoken during floor debate over the Second Amendment, I Annals of Congress at 750, August 17, 1789

The above quotes are were collected and published by Walter Williams at George Mason University.

If a standing army is a dangerous thing, how is it that our children must be forced to be fit for it?

http://www.aolnews.com/weird-news/article/ex-military-brass-us-youth-too-fat-to-fight/19446698

http://www.missionreadiness.org/index.html

http://www.antiwar.com/orig/jatras12.html

http://www.happymeal.com/en_US/#toys

http://econfaculty.gmu.edu/wew/quotes/govt.html

http://econfaculty.gmu.edu/wew/quotes/arms.html